8
H. Tanaka et al. / Journal of Catalysis 268 (2009) 1–8
In the CPO of methane, water gas shift (WGS) reaction (CO +
H2O ? CO2 + H2,
H = ꢁ41 kJ/mol) proceeds as well as the oxida-
Appendix A. Supplementary data
D
tion of methane and the steam reforming of methane. Since the
heat due to the WGS is much smaller than those due to the meth-
ane oxidation and steam reforming, it is difficult to recognize the
reaction zone by our experimental setup. Based on the outlet tem-
perature and the composition of the effluent gas in the CPO of
methane without N2 dilution (Table 4), we calculate the equation
below [19]:
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] J.R. Rostrup-Nielsen, J. Sehested, J.K. Nørskov, Adv. Catal. 47 (2002) 65.
[2] J.R. Rostrup-Nielsen, Catal. Today 145 (2009) 72.
[3] D.A. Hickman, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 138 (1992) 267.
[4] D.A. Hickman, L.D. Schmidt, Science 259 (1993) 343.
[5] R. Horn, K.A. Williams, N.J. Degenstein, A. Bitsch-Larsen, D. Dalle Nogare, S.A.
Tupy, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 249 (2007) 380.
[6] C. Elmasides, T. Ioannides, X.E. Verykios, ALChE J. 46 (2000) 1260.
[7] B.C. Enger, R. Lødeng, A. Holmen, Appl. Catal. A 346 (2008) 1.
[8] H.C. Yao, Y.F. Yu Yao, J. Catal. 86 (1984) 254.
[9] N.R. Collins, M.V. Twigg, Top. Catal. 42–43 (2007) 323.
[10] A. Gayen, K.R. Priolkar, P.R. Sarode, V. Jayaram, M.S. Hedge, G.N. Subbanna, S.
Emura, Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 2317.
[11] K. Nagaoka, K. Sato, S. Fukuda, S. Nakashiki, H. Nishiguchi, J.A. Lercher, Y.
Takita, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) 4176.
[12] R. Wang, H. Xu, X. Liu, Q. Ge, W. Li, Appl. Catal. A 305 (2006) 204.
[13] M. Asadullah, S. Ito, K. Kunimori, M. Yamada, K. Tomishige, J. Catal. 208 (2002)
255.
[14] T. Miyazawa, K. Okumura, K. Kunimori, K. Tomishige, J. Phys. Chem. C 112
(2008) 2574.
[15] P.J. Dauenhauer, B.J. Dreyer, N.J. Degenstein, L.D. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 46 (2007) 5864.
[16] J.R. Salge, G.A. Deluga, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 235 (2005) 69.
[17] W. Cai, F. Wang, A.C. Van Veen, H. Provendir, C. Mirodatos, W. Shen, Catal.
Today 138 (2008) 152.
ꢀ
ꢁ
KEXP
KEQ
PH PCO
1
2
2
¼
ꢀ
PCO
P
KEQ;WGS
H2
O
WGS
Here, KEQ is the equilibrium constant calculated with the outlet
temperature, and Pi are the partial pressures of species i. The values
of Rh/MgO and Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 4) are 2.4 and 2.8, respec-
tively. The difference is so small that it is difficult to discuss the ef-
fect of CeO2 on the equilibrium approach of the WGS reaction.
On the other hand, Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 18.7) showed low
methane conversion in the CPO of methane with N2 dilution and
high bed temperature in the CPO without dilution. As shown in Ta-
ble 6, the ability to activate methane of Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/
Rh = 18.7) was inferior to Rh/MgO and Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 4),
although the small increase of reacted methane amount that could
be interpreted by dewetting effect of Ce oxidation was observed.
Low ability to activate methane is related to high oxidation degree
in the CPO of methane as listed out in Table 5. Both low steam
reforming activity and high oxidation degree during the CPO bring
about the bed temperature increase in the CPO without N2 dilution
and the decrease of methane conversion in the CPO with N2 dilu-
tion on Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 18.7).
[18] I. Cuautémoc, G.D. Angel, G. Torres, V. Bertin, Catal. Today 133–135 (2008) 588.
[19] A. Donazzi, B.C. Michael, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 260 (2008) 270.
[20] B.C. Micael, A. Donazzi, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 265 (2009) 117.
[21] A. Bitsch-Larsen, N.J. Degenestein, L.D. Schmidt, Appl. Catal. B 78 (2008) 364.
[22] K. Tomishige, Y.G. Chen, K. Fujimoto, J. Catal. 181 (1999) 91.
[23] Y.G. Chen, K. Tomishige, K. Yokoyama, K. Fujimoto, Appl. Catal. A 165 (1997)
335.
[24] K. Imagawa, A. Nagumo, R. Kanai, T. Minami, K. Tomishige, Y. Suehiro, Stud.
Surf. Sci. Catal. 167 (2007) 415.
4. Conclusions
[25] H.Y. Wang, E. Ruckenstein, J. Catal. 186 (1999) 181.
[26] E. Ruckenstein, H.Y. Wang, J. Catal. 190 (2000) 32.
[27] E. Ruckenstein, H.Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. A 198 (2000) 33.
