a broad substrate range including substituted acetophe-
nones,10-13 as well as 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophenone.14-16 Fin-
ally, the catalysts that we screened are synthetically useful
as they are commercially available17 as isolated enzymes and
have been used to deliver multikilograms of optically pure
chiral alcohol.13
Scheme 1. Chemoselective Reductions of Methyl/
Trifluoromethyl Diketones To Produce Hydroxyketonesa
The methyl/trifluoromethyl diketones 1, 2, and 3 were
synthesized by modifying the literature procedure.3 Ketals
were formed from the corresponding bromo-acetophenones
using ethylene glycol and were catalyzed by p-toluene
sulfonic acid. This step was followed by a metal/halogen
exchange using n-hexyl lithium and quench with methyl
trifluoroacetate. Deprotection with 1 N HCl and crystalliza-
tion afforded the trifluoroacetyl-substituted acetophenones
1, 2, and 3 as solids with 60-80% isolated yield. The three
diketones 1, 2, and 3 were screened against a library
consisting of 72 commercially available enzymes in a 96-
well format.17 The o-diketone was isolated as a cyclized
dihydrate 3a (Scheme 1) and found to be inert in all chemical
and enzymatic reactions. The reactions were monitored by
an achiral GC assay to determine the product ratios and
conversions. The ee value of hydroxyketones was determined
by chiral SFC for 4 and 5 and by chiral GC for 7 and 8.
The majority of the ketoreductase library was active toward
the p-diketone 1 and produced the trifluoromethyl hydroxy-
ketone 4 in excess. The enzymes listed in Table 1 showed
the highest chemoselectivity toward the p-diketone. In fact,
49 of the enzymes had a mixture of trifluoromethyl hydroxy-
ketone 4 and bis-alcohol 10 when sampled.
a 3a: The o-diketone was isolated as a cyclized dihydrate and
was inert in all reactions.
ductase enzymes (Scheme 1). This new method of producing
optically pure hydroxyketones eliminates the need to protect
prochiral diketones and allows a more efficient and conver-
gent synthesis. Importantly, we demonstrate a route to (S)-
methyl hydroxyketones (7, 8) which are difficult compounds
to synthesize due to the relative ease of a chemical reduction
of a trifluoromethyl ketone located within five bonds of the
methyl carbonyl.
The chemoselective reduction (Scheme 1) of these com-
pounds is reported in the literature,3 but this reaction has
limited application in the synthesis of pharmaceutical inter-
mediates as it produces racemic hydroxyketones. Synthesiz-
ing chiral trifluoromethyl hydroxyketones by a chemoselec-
tive asymmetric hydrogenation of fluorinated â-diketones
was demonstrated using Pt/Al2O3 and chiral modifiers.4
However, this metal-catalyzed transformation is limited to
reduction of the activated ketone in the â-diketones exam-
ined.
The aim of our research was to demonstrate that keto
reductases can chemo- and stereoselectively differentiate
between methyl and trifluoromethyl ketones within the
same molecule by using p- and m-trifluoroacetyl-substituted
acetophenones. Enzymes are an excellent choice as catalysts
to mediate this chemoselective diketone reduction as the
elaborate chiral environment should be able to differentiate
between the ketones due to the steric and electronic differ-
ences of the carbonyls. However, prior to the results
presented here, there are no examples in the literature of an
enzymatic chemoselective reduction of methyl/trifluoro-
methyl diketones, although there are a number of examples
of enzymes catalyzing the regio- and enantioselective reduc-
tions of substrates such as R-diketones5-7 and â-diketones.7-9
Additionally, these biocatalysts have been shown to have
The results of screening the p-diketone 1 toward the library
demonstrates that by using isolated enzymes one can chemo-
selectively access both enantiomers of the trifluoromethyl
hydroxyketone 4 in high enantiomeric excess. In fact, there
(6) Mahmoodi, N. O.; Mohammadi, H. G. Monatsh. Chem. 2003, 134,
1283-1288.
(7) Edegger, K.; Stampfer, W.; Seisser, B; Faber, K; Mayer, S. F.;
Oehrlein, R.; Hafner, A.; Kroutil, W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1904-
1909.
(8) Muller, M.; Wolberg, M.; Shubert, T.; Hummel, W. AdV. Biochem.
Eng. Biotechnol. 2005, 92, 261-287.
(9) Wolberg, M.; Hummel, W.; Wandrey, C.; Muller, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 23, 4306-4308.
(10) Zhu, D.; Rios, B. D.; Rozzell, J. D.; Hua, L. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1541-1546.
(11) Groger, H.; Hummel, W.; Rollman, C.; Chamouleau, F.; Husken,
H.; Werner, H.; Wunderlich, C.; Abokitse, K.; Drauz, K.; Buchholz, S.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 633-640.
(12) Rosen, T. C.; Feldmann, R.; Dunkelmann, P.; Daubmann, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4803-4806.
(13) Pollard, D.; Truppo, M.; Pollard, J.; Chen, C.; Moore, J. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 554-559.
(14) Yamazaki, Y.; Kobayashi, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 6,
1287-1294.
(15) Bradshaw, C. W.; Hummel, W.; Wong, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 1532-1536.
(16) Caron, D.; Coughlan, A. P.; Simard, M.; Bernier, J.; Piche, Y.;
Chenevert, R. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 713-716.
(17) Isolated enzymes were used as lyophilized solids or liquid prepara-
tions. KRED-XXX enzymes, alcohol dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus
erythropolis (ADH-RE), alcohol dehydrogenase from Candida parapsilosis
(ADH-CP), glucose dehydrogenase-103 (GDH-103), NAD+, NADH, and
NADPH were purchased from Biocatalytics, Inc. (Pasedena, Ca, U.S.A.).
ADH CDX010, ADH CDX013, alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus
breVis (ADH-LB), and alcohol dehydrogenase from Thermoanaerobacter
sp. (ADH T) were purchased from Julich Chiral Solutions, Inc (Julich,
Germany). All chemicals used were certified as reagent grade and purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich and Fisher Scientific. Screening conditions are listed
in Tables 1 and 2 under footnote “a”.
(3) Sasaki, S.; Yamauchi, T.; Kubo, H.; Kanai, M.; Ishii, A.; Higash-
iyama, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1497-1500.
(4) Hess, R.; Diezi, S.; Mallat, T.; Baiker. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2004, 15, 251-257.
(5) Boutante, P.; Mousset, G.; Veschambre, H. New J. Chem. 1998, 247-
251.
4952
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 24, 2007