however is hampered by the low yield (<30%) of the C-C
Dess-Martin reagent. We then performed the Henry reaction
using nitromethane and 5% sodium ethoxide in ethanol which
proved to be the best conditions with respect to substrate
conversion. However, selectivity of this reaction was found
to be unfavorable, namely, the undesired (2S,4S)-diastere-
omer (threo) (7b) was formed in a 3:2 ratio with regard to
the desired (2S,4R)-diastereomer (erythro) (7a) as determined
coupling step.12
Overall, access to (2S,4R)-4-hydroxyornithine (1) remained
problematic since either complicated purification procedures,
numerous steps, or unsatisfactory reactions were involved.
As we were interested in a more efficient access to
(2S,4R)-4-hydroxyornithine (1), we envisioned a strategy
starting from L-aspartic acid and adding a nucleophilic C-N
unit to the carboxylic acid function of its side chain.
We began our investigations with a nitroaldol reaction
approach13 using the semialdehyde of diprotected L-aspartic
acid14 and nitromethane, as shown in Scheme 1. As starting
1
by H NMR analysis (stereochemistry assigned via X-ray
analysis of the isolated threo-isomer 7b). Following this
approach, we were able to isolate only 15% of the nitro
alcohol 7a. Attempts to improve the selectivity were unsuc-
cessful.17
Because of the unfavorable diastereoselectivity and yield
of the nitroaldol reaction, we turned to a different strategy
for C-C-coupling which would involve the generation of
an R-nitroketone. It is known that R-nitroketones can be
formed by reaction of acylimidazoles with deprotonated
nitromethane.18,19 On the basis of this method, we developed
a versatile procedure which proved to be superior for our
purposes compared to the original one (Scheme 2): (S)-N-
Scheme 1. Synthetic Pathway to (2S,4R)-4-Hydroxyornithine
via Henry Reactiona
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Hydroxyornithine Derivative 10
via Acylation of Nitromethane as the Key Stepa
a (i) NMM, ClCOOEt, THF; NaBH4, H2O; (ii) polymer-bound
bromite(I) complex 6, catalytic TEMPO; (iii) CH3NO2, NaOEt
(5%), EtOH.
a (i) CDI (1.05 equiv), THF, rt; CH3NO2 (10 equiv), t-BuOK
(1.1 equiv), rt; (ii) L-Selectride, THF, -78 °C; (iii) catalytic Pd/C,
NH4+HCOO-, -10 °C; (iv) Z-OSu, DIPEA, DMF, rt.
material for the synthesis of the aspartic acid semialdehyde,
we chose commercially available (S)-N-Boc-aspartic acid
tert-butyl ester 3. The tert-butyl ester group of γ-hydroxy
amino acids is known to be stable toward lactonization which
we preferred to avoid. (S)-N-Boc aspartic acid tert-butyl ester
3 was reduced to the corresponding homoserine derivative
4,15 which was subsequently oxidized to the semialdehyde
5. The method of choice for oxidizing the alcohol function
of 4 was found to be the polymer-bound bromite(I) complex
6 as recently described by Kirschning et al.16 This method
gave very high yields and was found to be superior to the
Boc-aspartic acid tert-butyl ester 3 was activated with
carbonyl diimidazole and transformed to the nitroketone 9
by treatment with excess nitromethane in the presence of
t-BuOK in a very clean reaction (96% yield). It was found
to be particularly important to use an excess of nitromethane
(10-fold) and an equimolar amount of t-BuOK. After the
successful implementation of the scaffold of hydroxy-
ornithine, we wanted to first reduce the keto group of 9 to
an alcohol function in a diastereoselective manner and
(12) (a) Jackson, R. F. W.; Rettie, A. B.; Wood, A.; Wythes, M. J. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1719-1726. (b) Jackson, R. F. W.;
Wishart, N.; Wood, A.; James, K.; Wythes, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
3397-3404. (c) Jackson, R. F. W.; Wood, A.; Wythes, M. J. Synlett 1990,
735-736.
(13) (a) Luzzio, F. A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 915-945. (b) Rosini, G.
In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford,
1991; Vol. 2, p 321.
(14) For a comprehensive overview on different strategies for the
synthesis of aspartaldehyde derivatives, see: Meffre, P. Amino Acids 1999,
16, 251-272.
(15) Valerio, R. M.; Alewood, P. F.; Johns, R. B. Synthesis 1988, 786-
789.
(17) Earlier studies also indicated that control of stereochemistry is
difficult for Henry reactions of nitroalkanes with aldehydes bearing a chiral
center in the â-position. See: (a) Moorman, A. R.; Martin, T.; Borchardt,
R. T. Carbohydr. Res. 1983, 113, 233-239. (b) Nakata, T.; Komatsu, T.;
Nagasawa, K.; Yamada, H.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
8225-8228.
(18) Baker, D. C.; Putt, S. R. Synthesis 1978, 478-479. According to
the authors, the high preference of C-acylation over O-acylation for the
ambidently nucleophilic methanenitronate anion is assigned to the unique
reactivity of the acylimidazole which behaves differently from other
activated acyl species.
(16) Sourkouni-Agirusi, G.; Kirschning, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3781-
3784.
(19) For a recent application, see: Yuasa, Y.; Yuasa, Y.; Tsuruta, H.
Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 395-401.
3154
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 20, 2001