114
A. Yokosuka et al. / Phytochemistry 101 (2014) 109–115
(Tosoh) or a Shodex OR-2 (Showa-Denko, Tokyo, Japan) detector,
and a Rheodyne injection port. A Capcell pak C18 AQ column
IRA-96SB (Organo, Tokyo, Japan) column and was applied to silica
gel column eluted with CHCl3–MeOH (9:1) followed by MeOH to
yield 1a (2.8 mg) and a sugar fraction (3.0 mg). The sugar fraction
was passed through a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA,
USA), and was then analyzed by HPLC under the following condi-
tions: column, Capcell Pak NH2 UG80 (4.6 mm i.d. Â 250 mm,
(10 mm i.d. Â 250 mm, ODS 5
lm, Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) was used
for preparative HPLC. The following reagents were used: RPMI 1640
medium, MEM and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-
tetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA);
fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Bio-Whittaker, Walkersville, MO, USA);
penicillin G sodium salt and streptomycin sulfate (Meiji-Seika,
Tokyo, Japan). All other chemicals used were of biochemical reagent
grade.
5
l
m, Shiseido); solvent, MeCN–H2O (17:3); flow rate, 0.8 ml/
min; detection, RI and OR. Identification of -galactose and -glu-
D
D
cose present in the sugar fraction was carried out by comparison
of their retention times and optical rotations with those of authen-
tic samples. tR (min): 13.88 (
D-galactose, positive optical rotation),
Plant material
14.84 ( -glucose, positive optical rotation).
D
The plant material, defined as the underground parts of Y. glau-
ca Nutt. ex J. Fraser, was obtained from a wholesale firm in Rich-
ters, Ontario, Canada in 1999. A voucher specimen has been
deposited in our laboratory (voucher No. YG-99-001, Department
of Medicinal Pharmacognosy).
Compound 2
3b-[(O-b-
D
-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-b-D-galactopyranosyl)oxy]-
25
5b-spirost-25(27)-en-12-one; amorphous solid; [
0.10; MeOH); IR
a]
À1.6 (c
D
m
max (film) cmÀ1: 3363 (OH), 2925 (CH), 1705
(C@O), 1077, 1041; 1H NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N): d 4.82 and 4.79
(each 1H, br s, H2-27), 4.55 (1H, m, H-16), 4.46 and 4.04 (each
1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz, H2-26), 4.25 (1H, br s, H-3), 2.82 (dd, J = 8.2,
7.1 Hz, H-17), 2.36 (dd, J = 13.6, 13.6 Hz, H-11a), 2.19 (dd, J = 13.6,
4.8 Hz, H-11b), 1.32 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, Me-21), 1.09 (3H, s,
Me-18), 0.99 (3H, s, Me-19): For 1H NMR spectroscopic data of
the sugar moiety, see Table 1; for 13C NMR (125 MHz, C5D5N) spec-
troscopic data, see Table 2; HRESI–TOFMS m/z: 753.4061 [M+H]+
(calculated for C39H61O14, 753.4061).
Extraction and isolation
The plant material (dry weight 2.0 kg) was extracted with hot
MeOH (2 Â 5 l). The combined MeOH extract was concentrated un-
der reduced pressure, and the viscous concentrate (435 g) was
passed through a Diaion HP-20 column (90 mm i.d. Â 300 mm),
successively eluted with MeOH–H2O (3:7, 5:5), MeOH, EtOH, and
EtOAc (5 l each). Silica gel CC (75 mm i.d. Â 220 mm) of the MeOH
eluted fraction (50 g), and elution with a stepwise gradient mixture
of CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (9:1:0, 40:10:1, 20:10:1, 1:1:0), and finally
with MeOH alone, gave 12 fractions (I–XII). Fraction VI was applied
to an ODS silica gel column eluted with MeCN–H2O (1:2, 2:3, 1:1)
to give 1 (43.5 mg), 6 (315 mg), and 8 (152 mg), respectively. Frac-
tion VIII was separated by ODS silica gel CC eluted with MeOH–
H2O (6:4; 2:1; 7:3; 8:2) to give 2 (10.8 mg), 3 (11.0 mg), 4
(265 mg), 7 (379 mg), 9 (158 mg), 10 (94.7 mg), 11 (6.1 mg), and
12 (9.6 mg). Fraction IX was separated by ODS silica gel CC eluted
with MeCN–H2O (1:4, 1:3, 1:2) to give nine subfractions (IXa–IXi).
