Molecules 2009, 14
567
Introduction
Rubia cordifolia Linn (Rubiaceae) is a slender, branched, climbing plant, with very long cylindrical
roots, widely distributed in China, India and tropical Australia [1]. In the traditional Chinese system of
medicine, Rubia cordifolia is used for the treatment of vertigo, insomnia, rheumatism, tuberculosis,
hematemesis, menstrual disorders and contusions. The plant was recently reported to possess
antimicrobial activity [2-3] and previous phytochemical examinations have shown that it produces
triterpenoids, anthraquinones, cyclopeptides and phenolics [4-12]. During our investigations on plants
used for antimicrobial purposes in Chinese medicine, a 70% methanolic extract of the dried roots of
Rubia cordifolia showed considerable activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Purification of the bioactive extract results in the isolation and identification of a novel anthraquinone,
designated with the common named Rubiacordone A (1), and the previously reported anthraquinone 2,
both of which showed antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria when tested using the disc-
diffusion method.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of compound 1
Anthraquinone 1 was isolated as an orange-colored amorphous powder, and its molecular formula
was determined as C23H22O10 on the basis of its HR-ESI-MS (m/z 459.1303 [M+H]+, calcd. 459.1291)
and NMR data (Table 1). While, the IR spectra of 1 exhibited absorption bands at 3,438, 1,739 and
1,630 cm-1, indicating the existence of hydroxyl, acetyl and ketone functionalities in the structure, the
13
UV spectra showed typical anthraquinone maxima values at 269, 305, 410 nm. Analysis of the C-
NMR spectrum and the DEPT experiment, allowed the identification of three methyl groups, nine
methines and nine quaternary carbons. The chemical shifts of the protons and carbons in the phenolic
region of 1 (Table 1) were similar to those of the previously reported 1-acetoxy-6-hydroxy-2-
methylanthraquinone-3-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside (2), an anthraquinone
also isolated from Rubia cordifolia [8]. The main differences between the two metabolites concerned
the location of the acetyl group and the nature of the sugar moiety; with the acetyl group located at C-1
in 2 and to C-6 in 1, and the sugar moiety being α-L-rhamnopyranoside in the novel anthraquinone (1),
instead of the α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside present in the known anthraquninone
13
2. This was supported by the C-NMR data of 1, which showed only one set of “sugar” signals at δC
103.3 (d, C-1'), δC 71.7 (d, C-2'), δC 72.9 (d, C-3'), δC 72.0 (d, C-4'), δC 73.2 (d, C-5'), and δC 18.6 (q,
C-6'''). The location of the sugar moiety at C-3 was established taking into account the correlation
observed between H-1’ (δ 5.48) and C-3 (δ 156.8) in the HMBC experiment of 1 (Figure 1). The sugar
moiety was identified as rhamnose when the acid hydrolysis of 1 produced a component having the
same Rf value on TLC as that of an authentic sample of rhamnose. The coupling constant between the
H1' and H2' (1.5 Hz) protons in the 1H-NMR of 1 indicated an α-rhamnose; the absolute configuration
of the α-rhamnose was further determined to be α-L-rhamnose by chiral GC analysis. Finally, the
location of the acetyl group was established on the basis of the HMBC correlation between the acetyl’s
methyl group (δ 2.10) and the C-6 carbon (158.7) (Figure 1). On the basis of this data, metabolite 1