chromophores can exhibit potentially undesirable changes in
absorption and fluorescence properties due to dipole-dipole
interactions and additional relaxation pathways.10-12 Applica-
tions involving light harvesting or bright long-lived molecular
probes could benefit from creating tethered packets of chro-
mophores only if these aggregates still exhibit good photosta-
bility and low rates of quenching.13-17 Efforts to control
interactions between tethered chromophores have focused
primarily on the use of rigid linking groups that hold the
chromophoric units at fixed distances.18,19 The approach de-
scribed herein successfully isolates flexibly tethered rhodamine
B ester dyads by binding the cationic chromophoric units in
cucurbit7uril (CB7, shown in Figure 1) hosts resulting in
enhanced fluorescence of these tethered dyads.20
Disrupting Aggregation of Tethered Rhodamine
B Dyads through Inclusion in Cucurbit[7]uril
Ronald L. Halterman,* Jason L. Moore, and Lisa M. Mannel
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UniVersity of
Oklahoma, 620 Parrington OVal, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
ReceiVed December 12, 2007
FIGURE 1. Line drawings of CB7.
Cucurbiturils are pumpkin shaped cyclic oligomers of gly-
coluril that have carbonyl-rimmed portals and a very nonpolar
interior cavity.21,22 Cationic dyes such as alkylviologens,23,24
Hexano- and dodecano-tethered diesters of rhodamine B were
prepared. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of these
flexibly tethered dyads were compared with those of the
rhodamine 3B ethyl ester. Increased J- and H-type dimer
formation and decreased fluorescence emission were ob-
served for the tethered dyads. Complexation of the cationic
chromophoric units in cucurbit[7]uril (CB7) hosts decreased
H-dimer aggregation, especially for the dodecano-tethered
dyad. The monomeric dye and both dye dyads exhibited
enhanced fluorescence upon addition of CB7.
(8) Keeling-Tucker, T.; Brennan, J. D. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 3331-
3350.
(9) Gao, X. H.; Yang, L. L.; Petros, J. A.; Marshal, F. F.; Simons, J.
W.; Nie, S. M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 63-72.
(10) Tinnefeld, P.; Buschmann, V.; Weston, K. D.; Sauer, M. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2003, 107, 323-327.
(11) Lenhart, J. L.; van Zanten, J. H.; Dunkers, J. P.; Zimba, C. G.; James,
C. A.; Pollack, S. K.; Parnas, R. S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 221,
75-86.
(12) Vosch, T.; Hofkens, J.; Cotlet, M.; Ko¨hn, F.; Fujiwara, H.; Gronheid,
R.; van der Biest, K.; Weil, T.; Herrmann, A.; Mu¨llen, K.; Mukamel, S.;
van der Auweraer, M.; de Schryver, F. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 4643-4648.
(13) Gutierrez, M. C.; Hortiguela, M. J.; Ferrer, M. L.; delMonte, F.
Langmuir 2007, 23, 2175-2179.
Xanthenes such as the various rhodamines are important not
only as laser dyes1 but increasingly as components of fluorescent
probes in aqueous media.2,3 Concerns regarding the aggregation
of rhodamines and the effects of aggregation on the photo-
physical properties of these dyes are part of larger questions
regarding interactions between tethered chromophores in mul-
tichromophoric light harvesting systems4-6 and fluorescent
probes.1,7-9 When aggregated or tethered to one another,
(14) Gratzel, M. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 6841-6851.
(15) Bisquert, J.; Garcia-Can˜adas, J.; Mora-Sero´, I.; Palomares, E. Proc.
SPIE 2004, 5215, 49-59.
(16) Lee, T.-H.; Gonzalez, J. I.; Zheng, J.; Dickson, R. M. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2005, 38, 534-541.
(17) Yeow, E. K. L.; Melnikov, S. M.; Bell, T. D. M.; DeSchryver, F.
C.; Hofkens, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 1726-1734.
(18) de Schryver, F. C.; Vosch, T.; Cotlet, M.; van der Auweraer, M.;
Mu¨llen, K.; Hofkens, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 514-522.
(19) Vosch, T.; Cotlet, M.; Hofkens, J.; VanDerBiest, K.; Lor, M.;
Weston, K.; Tinnefeld, P.; Sauer, M.; Latterini, L.; Mullen, K.; DeSchryver,
F. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 6920-6931.
(1) Ojeda, P. R.; Amashta, I. A. K.; Ochoa, J. R.; Arbeloa, I. L. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1988, 84, 1-8.
(20) Halterman, R. L.; Moore, J. L.; Woodson, K. A.; Mannel, L., M.;
Colson, J. W.; Miller, A. R.; Yip, W. T. In 234th ACS National Meeting;
American Chemical Society: Boston, MA, 2007.
(21) Lagona, J.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Chakrabarti, S.; Isaacs, L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4844-4870.
(22) Liu, S. M.; Ruspic, C.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Chakrabarti, S.; Zavalij,
P. Y.; Isaacs, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15959-15967.
(23) Ong, W.; Gomez-Kaifer, M.; Kaifer, A. E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1791-
1794.
(24) Kim, H.-J.; Jeon, W. S.; Ko, Y. H.; Kim, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5007-5011.
(2) Meier, J. L.; Mercer, A. C.; Rivera, H.; Burkart, M. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 12174-12184.
(3) Santra, S.; Dutta, D.; Moudgil, B. M. Food Bioprod. Process. 2005,
83, 136-140.
(4) Halaoui, L. I.; Abrams, N. M.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,
109, 6334-6342.
(5) Gvishi, R.; Narang, U.; Ruland, G.; Kumar, D. N.; Prasad, P. N.
Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 11, 107-127.
(6) Gfeller, N.; Calzaferri, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 1396-1408.
(7) Rohatgi, K. K.; Singhal, G. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1966, 70, 1695-1701.
10.1021/jo7026432 CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/27/2008
3266
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3266-3269