.
Angewandte
Communications
importance of generating free coordination sites at the
palladium catalyst. Catalysis by a heterogeneous palladium
catalyst appears unlikely considering the large differences in
the catalytic activity of the different catalysts investigated
herein and those reported before with different bis(NHC)
ligands.[5c]
Next, we examined a series of oxidants which are well
known to oxidize bromide rapidly under acidic conditions. As
anticipated, we found catalytic turnover with the oxidants
HAuCl4, KMnO4, H2O2, Pb(OAc)4, and F+ reagents. Select-
fluor[10b] gave the same results as K2S2O8. Oxidants with
a lower redox potential than the bromine/bromide redox
couple, but which have been reported to oxidize palladium(0),
such as, for example Cu(OAc)2 + O2, NaVO3, Ag(OTFA), or
tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone, turned out to be completely
inactive!
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism.
inhibition of the reaction on addition of KBr[5b] we decided to
study the influence of halides in the reaction with K2S2O8 as
the oxidant. Consequently, the catalytic activity of a series of
bis(NHC) catalysts with different halogenido counterligands
(Figure 1) was investigated in the reaction with propane.
Peroxodisulfate and polyhalides can react with alkanes
and trifluoroacetic acid by radical pathways.[16,17] To exclude
that carbon-centered radicals participate in the reaction and
À
to check whether polyhalomethanes mediate the C H
functionalization we added the radical-transfer reagents
CBrCl3 and CCl4 in large excess to the reaction mixture
(4.2 mmol catalyst, 210 mmol CX4, 210 mmol K2S2O8, 1 bar
propane, 2.5 mL HOTFA, 608C, 17 h). We did not observe the
formation of considerable amounts of chloro- and bromopro-
pane (CCl4: TON = 16; CCl3Br: TON = 9), as has been
reported for radical mechanisms under comparable reaction
conditions.[18] Furthermore, as the reaction seems not to be
sensitive to the presence of dioxygen, we conclude that
radicals do not play a role during the course of the reaction.
Inspired by the work of Hirao and co-workers,[19] who
showed that vanadium salts catalyze the aerobic oxidation of
bromide under acidic conditions, we then explored the
oxidation of propane in the presence of NaVO3 and dioxygen.
As expected, isopropyl trifluoroacetate formed at 908C in
trifluoroacetic acid (25 mL, HOTFA, 84 mmol 1_Br2;
840 mmol NaVO3, 17 h, 6 bar propane, 4 bar dioxygen:
TON = 3). The addition of related vanadium precatalysts
such as NH4VO3 or VO(OAc)2 led to a comparable level of
catalytic activity. The product distribution obtained matched
the regio- and chemoselectivity when K2S2O8 and Selectfluor
were used as oxidants (Figure 1), although we also identified
the formation of traces of methyl and ethyl trifluoroacetate as
well as isopropyl bromide. During the course of the reox-
idation process, one equivalent of water forms per molecule
Figure 1. Dependence of catalytic activity on counterligands. Reaction
conditions: 4.2 mmol catalyst, 210 mmol K2S2O8, 1 bar propane, 2.5 mL
HOTFA, 608C, 17 h.
We found a comparable catalytic activity for the catalysts
1_Br2 (TON = 18) and 1_Cl2 (TON = 17) but a significantly
lower activity for 1_I2 (TON = 6), while all the catalysts led to
a comparable regio- and chemoselectivity. This is expected, as
bromine and chlorine are known to oxidize 1_Br2 to the
corresponding palladium(IV) complex, whereas the oxidation
strength of iodine is not sufficient for this reaction. The
catalytic activity of 1_(OTFA)2 and Pd(OAc)2 (TON = 5 and
TON = 6) was found to be substantially lower. In those
catalyst systems, and likewise for 1_I2, a different mechanism
for the reoxidation of the palladium centers is clearly
operative. The tetrafluoroborate complex 1_(MeCN)2(BF4)2
with coordinating acetonitrile ligands (TON = 1) as well as
the corresponding platinum complex Pt1_Br2 (TON = 0)
turned out to be inactive. The last result in particular
underlines the significance of the nature of the transition-
metal center.
À
of ester. As described above, water inhibits the C H
activation cycle. We therefore examined the effect of the
addition of trifluoroacetic anhydride (21 mL HOTFA + 4 mL
TFA2O) and found, as expected, a remarkable increase in
activity (908C: TON = 10, 1008C: TON = 12). Only traces of
CO2 were detected at the end of the reaction, which points
toward negligible decomposition of HOTFA by radical
pathways. The catalytic activity is highly preserved at lower
catalyst loadings and TONs of over 60 for the palladium
catalyst could be obtained (Figure 2). The reaction is also
clearly catalytic in NaVO3 (TON = 8). The catalytic activity
remained high after 65 h as long as not too much water had
accumulated in the reaction mixture and not all the dioxygen
had been consumed.
As in the case of methane,[5b] the reaction with propane is
strongly inhibited by the addition of two or five equivalents of
potassium bromide to the reaction mixture (4.2 mmol catalyst,
8.4 mmol or 21 mmol KBr, 210 mmol K2S2O8, 1 bar propane,
2.5 mL HOTFA, 608C, 17 h: TON = 4 and TON = 2) or by the
addition of water. The addition of trifluoroacetic anhydride
only led to a slight inhibition (for details see the Supporting
Information). These observations taken together highlight the
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2485 –2488