Organometallics 2001, 20, 4457-4459
4457
En h a n ced Rea ctivity of Ca tion ic vs Neu tr a l Ha fn ocen e
Com p lexes in Stoich iom etr ic a n d Ca ta lytic σ-Bon d
Meta th esis Rea ction s In volvin g Si-H a n d Si-C Bon d s
Aaron D. Sadow and T. Don Tilley*
Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley,
Berkeley, California 94720-1460
Received August 13, 2001
Summary: A comparison of the cation-like complex
CpCp*HfH(µ-H)B(C6F5)3 with the neutral analogue
CpCp*HfHCl reveals increased activity toward σ-bond
metathesis for the more electrophilic, cationic complex.
A catalytic transformation of PhSiH3 to Ph2SiH2 and
SiH4 by CpCp*HfH(µ-H)B(C6F5)3 appears to occur by
σ-bond metathesis of the Si-C bond, which occurs
concurrently with dehydropolymerization to highly cross-
linked polysilanes.
σ-bond metathesis reactivity at d0 metal centers. Given
similarities in the transition states for σ-bond metath-
esis and the propagation step of alkene polymerization,
as catalyzed by metallocene derivatives (both involve
four-center, four-electron, electrocyclic transition states),
it seemed that cationic complexes6 might exhibit en-
hanced reactivity in σ-bond metathesis. Indeed, a recent
theoretical study supports this view,7 and whereas
[Cp*2ZrH][HB(C6F5)3] reacts with benzene-d6 to form
[Cp*2ZrD][DB(C6F5)3],6a Cp*2ZrH2 is not deuterated by
benzene-d6.8 However, attempts to employ formally 14-
electron cationic metallocene catalysts for the dehydro-
polymerization of silanes have not led to significant
increases in polymer chain lengths, and in many cases
significant reductions in molecular weight have been
observed (implying reduced activity for the cationic
catalyst).9 Harrod and co-workers have identified a
cationic zirconocene system that is active in silane
polymerization, and interestingly they suggest that silyl
radicals may be involved in the mechanism for polysi-
lane formation.10 To better understand these reactivity
patterns, we have directly compared related cationic and
neutral d0 CpCp*Hf complexes in simple σ-bond me-
tathesis steps involving Si-H bonds. Here we report
evidence that the cationic complexes exhibit remarkably
higher reactivities.
Metal-mediated reactions involving bond cleavage and
bond formation via concerted, four-centered transition
states (σ-bond metathesis) offer considerable potential
for the development of new catalytic conversions. In
principle, such processes could be analogous to well-
known catalytic cycles based on oxidative addition and
reductive elimination but appear to be almost exclu-
sively associated with d0 transition metal centers. The
activation of hydrocarbons by σ-bond metathesis has
been well-known for over 20 years,1-3 but the develop-
ment of catalytic reactions involving this chemistry has
been hindered by the apparent restriction that carbon
cannot adopt the â-position of a four-centered transition
state.3b This restriction does not exist for silicon, and
therefore, catalytic reactions involving the σ-bond me-
tathesis of Si-H bonds (i.e., dehydropolymerization4 and
hydrosilylation5) have been developed.
The neutral dimethyl complex CpCp*HfMe2 (1) does
not react with 1 equiv of PhSiH3 over 1 week in benzene-
d6 (25 °C). In contrast, the cation-like, zwitterionic
complex CpCp*HfMe(µ-Me)B(C6F5)3 (2) reacts with 1
equiv of PhSiH3 over 3 h in benzene-d6 at room tem-
perature to quantitatively form CpCp*HfH(µ-H)B(C6F5)3
(3) and PhMe2SiH (by 1H NMR spectroscopy; eq 1).
During the course of this reaction the intermediate
PhMeSiH2 was observed, and use of 0.5 equiv of PhSiH3
in the reaction resulted in formation of a 1:1 mixture of
Clearly, new metal complexes that are more active
in σ-bond metathesis could greatly expand the set of
useful catalytic reactions associated with this chemistry.
The design of such systems will require a better
understanding of the electronic factors that influence
(1) (a) Watson, P. J .; Parshall, G. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 51.
(b) Rothwell, I. P. Polyhedron 1985, 4, 177. (c) Gell, K. I.; Posin, B.;
Schwartz, J .; Williams, G. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1846.
(2) (a) Lin, Z.; Marks, T. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7979. (b)
J eske, G.; Lauke, H.; Mauermann, H.; Schumann, H.; Marks, T. J . J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 8111. (c) Fagan, P. J .; Manriquez, J . M.;
Maatta, E. A.; Seyam, A. M.; Marks, T. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 6650.
(3) (a) Thompson, M. E.; Baxter, S. M.; Bulls, A. R.; Burger, B. J .;
Nolan, M. C.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Schaefer, W. P.; Bercaw, J . E. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 203. (b) Piers, W. E.; Shapiro, P. J .; Bunel, E.
E.; Bercaw, J . E. Synlett 1990, 74.
(4) (a) Tilley, T. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 22. (b) Woo, H.-G.;
Heyn, R. H.; Tilley, T. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5698. (c) Woo,
H.-G.; Walzer, J . F.; Tilley, T. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7047.
(d) Aitken, C. T.; Harrod, J . F.; Samuel, E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 4059. (e) Woo, H.-G.; Harrod, J . F.; Henique, J .; Samuel, E.
Organometallics 1993, 12, 2883. (f) Aitken, C.; Harrod, J . F.; Samuel,
E. J . Organomet. Chem. 1985, 279, C11. (g) Chang, L. S.; Corey, J . Y.
Organometallics 1989, 8, 1885.
(5) See for example: (a) Fu, P.; Brard, L.; Li, Y.; Marks, T. J . J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7157. (b) Molander, G. A.; Corrette, C. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5011. (c) Gountchev, T. I.; Tilley, T. D.
Organometallics 1999, 18, 5661.
(6) (a) Xang, X.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 10015. (b) J ordan, R. F.; Bajgur, C. S.; Dasher, W. E.; Rheingold,
A. L. Organometallics 1987, 6, 1041. (c) J ordan, R. F.; LaPointe, R.
E.; Bradley, P. K.; Baenziger, N. Organometallics 1989, 8, 2892. (d)
J ordan, R. F.; Taylor, D. F.; Baenziger, N. C. Organometallics 1990,
9, 1546.
(7) Ustynyuk, Yu. A.; Ustynyuk, L. Yu.; Laikov, D. N.; Lunin, V. V.
J . Organomet. Chem. 2000, 597, 182.
(8) (a) Manriquez, J . M.; McAlister, D. R.; Sanner, R. D.; Bercaw,
J . E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2716. (b) Lee, H.; Desrosiers, P. J .;
Guzei, I.; Rheingold, A. L.; Parkin, G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
3255.
(9) Imori, T.; Tilley, T. D. Polyhedron 1994, 13, 2231.
(10) (a) Dioumaev, V. K.; Harrod, J . F. J . Organomet. Chem. 1996,
521, 133. (b) Dioumaev, V. K.; Harrod, J . F. Organometallics 1994,
13, 1548. (c) Dioumaev, V. K.; Harrod, J . F. Organometallics 1996,
15, 3859.
10.1021/om010737c CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 09/27/2001