enantioselective catalyst for the addition of alkyl groups to
aryl alkyl ketones6 and R,â-unsaturated cyclic enones.7
Ligand 1 is readily synthesized in two steps from com-
mercially available materials and can be used in as little as
2 mol % loading.6 After our report detailing the synthesis
and application of 1 to the catalytic asymmetric addition of
alkyl groups to ketones,6 Yus and co-workers published a
similar study using the same ligand.8 Our success with ligand
1 in the alkyl additions led us to examine the enantioselective
arylation of ketones with ZnPh2, and we were pleased to
find that the results were again excellent across a range of
substrates. The products of these reactions are tertiary
alcohols that possess chiral quaternary centers. Such stereo-
centers are difficult to install in an asymmetric fashion with
high enantioselectivity. During the preparation of the current
manuscript, Yus published the use of 1 in the arylation of
4′-substituted acetophenones and 4′-bromopropiophenone,11
prompting us to report our independent investigations that
define the scope of the phenyl addition to ketones with ligand
1.
Table 1. Examination of the Effects of Solvents and
Temperature on the Yield and Enantioselectivity of the
Phenylation of 3′-Chloropropiophenone
entry
solvent
T (°C)
yield (%)
ee (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
toluene/hexanes
toluene/hexanes
toluene
hexanes
Et2O
Et2O/hexanes
THF/hexanes
THF/CH2Cl2
toluene/methanol
22
0
99
57
99
99
81
88
NR
NR
NR
87
65
89
87
92
91
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
a Conditions for all ee determinations are in Supporting Information.
outlined in Table 1. In our initial experiments, we used
conditions similar to those in our asymmetric alkylations of
ketones. Employing 10 mol % 1, 1.2 equiv of titanium
tetraisopropoxide, and 1.6 equiv of diphenylzinc in a mixture
of toluene and hexanes at room-temperature resulted in
formation of the product with 99% isolated yield and in 87%
enantioselectivity after 18 h (entry 1). Unfortunately, lower-
ing the temperature to 0 °C led to significant decrease in
both product ee and yield (entry 2). Use of toluene alone
resulted in a slight increase in the product ee to 89%, while
hexanes alone resulted in no change (entries 3 and 4). Diethyl
ether gave product of 92% ee, but the yield dropped to 81%.
Combination of diethyl ether and hexanes gave higher yield
(88%) with little change in product ee (91%). No reaction
was observed when the Lewis basic THF was employed or
methanol was added in a fashion similar to the report of Dosa
and Fu.3 These studies indicate that the catalyst enantiose-
lectivity remains high with a variety of solvents.
The first catalytic enantioselective phenyl addition to
ketones was reported by Dosa and Fu in 1998.3 In this
pioneering work, these authors employed Noyori’s (+)-DAIB
ligand12,13 and diphenylzinc. Although direct use of diphe-
nylzinc gave low yields, addition of methanol to the
diphenylzinc solution resulted in formation of a mixed alkoxy
phenyl zinc reagent that gave increased yields and enantio-
selectivities, as shown in Figure 2.3 In contrast, diphenylzinc
The next step in our optimization involved variation of
the reagent stoichiometry, as detailed in Table 2. Using
toluene and hexanes, we initially varied the amount of
titanium tetraisopropoxide and ligand 1 (entries 1-7).
Decreasing the titanium tetraisopropoxide to 0.6 equiv led
Figure 2. Results of Dosa and Fu in the asymmetric addition of
phenyl groups to ketones.
and alkyl phenyl zinc reagents can be used in the additions
to aldehydes.14-20
(13) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New
York, 1994.
(14) Dosa, P. I.; Ruble, J. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 444-
In our study, we chose 3′-chloropropiophenone as the test
substrate for optimization of the reaction parameters, as
445.
(15) Bolm, C.; Hermanns, N.; Hildebrand, J. P.; Mun˜iz, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3465-3467.
(9) Ho, D. E.; Betancort, J. M.; Woodmansee, D. H.; Larter, M. L.;
Walsh, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3867-3870.
(10) Guo, C.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, X.; Verdugo, D.; Larter, M. L.; Christie,
R.; Kenney, P.; Walsh, P. J. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4145-4158.
(11) Prieto, O.; Ramo´n, D. J.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003,
14, 1955-1957.
(16) Rudolph, J.; Rasmussen, T.; Bolm, C.; Norrby, P.-O. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3002-3005.
(17) Huang, W.-S.; Pu, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 145-148.
(18) Zhao, G.; Lib, X.-Z.; Wang, X.-R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001,
12, 399-403.
(19) Ko, D.-H.; Kim, K. H.; Ha, D.-C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3759-3762.
(20) Bolm, C.; Hildebrand, J. P.; Mun˜iz, K.; Hermanns, N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3284-3308.
(12) Kitamura, M.; Suga, S.; Kawai, K.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 6071-6072.
3642
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 20, 2003