T. Tajima et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 4857–4860
4859
Me
N
Me
N
Me
N
Me
N
-e
-e, -H+
F-
NC
NC
NC
NC
F
F
H
1
A
2
H2O, -H+
-2e, 2F-
Me
Me
N
Me
N
H2O
N
NC
NC
OH
NC
F
F
F
O
H
F
F
4
5
-e, -H+
Me
Me
Me
-e, -H+
-e, F-
N
N
N
NC
NC
OH
O
O
F
3
Scheme 4.
In order to clarify the reaction mechanism, the oxida-
tion potentials of 1 and 2 were measured. The oxidation
potential of 2 (EOP X=1.72 V versus SEC) was found to
be slightly less positive compared with 1 (EOP X=1.77 V
versus SCE). It was also confirmed that anodic fluori-
nation of 2 in MeCN/Et3N·3HF provided 5 selectively
in good yield (Scheme 3).
In sharp contrast to the case of 1, the anodic fluorina-
tion of pyrrole and 1-methylpyrrole gave only a poly-
merized product and no fluorinated product was
formed.
In conclusion, we have successfully carried out for the
first time anodic fluorination of 2-cyano-1-
methylpyrrole. The product 4 has a biologically inter-
esting gem-difluoromethylene unit in the heterocyclic
ring and 2 has also a versatile cyano group and a
fluorine atom. Therefore, 2 and 4 seem to be useful
fluorinated building blocks. Work on further applica-
tion and the scope and limitation of the methodology
for anodic fluorination is now in progress.
Furthermore, the relationship between the product
yields and the charge passed was investigated. As
shown in Fig. 1, trifluorinated product 5 was formed
even at an early stage of the electrolysis, and the yield
of 5 increased linearly to 65% with the amount of
electricity. In contrast, the yield of 2 is rather low and
did not change with the electricity. These facts suggest
that 2 is easily oxidized to give 5 immediately after 2 is
formed during the electrolysis.
References
From these results, a possible reaction mechanism was
proposed as shown in Scheme 4. This reaction sequence
can be explained by a conventional ECEC process.
Since 2 is more easily oxidized than 1, the trifluorinated
product 5 is preferentially formed by the further elec-
trochemical oxidation of 2 once formed during the
electrolysis. However, since Et3N·2HF is easily oxi-
dized, the further oxidation of 2 seems to be suppressed
by simultaneous oxidation of Et3N·2HF. In support of
this hypothesis, the use of Et3N·5HF and Et4NF·4HF,
which are stable for oxidation, did not provide 2. The
trifluorinated product 5 is unstable; however, it is easily
converted to the difluoro compound 4 efficiently by the
hydrolysis of 5. As already mentioned, the use of
Et3N·5HF/MeCN and Et4NF·4HF/MeCN gave 3 and
4, while the use of CH2Cl2 instead of MeCN provided
3 solely. The reason for such product selectivity is not
clear at present. The monofluorinated product 3 seems
to be formed by the addition of water to the radical
cation A (Scheme 4).
1. Shaban M. R.; Ishii, H.; Fuchigami, T. J. Org. Chem., in
press.
2. (a) Biomedicinal Aspects of Fluorine Chemistry; Filler, R.,
Kobayashi, Y., Eds.; Kodansha & Elsevier Biomedical:
Tokyo, 1982; (b) Fluorine in Bioorganic Chemistry;
Welch, J. T.; Eswarakrishnan, S., Eds.; Wiley: New York,
1991; (c) Organofluorine Compounds; Hiyama, T., Ed.;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2000.
3. (a) Gozzo, F. C.; Ifa, D. R.; Eberlin, M. N. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 3920; (b) Cerichelli, G.; Crestoni, M. E.;
Fornarini, S. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1990, 120, 749.
4. (a) Fuchigami, T. In Organic Electrochemistry, 4th ed.;
Lund, H.; Hammerich, O., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New
York, 2001; Chapter 25; (b) Fuchigami, T. In Topics in
Current Chemistry 170: Electrochemistry; Steckhan, E.,
Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1994; Vol. 5, p. 1; (c)
Fuchigami, T. In Advances in Electron-Transfer Chem-
istry; Mariano, P. S., Ed.; JAI Press: Conneticut, 1999;
Vol. 6, p. 41; (d) Fuchigami, T. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn.
1994, 52, 1063.