A R T I C L E S
Denmark et al.
share a common pathway in which an in situ-generated chiral
Lewis acid catalyzes the addition of one of the above-mentioned
nucleophiles to a range of aldehydes. The conceptual basis for
the activation of the nascent Lewis acid (silicon tetrachloride)
derives from the rehybridization of the Lewis acid-base adduct,
spectrometer and ready for acquisition, all while coordinating
the injection event with data acquisition. Care must then be taken
to ensure that the data are collected in a manner that produces
integral values that are not only internally consistent (resonance
to resonance within a single spectrum) but also consistent among
the plethora of spectra collected over the course of an individual
experiment. To this end, we have developed a rapid-injection
7a
Scheme 1, and has been discussed in detail elsewhere. During
the development of the various aldol additions catalyzed by this
unique Lewis acid, a working hypothesis for the mechanism of
the process was formulated that borrowed heavily from our
understanding of the cognate reactions of enoxytrichlorosilanes
described above. However, from simple empirical analysis of
the rates, selectivities, substrate scope, and response to experi-
mental variables, it was clear that the two manifolds were not
completely congruent. In addition, no definitive mechanistic
studies supported the validity of those analogies. Accordingly,
we undertook the challenge of placing this newer family of
catalyzed aldol additions on the same concrete foundation that
now exists for the enoxytrichlorosilane additions.
1
system that, when coupled with a high-sensitivity H NMR
2
0
probe, allows us to accurately inject a known volume of a
reagent solution into a sample tube inside the magnet (and
controlled by the spectrometer console), even while the tube is
2
1
spinning at -78 °C.
This system allows reactions to be monitored under conditions
that are identical to, or very closely resemble, those employed
in the preparative system, minimizing the danger that the results
will not be representative of those from preparative reactions.
In our case, four minor adjustments were made to the preparative
system to allow the reactions of interest to be studied repro-
ducibly: (1) the overall concentration (0.076 M) was dropped
to one-third that of the preparative conditions, (2) chromium(III)
Scheme 1
2
2
3
tris(dipivaloylmethane) [Cr(dpm) , 5 mM] was added as a
paramagnetic relaxation agent to allow a more rapid acquisition
cycle while ensuring integral accuracy, (3) the injected reagent
was dissolved in CDCl , not CD Cl , and (4) the reactions were
3 2 2
performed at -60 °C. For these studies, 1-naphthaldehyde was
chosen as the aldehyde component due to the exquisite
selectivities observed with this substrate, as well as its lower
rate of reaction.
Employing this system to study the asymmetric Lewis base
catalyzed aldol reaction allowed us to study the reaction under
the preparative conditions. That is, each sample tube can be
2
. Objectives of This Study. To investigate the validity of
2
3
the working hypothesis outlined in Scheme 1, the following
reaction parameters needed clarification: (1) the effect on
reaction rate and enantioselectivity of different catalyst struc-
tures, (2) the molecularity of the transition structure, (3) the
stoichiometry, structure, and equilibrium position of the Lewis
base-Lewis acid association, and (4) the overall rate equation
and partial orders with respect to all reaction components.
Ultimately, our goal was to formulate a unified mechanistic
picture that could explain the origin of catalysis and selectivity.
We describe herein the successful realization of the first of these
two highly ambitious goals. The second, i.e., rationalization of
selectivity, will require extensive computational analysis of the
structures that have been established in this study.
filled with all of the reagents (1-naphthaldehyde, SiCl
DIPEA, and the Lewis basic catalyst) dissolved in CD Cl with
added Cr(dpm) , Scheme 2. All concentrations but one were
4
,
2
2
3
held constant, while the concentration of the reagent being
studied was varied from 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 times the normal
reaction concentration (for an 8-fold range). All of the samples
were stored under an inert atmosphere at -78 °C, before being
placed into the precooled (-60 °C) spectrometer. Once the
sample was in the magnet, the injector was inserted into the
sample tube while it was spinning, and the entire apparatus was
temperature equilibrated for a period of 5-10 min, which
allowed the sample in the injector to cool. A vigorous flow of
nitrogen (between 10 and 20 L/min) through the probe was
maintained to ensure rapid equilibration. The magnetic field was
shimmed in the normal fashion, the spectrometer was pro-
3
. Challenges and Solutions: Development and Imple-
mentation of RINMR Spectroscopic Analysis. Monitoring the
progress of a dilute (ca. 40 mM) reaction that has a half-life of
less than 90 s at -78 °C is a daunting task. Only spectroscopic
(20) The temperature range is determined by the conditions that the probe
can support. The Varian 10 mm broadband probe used in these studies
has operating limits of -130 and +100 °C.
1
9
methods are viable at these temperatures. Although IR
spectroscopy is popular for reaction monitoring, at concentra-
tions below 0.1 M, the low sensitivity of this technique is
prohibitive. Monitoring the progress of these reactions by NMR
spectroscopy is ideal as it allows exquisite sensitivity, the ability
to operate over a wide range of temperatures, and the observa-
tion of any well-resolved resonance(s), whether correlated to
starting material, intermediate, or product.
(
21) The details of the design, implementation, calibration, and use of this
system are not the subject of this publication and will be published in
due course. For descriptions and results from pioneering RINMR
studies, see: (a) McGarrity, J. F.; Prodolliet, J.; Smyth, T. Org. Magn.
Reson. 1981, 17, 59. (b) Palmer, C. A.; Ogle, C. A.; Arnett, E. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5619. (c) Reetz, M. T.; Raguse, B.;
Marth, C. F.; H u¨ gel, H. M.; Bach, T.; Fox, D. N. A. Tetrahedron
1
992, 48, 5731.
(
22) The additive Cr(dpm)
3
was chosen over the more popular Cr(acac)
3
The difficulty in this case is rapidly delivering a known
amount of a temperature-equilibrated reagent into a temperature-
equilibrated substrate while the sample is spinning in the NMR
due to its decreased Lewis acidity, minimizing the chance that it would
interfere with the reaction. Control experiments showed no measurable
influence of this additive on the rate of reaction, as well as no reactivity
4
in the absence of SiCl (see Supporting Information). Levy, G. C.;
Edlund, U.; Hexem, J. G. J. Magn. Reson. 1975, 19, 259–262.
(
19) Reaction calorimetry at this temperature is challenging and lacks
reproducibility, and ex situ analysis of a quenched aliquot requires
that no significant warming of the sample occur before the quench, a
very difficult task in this temperature regime.
(23) Commercial 1-naphthaldehyde is contaminated with ca. 10% 2-naph-
thaldehyde, which reacts faster than 1-naphthaldehyde. The 1-naph-
thaldehyde used in these kinetic studies was purified to g99.8% purity
before use. Details are in the Supporting Information.
1
1772 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 131, NO. 33, 2009