Enzymatic Enantioseparation of Bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-diones
1515
regeneration of NADH was performed following two different ways, either by
addition of dithionite (method A) or by using an excess of ethanol (method B). In
the latter case, the oxidized form of the coenzyme (NAD ) is regenerated to its
reduced form (NADH) in the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by HLADH according
to Eqs. (1) and (2).
1 NADH H ! Products NAD
ꢀ1
ꢀ2
NAD C2H5OH ! NADH H CH3CHO
Since both reactions are catalyzed by the same enzyme, a coupled substrate
recycling results in the reduction of 1 by ethanol (Eq. (3)).
1 C2H5OH ! Products CH3CHO
ꢀ3
In case of a molar excess of the reducing agent (i.e. dithionite or ethanol) relative to
1, the equilibrium of the coupled process (3) should be strongly shifted towards the
products of enzymatic reduction of 1. In the present work, this was achieved by the
use of a 16-fold molar excess of dithionite (method A) or a 42-fold molar excess of
ethanol (method B). The performance of a coupled process with the regeneration of
coenzyme allows to use much lower amounts of NAD than demanded by the
stoichiometry of Eq. (1). In the present work, a molar ratio of NAD to 1 as low as
10:1 or 30:1 was used, permitting to perform a preparative synthesis in the range of
ca. 1 g of 1.
It was established by thin layer chromatography that, even at long incubation
times, the amount of converted 1 did not exceed 30 to 50%. After the conversion is
completed, 6-hydroxy-bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2-one (2) was found as the main
reaction product next to a small amount of bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-diol (3). The
amount of 3, as compared to that of 2, was found to be higher upon using method
B. Also, a higher degree of conversion of 1 to 2 and 3 was observed in this case. It
therefore follows that HLADH-catalyzed regeneration of NAD by means of ethanol
is more ef®cient than the dithionite-assisted process.
After the enzymatic conversion was completed, unreacted 1 could be easily
extracted from the reaction mixture by means of organic solvents and puri®ed by
column liquid chromatography. Unreacted 1 obtained in this way displayed optical
activity which increased with increasing conversion degree of 1 up to 50%.
Optically active ( )-1 obtained in this way showed lower activity in an enzymatic
reaction when compared to racemic 1. ( )-1 obtained by method A showed an
[ꢀ]D value of 66ꢁ and a relative activity in the HLADH-catalyzed reaction of
59% as compared to racemic 1, whereas the corresponding values for ( )-1
obtained by method B were 149ꢁ and 37%.
It could be concluded from this result that only ()-1 undergoes an enzymatic
reduction in the HLADH-catalyzed reaction, whereas ( )-1 remains unconverted.
The extrapolation of [ꢀ]D and the relative activity in enzymatic reaction to zero for
the latter, provided for the samples of ( )-1 and obtained by varying of reaction
conditions, yield an [ꢀ]D value of 197ꢁ for enantiomerically pure ( )-1. The
value obtained is closely related to that reported for ()-1 ([ꢀ]D 191ꢁ [2]). The
oxidation of the main enzyme reaction product 2 by dichromate following the well-
known Jones procedure yielded ()-1 with [ꢀ]D 119ꢁ. The interconversions of
the bicyclic compounds studied are shown in Scheme 1.