[28] S. Naito, H. Tanaka, S. Kado, T. Miyao, S. Naito, K. Okumura, K. Kunimori, K.
Tomsihge, J. Catal. 259 (2008) 138.
[29] J.R. Anderson, Structure of Metallic Catalysts, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
p. 358.
[30] D.G. Mustard, C.H. Bartholomew, J. Catal. 67 (1981) 186.
[31] N. Seshu Babu, N. Lingaiah, R. Gopinath, P. Siva Sankar Reddy, P.S. Sai Prasad, J.
Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 6447.
[32] B. Li, S. Kado, Y. Mukainakano, T. Miyazawa, T. Miyao, S. Naito, K. Okumura, K.
Kunimori, K. Tomishige, J. Catal. 245 (2007) 144.
[33] Y. Mukainakano, B. Li, S. Kado, T. Miyazawa, K. Okumura, T. Miyao, S. Naito, K.
Kunimori, K. Tomishige, Appl. Catal. A 318 (2007) 252.
[34] J.R. Anderson, Structure of Metallic Catalysts, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
p. 289.
[35] S. Bernal, F.J. Bontana, J.J. Calvino, G.A. Cifredo, J.A. Pérez-Omil, J.M. Pintado,
Catal. Today 23 (1995) 219.
[36] C. Force, J.P. Belzunegui, J. Sanz, A. Martínez-Arias, J. Soria, J. Catal. 197 (2001)
192.
[37] J. Stubenrauch, J.M. Vohs, Catal. Lett. 47 (1997) 21.
[38] K. Tomishige, A. Okabe, K. Fujimoto, Appl. Catal. A 194–195 (2000) 383.
[39] R. Ueda, T. Kusakari, K. Tomishige, K. Fujimoto, J. Catal. 194 (2000) 14.
[40] G.L. Haller, D.E. Resasco, Adv. Catal., vol. 36, Academic Press, New York, 1989.
p. 173.
[41] S.J. Tauster, Acc. Chem. Res. 20 (1987) 389.
[42] R. Horn, N.J. Degenstein, K.A. Williams, L.D. Schmidt, Catal. Lett. 110 (2006)
169.
[43] R. Horn, K.A. Williams, N.J. Degenstein, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 242 (2006) 92.
[44] T. Liu, C. Snyder, G. Veser, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 9045.
[45] D.D. Nogare, N.J. Degenstein, R. Horn, P. Canu, L.D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 258 (2008)
131.
[46] K. Tomsihgie, S. Kanazawa, K. Suzuki, M. Asadullah, M. Sato, K. Ikushima, K.
Kunimori, Appl. Catal. A 233 (2002) 35.
[47] B. Li, K. Maruyama, M. Nurunnabi, K. Kunimori, K. Tomishgie, Appl. Catal. A
275 (2004) 157.
[48] B. Li, S. Kado, Y. Mukainakano, M. Nurunnabi, T. Miyao, S. Naito, K. Kunimori, K.
Tomishige, Appl. Catal. A 304 (2006) 62.
The additive amount of CeO2 over Rh–CeO2/MgO was opti-
mized at Ce/Rh = 4 in terms of highest methane conversion in
the catalytic partial oxidation (CPO) of methane with N2 dilution
and lowest catalyst bed temperature in the CPO of methane
without N2 dilution. Characterization results indicated that the
addition of CeO2 to Rh/MgO decreased Rh metal particle size
monotonously with increasing CeO2 amount, and that Rh metal
particles were partially covered with the Ce species on Rh–
CeO2/MgO catalysts. As a result of the pulse CPO of methane,
the optimized Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 4) exhibited much lower
oxidation degree of the catalysts than Rh/MgO and Rh–CeO2/
MgO (Ce/Rh = 18.7). High resistance to oxidation of Rh–CeO2/
MgO (Ce/Rh = 4) can be caused by high ability to activate meth-
ane, on the reduced catalyst and even on the catalyst with
preadsorbed oxygen. The catalyst bed of the CPO of methane
mainly consists of the oxidation and the steam reforming zones.
High resistance to oxidation of Rh caused by the presence of
CeO2 is thought to decrease the ratio of the oxidized catalysts
and to increase simultaneously the ratio of the catalysts with
the reduced surface. High methane conversion in the CPO of
methane over Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 4) with N2 dilution can
be due to higher ratio of the reduced catalyst. At the same time,
the decrease in the catalyst bed temperature in the CPO of meth-
ane without N2 dilution on the Rh–CeO2/MgO (Ce/Rh = 4) with
higher resistance to the oxidation of Rh can be due to the pro-
motion of the overlap between the exothermic oxidation reac-
tion zone and the endothermic reforming zone.
[49] T. Sasaki, K. Nakao, K. Tomishige, K. Kunimori, Appl. Catal. A 328 (2007)
140.
[50] T. Sasaki, K. Nakao, K. Tomishige, K. Kunimori, Chem. Commun. (2006) 3821.
[51] M.A. Quinlan, B.J. Wood, H. Wise, Chem. Phys. Lett. 118 (1985) 478.
[52] M. Maestri, A. Beretta, G. Groppi, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Today 105
(2005) 709.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corpora-
tion (JOGMEC) and Chiyoda Corporation for financial support.