The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
performed using the crystal structure software packages. All the
parameters, except for those of the hydrogen atoms, were
6
1,62
refined using anisotropic temperature factors.
Crystal data
+
of Na -1, C H BN NaO : F.W. = 1257.69, crystal
7
8
130
2
8
3
dimensions, 0.30 × 0.05 × 0.01 mm , T = 100 K, triclinic
P1 (#2), a = 9.9634(5), b = 12.9623(6), c = 29.9897(15) Å, α
96.640(7), β = 92.811(7), γ = 96.951(7)°, V = 3811.1(3) Å ,
̅
3
=
−
3
−1
Z = 2, Dcalcd = 1.096 g cm , μ = 5.807 cm , 9285 collected,
7
0
350 unique, Rinit = 0.0510, R = 0.0832, R = 0.1559, R =
.2878, and G.O.F = 0.944. The maximum and minimum
1 all w
peaks on the final difference Fourier map corresponded to
−
−
−3
+
0.36e and −0.32e Å , respectively. CCDC-2076312.
3
. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
+
−
3
.1. Ion Recognition Ability of Compound 1 in
Figure 2. Phase transition behavior of solid 1 and Na ·1·B(Ph) . (a)
4
+
−
Solution. The pore radius of the central cavity of [18]-
crown-6 (1.31 Å) is similar to the ion radius (r ) of K (1.38
Å), indicating a high K -binding ability with a pK of 5.46 in
CD CN. The pore size of [18]crown-6 is slightly larger than r
of Na (0.95 Å), and binding to Na decreases the pK value by
one order of magnitude (pK = 4.21) for the K -binding ability.
DSC curves of 1 (black) and Na ·1·B(Ph)
4
(red), where S1, S1′, S2,
+
G, and L represent solid 1, solid 1′, solid 2, glass, and isotopic liquid
i
+
−
+
phases, respectively. (b) POM images of Na ·1·B(Ph) under cross-
4
7
Nicole optical arrangements: the G phase at 250 K (top), the G + S1
3
i
+
+
phase at 310 K (middle), and the S1′ phase at 310 K (bottom).
+
The ion-recognition ability of oligo(ethylene glycol) is 3 or 4
orders of magnitude lower than that of a crown ether of a
similar size. However, conformational freedom of the acyclic
molecular structure of the oligo(ethylene glycol) derivative
depends on the ions. Figure 1a summarizes the change in
cycle up to 373 K (Figure S5). The transition enthalpy changes
(ΔH) were 24.7 and 97.4 kJ mol , respectively. However, the
L−S2 and S2−S1 phase transitions were observed at 330 (ΔH
−
1
7
,8
−
1
−1
= −101.5 kJ mol ) and 320 K (ΔH = −31.5 kJ mol ) in the
cooling process. This supercooling phenomenon exhibited by
1 was consistent with a first-order phase transition behavior.
A complex phase transition behavior was observed for the
chemical shift (δ, ppm) of the C−H proton of 1 (at a fixed
1
concentration of 10 mM) in CDCl −CD CN (v/v = 1/9)
3
3
+
−
+
+
−
upon the addition of Na ·BPh at a Na concentration (c )
Na ·1·B(Ph) salt (red trace in Figure 2a). The melting point
4
+
4
Na
−
of up to 30 mM. The C−H proton signals of 1 were shifted
of Na ·1·B(Ph) was found to be 327 K, with ΔH = −78.1 kJ
−1
1
4
downfield from 3.87 ppm (c = 0 mM) to 3.91 ppm (c = 30
mol , which was about ∼30 K lower than that of solid 1 (357
K). The POM images of the L phase were observed in a
complete dark domain under a cross-Nicole optical arrange-
ment and were consistent with the formation of an isotropic
liquid state. The formation of a liquid crystal phase was not
Na
Na
+
downfield shifts of the C−H proton of 1 were observed upon
1
+
−
+
4
CDCl −CD CN (v/v = 1/9) (Figure S3). Figure 1b shows the
3
3
+
−
ion (M = Na and K) concentration (c )-dependent shift of the
confirmed in the Na ·1·B(Ph) salt, while the viscous L phase
M
4
+
+
δ value (Δδ, ppm) of 1 upon the addition of Na and K ions.
suggested the existence of effective short-range electrostatic
interactions. The formation of cation−anion pairs in the L
phase corresponded to the ionic liquid state at 298 K in the
cooling process, in the temperature range from 390 to 260 K.
+
+
The Δδ values were saturated at high c for both Na and K
M
ions, which was consistent with the first-order binding of 1
+
+
+
with M , that is, 1 + M = M ·1, in the solution phase. The pK
+
+
+
−
values of 1 for Na and K were found to be 4.30 and 3.89,
respectively, upon curve fitting (Figure 1a). Interestingly, the
The supramolecular treatment of Na ·B(Ph) by the addition
4
of 1 formed the ionic liquid state, where the significant
+
+
pK value for Na was higher than that for K . Although both
18]crown-6 and the penta(ethylene glycol) unit of 1 have six
OC H − oxygen atoms, the Na -binding ability of the acyclic
compound 1 was much higher than that of [18]crown-6. The
pK values of pentaglyme for Na and K were 1.52 and 2.20,
respectively, while those of [18]crown-6 for the same cations
were 4.36 and 6.06, respectively, in CH OH. Therefore, the
Na -binding ability of acyclic compound 1 should be much
lowering of melting occurred to decrease the electrostatic
+
[
−
interaction of Na . The birefringence POM image by
+
crystallization was not recovered upon cooling the molten
2
4
+
−
4
+
+
image was obtained (Figure S6). A small phase transition peak
1
4
−1
was observed at 260 K, with ΔH = 25.9 kJ mol . No fluidic
behavior was observed below 260 K and dark POM images
were obtained. Therefore, the phase transition from L to glass
9
,10
3
+
+
−
higher than that of pentaglyme bearing the same number of
(G) occurred in the Na ·1·B(Ph) molten salt via the
4
−
C H O− units within the molecule.
supercooled state below 240 K. The stable G phase at 220 K
was observed around 298 K in the second heating process, and
two endothermic peaks were observed at 283 and 301 K
corresponding to the crystallization of the G phase. The sum of
the ΔH values for the G−S1 and G−S1′ phase transitions was
2
4
3
.2. Phase Transition Behavior. Thermal stability and
+
−
phase transition behavior of 1 and Na ·1·B(Ph) were
4
+
evaluated by TG and DSC. The single crystals of Na ·1·
−
B(Ph) ·(hexane) included 2 mol of the crystallization
4
2
−
1
solvent, hexane, which was rapidly removed at 298 K. Weight
58.3 kJ mol , which is slightly lower than the ΔH value at the
+
−
−1
K, respectively, in the TG curves (Figure S4), suggesting the
slightly higher thermal stability of 1 than the cation−anion
melting point (−78.1 kJ mol ). After the first step, the G−S1
phase transition, both the G and S1 phases coexisted in the
same domain as evident from the simultaneous appearance of
the dark and bright domains in the POM image (Figure 2b,
middle panel). The second step, S1−S1′ crystallization,
resulted in the complete recovery of the bright crystalline
+
−
Na ·1·B(Ph) salt. Figure 2a shows the DSC curves of 1 and
4
+
−
Na ·1·B(Ph) . Solid 1 underwent a phase transition in two
4
stepsS1−S2 at 336 K and S2−L at 357 Kin the heating
6
352
J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 6349−6358