Fraction IXb was purified on a silica gel column eluted with CHCl3–
MeOH–H2O (30:10:1, 20:10:1) to give 19 (59 mg). Fraction IXc was
purified on a silica gel column eluted with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O
(20:10:1) to afford 5 (10.0 mg). Fraction IXd was purified by pre-
parative HPLC using MeCN–H2O (1:4) to yield 16 (13.5 mg), 17
(315 mg), and 18 (180 mg). Fraction IXg was purified on a silica
gel column eluted with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (30:10:1) to afford 20
(9.0 mg). Fraction XI was purified on an ODS silica gel column
eluted with MeCN–H2O (1:4, 2:7, 2:5, 2:3) and by preparative HPLC
using MeCN–H2O (1:4) to yield 13 (22.0 mg), 14 (21.5 mg), and 15
(19.0 mg).
Compound 3
3b-[(O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-O-[b-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 ? 3)]-
b-
solid; [a]D À6.8 (c 0.10; MeOH); IR (film) mmax 3376 (OH), 2925
(CH), 1706 (C@O), 1040 cmÀ1 1H NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N) d 4.82
D-galactopyranosyl)oxy]-5b-spirost-25(27)-en-12-one; amorphous
25
;
and 4.78 (each 1H, br s, H2-27), 4.55 (1H, m, H-16), 4.46 and 4.04
(each 1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz, H2-26), 4.24 (1H, br s, H-3), 1.32 (3H, d,
J = 7.0 Hz, Me-21), 1.08 (3H, s, Me-18), 0.96 (3H, s, Me-19), sig-
nals for the sugar moiety, see Table 1; 13C NMR, see Table 2;
HRESI–TOFMS m/z 907.4250 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C44H68
O18Na, 907.4303).
Compound 4
(25R)-3b-[(O-b-
syl-(1 ? 3)]-b- -galactopyranosyl)oxy]-5b-spirostan-12-one; amor-
phous solid; [a]D À8.9 (c 0.10; MeOH); IR (film) mmax 3376 (OH),
2927 (CH), 1706 (C@O), 1074 cmÀ1 1H NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N) d
4.55 (1H, m, H-16), 4.25 (1H, br s, H-3), 3.59 (1H, m, H-26a), 3.49
(1H, dd, J = 10.6, 10.6 Hz, H-26b), 1.57 (1H, m, H-25), 1.36 (3H, d,
J = 6.9 Hz, Me-21), 1.08 (3H, s, Me-18), 0.96 (3H, s, Me-19), 0.70
(3H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, Me-27), signals for the sugar moiety, see Table 1;
13C NMR, see Table 2; HRESI–TOFMS m/z 909.4509 [M+Na]+ (calcd
for C44H70O18Na, 909.4460).
D-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-O-[b-D-xylopyrano-
D
25
;
Compound 1
5b-Spirost-25(27)-en-3b-yl O-b-
galactopyranoside; amorphous solid; [
IR (film) mmax 3347 (OH), 2925 (CH), 1041 cmÀ1
D-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-b-D-
25
a
]
D
À4.4 (c 0.10; MeOH);
;
1H NMR
(500 MHz, C5D5N) d 4.81 and 4.77 (each 1H, br s, H2-27), 4.61
(1H, m, H-16), 4.46 and 4.04 (each 1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz, H2-26), 4.32
(1H, br s, H-3), 1.09 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, Me-21), 0.95 (3H, s, Me-19),
0.81 (3H, s, Me-18), signals for the sugar moiety, see Table 1; 13C
NMR, see Table 2; HRESI–TOFMS m/z: 739.4244 [M+H]+ (calcd for
C39H63O13, 739.4269).
Compound 5
(24R,25S)-3b-[(O-b-
anosyl-(1 ? 3)]-b- -galactopyranosyl)oxy]-24-hydroxy-5b-spiro-
stan-12-one: amorphous solid; [a]D À13.6 (c 0.10; MeOH); IR
D-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-O-[b-D-xylopyr-
D
25
(film) mmax 3377 (OH), 2927 (CH), 1704 (C@O), 1073, 1037 cmÀ1
;
1H NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N) d 4.56 (1H, m, H-16), 4.25 (1H, br s,
H-3), 4.03 (1H, m, H-24), 3.71 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 4.7 Hz, H-26a),
3.60 (1H, dd, J = 11.1, 11.1 Hz, H-26b), 2.33 (1H, dd, J = 12.6,
4.6 Hz, H-23a), 2.02 (1H, dd, J = 12.6, 12.6 Hz, H-23b), 1.85 (1H,
m, H-25), 1.39 (3H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, Me-21), 1.10 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz,
Me-27), 1.07 (3H, s, Me-18), 0.96 (3H, s, Me-19), signals for the
Acid hydrolysis of 1
A solution of 1 (10.2 mg) in 1 M HCl (dioxane-H2O, 1:1; 2 ml)
was heated at 95 °C for 2 h under Ar. After cooling, the reaction
mixture was neutralized by passage through an Amberlite