polarity and molar fraction of all the components) imply that these
systems must be constructed and fine-tuned for each particular
case.
Issues still open include whether the nanoparticles, or rather a
soluble form of palladium in equilibrium with them, are the active
catalytic species.2 We feel this may not be a problem since we have
demonstrated that Pd is not present in catalytically significant
amounts in the organic phase. Another issue is the tendency of the
Pd particles to aggregate. Although the catalytic efficiency is only
slightly reduced with each recycling sequence, it is probable that
this aggregation is responsible for the progressive deactivation.
This aggregation is likely due to the observed progressive loss of
decanol—i.e. of its nanoparticle stabilising effect—that slowly
leaches to the organic phase.5g,15
Fig. 5 HREM of the specimen after the first run.
face atoms on the flat surface promoted concurrent reduction of
both functional groups.5b,12
In view of efficiently segregating the Pd in the catalyst-philic
phase, it was important to determine whether any metal leaching
to the organic phase was occurring. Leaching was monitored after
run 2 and run 4, by filtering the organic phase, adding
4-chloroacetophenone as reagent, and stirring the organic phase
under hydrogen.13 No traces of acetophenone, the hydrodehalo-
genation product, were observed in either case. This indicated that
none of the hydrodehalogenation-catalysing Pd nanoparticles
leached to isooctane. Any leaching of Pd in the inorganic phase
was not monitored since it did not affect the outcome of the
reactions, the aqueous phase was in fact always retained in the
recycling experiments.
Notes and references
{ Experimental note. The standard triphasic catalytic system was made by
loading 1.0 ml of TOMAC, 9.0 ml isooctane, 0.10 ml 1-decanol and 2.0 ml
KOH(aq) (20%) (for the Heck reaction the latter was substituted by 5.0 ml
of 6% NaHCO3(aq)) in a three necked flask. To this were added
0.025 mmol of Pd(PPh3)4, and the reaction stirred under air for 1 h until the
middle phase turned completely black. The substrate was added (1.0 mmol
4-chloropropiophenone for HDX, or 1.0 mmol PhI and 1.5 mmol ethyl
acrylate for the Heck reaction) and the reaction products monitored by
GC-MS.
TEM measurements were performed using a JEM 3010 (JEOL) electron
microscope operating at 300 kV; the lens parameters were Cs = 0.6 mm, Cc
= 1.3 mm, giving a point resolution of 0.17 nm at Scherzer defocus. A few
milligrams of the specimen were sonicated for 5 min in order to disrupt
possible agglomerates. A 5 mL droplet of suspension was transferred onto
an amorphous carbon film, coating a 200 mesh copper grid, dried at room
temperature, and then put into the microscope.
The scope of the same triphasic catalytic system was then
extended by testing its activity for the Pd-catalysed Heck coupling
reaction of phenyl iodide with ethyl acrylate in the presence of
NaHCO3 as the base (eqn (2)).14 At 80 uC after 1 h, 95%
conversion to the coupling product ethyl cinnamate was observed.
In this case the system showed a clear separation of the phases at
the end, and no leaching of Pd into the organic phase was detected.
1 M. T. Reetz, W. Helbig, S. A. Quaiser, U. Stimming, N. Breuer and
R. Vogel, Science, 1995, 267, 367–369.
2 M. T. Reetz and J. G. de Vries, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1559–1563 and
references therein.
3 P.-F. Ho and K.-M. Chi, Nanotechnology, 2004, 15, 1059–1064.
4 P. Tundo and A. Perosa, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, DOI: 10.1039/
bB503021h.
ð2Þ
5 (a) M. Selva, P. Tundo and A. Perosa, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
3266–3271; (b) A. Perosa, M. Selva and P. Tundo, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
64, 3934–3939; (c) P. Tundo, S. Zinovyev and A. Perosa, J. Catal., 2000,
196, 330–338; (d) S. S. Zinovyev, A. Perosa, S. Yufit and P. Tundo,
J. Catal., 2002, 211, 347–354; (e) A. Perosa, P. Tundo and S. S. Zinovyev,
Green Chem., 2002, 4, 492–494; (f) S. S. Zinovyev, A. Perosa and
P. Tundo, J. Catal., 2004, 226, 9–15; (g) A. Perosa, P. Tundo, M. Selva,
S. S. Zinovyev and A. Testa, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 2249–2252.
6 (a) P. Tundo and A. Perosa, React. Funct. Polym., 2003, 54, 95–101; (b)
P. Tundo, A. Perosa and S. S. Zinovyev, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2003,
204–205, 747–754.
The size of the Pd particles was then determined by TEM
measurements. Fig. 5 shows two HREM images of the catalyst-
philic phase from the HDX reaction (after run 1), taken at
different magnification (400 k and 1 M). Rounded crystalline Pd
particles, with no defects, are present with size ranging from 2 to 4
nm. The particles are well dispersed, isolated, and with no
formation of agglomerates. Some of the particles show lattice
fringes corresponding to Pd–Pd distances; in some case the lattice
fringes are not visible due to the covering by TOMAC.
7 V. Gewin, Nature, 2006, 440, 378–379.
8 K. Sato, M. Aoki, M. Ogawa, T. Hashimoto and R. Noyori, J. Org.
Chem., 1995, 61, 8310–8311.
This communication shows that it is possible to use multiphasic
solvent systems to generate highly dispersed Pd nanoparticles that
are active, and selective, for catalysis. Since separation of catalytic
particles from a reaction mixture is a practical problem, the system
was designed to segregate these particles in a catalyst-philic
phase—thus allowing reuse of the catalyst. It represents an
approach towards the development of catalytic systems that are in
a different phase from the reaction species, thereby simplifying
purification of the product, catalyst re-use, and reducing the
amount of energy used and of waste produced. Caution should of
course be used in this respect since the number of variables
affecting the formation of the third catalyst-philic phase (e.g. the
¨
9 Z. Do¨vyap, E. Bayraktar and U. Mehmetog˘lu, Enzyme Microb.
Technol., 2006, 38, 557–562.
10 A. Martino, M. Stoker, M. Hicks, C. H. Bartholomew, A. G. Sault and
J. S. Kawola, Appl. Catal., A, 1997, 161, 235–248.
11 R. K. Herz, W. D. Gillespie, E. E. Petersen and G. A. Samorjai,
J. Catal., 1981, 67, 371–386.
12 R. L. Augustine, Heterogeneous catalysis for the synthetic chemist,
Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, ch. 3, 1996.
13 R. A. Sheldon, M. Wallau, I. W. C. E. Arends and U. Schuchardt, Acc.
Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 485–493.
14 V. Calo`, A. Nacci, A. Monopoli, S. Laera and N. Cioffi, J. Org. Chem.,
2003, 68, 2929–2933.
15 Small amounts of 1-decanol were detected in the organic phases by
GC-MS.
4482 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 4480–4482
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006