Energy Transport in Model Dendritic Structures
A R T I C L E S
of optically active subunits. These two features are also very
promising for creating molecular electronic devices.
nature of these interactions can be investigated by use of
fluorescence anisotropy, which is a powerful method in
characterizing the energy migration in particular multichro-
The fundamental challenge in dendrimer macromolecular
photophysics is the understanding of the photoexcitation energy
transfer between subunits and the degree of the excitation
delocalization. In most cases, the branching center in dendrimers
disrupts the conjugation, thus suggesting the dendrimer molecule
to be an ensemble of linear chromophores with no (or weak)
charge transfer between them. If such a charge transfer is
completely eliminated, and consequently the linear-segment
chromophores are well separated, then their interactions are
purely Coulombic. This explains the characterization of interac-
tions in the dendrimer molecule by a Frenkel exciton Hamil-
4
,11,12
mophore systems.
By using fluorescence depolarization,
it is possible to observe this intramolecular excitation transfer
because the latter process is accompanied by the reorientation
of the transition dipole resulting in depolarization of the
emission. Theoretical treatments of time-resolved polarized
emission from coherently excited chromophore pairs (and single
molecules with degenerate electronic transitions) showed that
the initial anisotropy can exceed the normally observed value
for a single chromophore of 0.4, before dephasing is initiated.11
Oscillations in optical anisotropy can be observed as a result
7
11,13
tonian. Recent theoretical studies on phenyl-acetylene den-
of the beating between excitonic levels.
However, in most
drimers showed that the charge coherence between linear
segments is negligibly small and that the Frenkel exciton
approximation is applicable for this system. There have been
experiments, the observed oscillations were assigned to the
vibrational wave packets formed by vibrationally impulsive
excitations. To actually observe the beatings between excitonic
levels for any particular system, the splitting parameter (interac-
tion strength) should fall in a narrow window of opportunity
between the limited experimental time resolution and the fast
dephasing. This condition, while theoretically viable, may not
be easily satisfied for many aggregated systems for which the
excitonic splitting is not exactly known.
7
no other reports regarding the effect of extended conjugation
on the energy migration process for other types of conjugated
dendrimers (branching centers). Furthermore, even if the charge
coherence between linear conjugated segments is negligible,
many important questions regarding the excited-state dynamics
and excitation energy transfer mechanisms in many important
synthetic dendrimer systems remain unanswered. Resonance
interactions between conjugated segments favor delocalized
Frenkel Hamiltonian eigenstates. This leads to coherent mech-
anisms of excitation energy transfer, which are maintained over
the duration of time during which well-defined phase relation-
ships between segments are preserved. Interactions with the
surrounding environment and with molecular nuclear motion,
however, destroy this phase coherence and stabilize localized
excitations. In the last case, the energy transfer between
dephased fragments may then occur in a random stochastic
However, there is also very important information in the
decay time and shape of the optical anisotropy. The anisotropy
decay time combined with isotropic dynamics and steady-state
spectroscopic information can be correlated with the excitation
energy migration (or redistribution) time in the aggregates
1
b,4
organized about a rotational axis.
In the limit of incoherent
interactions the anisotropy decay time is directly related to the
hopping time (interaction strength) between adjacent chromo-
4b,11a,14
phores.
In the excitonic limit this decay is associated with
the transition between the excitonic states possessing different
1
0
1e,11,13
fashion (hopping mechanism or weak interaction limit ). Both
interactions can be significant in dendrimers, and their relative
magnitudes will determine the contributions of coherent and
incoherent mechanisms to the dynamics of energy transfer. This
is an important issue concerning numerous promising applica-
directions of transition dipoles.
It is worth noting that for
the aggregated systems with axial symmetry (if it is not broken
after excitation) the excitonic levels with strong enough oscil-
lator strength remain doubly degenerated with different orienta-
2
a,4b
tion of the dipoles for each state.
The optical anisotropy
8a,b
8c,d
tions of dendrimers (artificial light antennas,
LEDs,
decay associated with mutual dephasing and population ex-
change between these two states which is driven by interactions
with random electric fields of the solvent molecules or dynami-
8
e
nonlinear optics ). Also, the question of coherence in dendri-
mers is an important fundamental problem. For example, it is
suggested that the photophysical processes are strongly affected
by geometrical confinement in dendrimers. However, neither
the dephasing rate nor the resonance interaction strength has
been experimentally measured for real conjugated dendritic
systems. For diphenylacetylene segments connected at meta-
positions, the interaction strength was theoretically estimated
1
e,11,15,16
cal breaking of the symmetry can be very fast.
The
anisotropy dynamics in a transition area between these two limits
4
c,13
can be modeled either numerically
or, with some restrictions,
1
7
analytically. Many parameters about the molecule itself and
solute-bath interactions are required to perform such modeling.
For natural photosynthetic systems, many of them have been
to be about 69 cm- (347 cm for longer segments), but this
1
-1
established in the course of many years of investigations.
1b,4
7
value was not independently estimated experimentally.
For new synthetic macromolecular systems (such as dendrimers),
most of the important physical quantities associated with a fast
depolarization process are still to be discovered.
To address the complicated problem of the excitation energy
transfer dynamics in dendritic systems in a meaningful way, a
simple dendritic model system (one branching center) may be
investigated. In this case, each component of the branching
center (each conjugated linear segment) either can be excited
by another segment or can transfer the excitation energy to the
other segments of the branching center. The interactions between
the chromophores at a branching center are strongly influenced
by the electronic and structural connectivity at the branch. The
(
11) (a) Knox, R.; Gulen, D. Photochem. Photobiol. 1993, 57, 40. (b) Wynne,
K.; Hochstrasser, R. M. Chem. Phys. 1993, 171, 2897.
(
12) Varnavski, O.; Menkir, G.; Beavington, R.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Lupton, J.;
Burn, P.; Goodson, T., III. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 78, 1120. Varnavsky,
O.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Palsson, L. O.; Burn, P.; Goodson, T., III. J. Chem.
Phys., submitted.
(
13) Savikhin, S.; Buck, D. R.; Struve, W. S. Chem. Phys. 1997, 223, 303.
14) Latterini, L.; De Belder, G.; Schweitzer, G.; Van der Auweraer, M.; De
Schryver, F. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 295, 11.
(
(15) (a) Yeh, A. T.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Science 2000, 289, 935. (b)
Schoenlein, R. W.; Bigot, J.-Y.; Portella, M. T.; Shank, C. V. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1991, 58, 801.
(16) Ferro, A. A.; Jonas, D. M. J. Chem. Phys., submitted.
(17) Leegwater, J. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 14403.
(
9) (a) Tomalia, D. A.; Naylor, A. N.; Goddard, W. A., III. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 138. (b) Frechet, J. M. J. Science 1994, 263, 1710.
(
10) Simpson, W. T.; Peterson, D. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 588.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 8, 2002 1737