2712
G.-F. Dai et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 2710–2713
R2
O
Acknowledgment
O
21
R1
O
O
O
This work was supported by the National Science Foun-
dation of China (No. 20472075).
O
a
b
O
HO
HO
HO
O
H
HO
HO
13
H
References and notes
HO
25
26-28
1. Bernack, R. J.; Niedbala, M. J.; korytnyk, W. Cancer
Metastasis Rev. 1985, 4, 81.
2. Pili, R.; Chang, J.; Partis, R. A.; Mueller, R. A.; Chrest, F.
J.; Passaniti, A. Cancer Res 1995, 55, 2920.
3. Humphries, M. J.; Matsumoto, K.; White, S. L.; Olden,
K. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 5215.
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) m-CPBA, CHCl3, refluxing,
2 h, and yield 95%; (b) methanol, Na2CO3, aldehyde, refluxing, yield
70–85%. 26: R1 = CH3, R2 = CH3; 27: R1 = H, R2 = 4-MeOC6H4; 28:
R1 = H, R2 = CHCHC6H5.
4. Papandreou, M. J.; Barbouche, R.; Guieu, R.; Kieny, M.
P.; Fenouillet, E. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 186.
5. Ouzounov, S.; Mehta, A.; Dwek, R. A.; Block, T. M.;
Jordan, R. Antiviral Res. 2002, 55, 425.
6. Schnidt, D. D.; Frommer, W.; Junge, B.; Muller, L.;
Wingender, W.; Truschei, E.; Schafer, D. Naturwissen-
schaften 1977, 64, 535.
7. Kameda, Y.; Asano, N.; Yoshikawa, M.; Takeucki, M.;
Yamaguchi, T.; Matsui, K.; Horii, S.; Fukase, H.
J. Antibiot. 1984, 37, 1301.
8. Robinson, K. M.; Begovic, M. E.; Rhinehart, B. L.;
Heineke, E. W.; Ducep, J. B.; Kastner, P. R.; Marshall, F.
N.; Danzin, C. Diabetes 1991, 40, 825.
Table 3. Inhibitory activities of analogues of andrographolide
Compound
a-Glucosidase
b-Glucosidase
25
26
27
28
nic
ndd
nd
nd
nd
ni
37.7a(120b)
49.2a (101b)
a Inhibition(%) determined at 100 lM concentration of compound.
b IC50 (lM).
c No inhibition at 100 lM.
d Not determined.
9. Fujisawa, T.; Ikegami, H.; Inoue, K.; Kawabata, Y.;
Ogihara, T. Metabolism 2005, 54, 387.
10. Van den Broek, L. A.; Kat-Van Den Nieuwenhof, M. W.;
Butters, T. D.; Van Boeckel, C. A. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.
1996, 48, 172.
11. Taki, T.; Kuroyanagi, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Fukushima,
S.; Maeda, H.; Sato, M. JP Patent 63088124 A2,
1988.
12. Abeysekera, A. M.; De Silva, K. T. D.; Silva, W. S. J.;
Ratnayake, S.; Labadie, R. P. Fitoterapia 1988, 59, 501.
13. Zhang, C. Y.; Tan, B. K. Phytother. Res. 1999, 13, 157.
14. Sabu, K. K.; Padmesh, P.; Seeni, S. J. Med. Aromatic
Plant Sci. 2001, 23, 637.
determined for b-glucosidase inhibitory activities
showed no inhibitory activities. The results for the struc-
ture–activity relationship studies showed that increasing
the lipophilicity by protection of 3,19-hydroxyls of
andrographolide endows compound 1 with a-glucosi-
dase inhibitory activity. The number and position of ole-
fin bonds between the c-butyrolactone moiety and the
six-membered rings were detrimental to the inhibition
effect. In general, 15-ene-substituted derivatives of 14-
deoxy-11,12,13,14-tetradehydroandrographolide signifi-
cantly increased the a-glucosidase inhibitory activities.
Epoxidation of the exocyclic double bond makes the
inhibitory activity reduced or lost.
15. Zhang, W. Chinese Patent, CN 1266699, 2000.;
16. Gupta, S.; Choudhry, M. A.; Yadava, J. N. S.;
Srivastava, V.; Tandon, J. S. Int. J. Crude Drug Res.
1990, 28, 273.
Bioactivity studies suggest that probably compounds 13
and 17 with a-glucosidase inhibitory activities may play
an important role in the plant extracts exerting antidia-
betic effect. Zhang’s and Yu’s results showed that etha-
nolic extract of A. paniculata or andrographolide can
lower plasma glucose.26,27,39 That means andrographo-
lide without glucosidase inhibitory activity may also ex-
ert antidiabetic effect. According to He’s result,40 13 is
one of the andrographolide metabolites isolated from
rat urine, faeces, and the contents of the small intestine.
So it can be deduced that the andrographolide may exert
antidiabetic effect through inhibiting glucosidase after
being metabolized to 13, an a-glucosidase inhibitor in vi-
vo. In other words, a-glucosidase inhibitory activity was
the reason or at least one of the reasons that the constit-
uents of A. paniculata had antidiabetic effects. The pro-
motion of the glucose metabolism was found when
treating diabetic rat with the plant extract or androgra-
pholide.27,39 So, it can be deduced that extracts of A.
paniculata and andrographolide lower plasma glucose
by inhibiting the disaccharide metabolism and/or pro-
moting the glucose metabolism.
17. Babish, J.G.; Howell, T.; Pacioretty, L. U.S. Patent,
20020068098, 2002.;
18. Madav, S.; Tanda, S. K.; Lal, J.; Tripathi, H. C.
Fitoterapia 1996, 67, 452.
19. Misra, P.; Pal, N. L.; Guru, P. Y.; Katiyar, J. C.;
Srivastava, V.; Tandon, J. S. Int. J. Pharmacognosy 1992,
30, 263.
20. Najib, N. A. R. N.; Furuta, T.; Kojima, S.; Takane, K.;
Ali, M. M. J. Ethnopharmocol. 1999, 64, 249.
21. Puri, A.; Saxena, R. P.; Saxena, K. C.; Srivastava, V.;
Tandon, J. S. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 995.
22. Chiou, W. F.; Lin, J. J.; Chen, C. F. Br. J. Pharmacol.
1998, 125, 327.
23. Saraswat, B.; Visen, P. K.; Patnaik, G. K.; Dhawan, B. N.
Fitoterapia 1995, 66, 415.
24. Nanduri, S.; Rajagopal, S.; Akella, V. WO 2001-1B737,
2001.;
25. Ahmed, M.; Talukder, S. A. Pharm. J. 1977, 6, 21.
26. Zhang, X. F.; Tan, B. K. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.
2000, 27, 358.
27. Zhang, X. F.; Tan, B. K. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2000, 21,
1157.
28. Rafidah, H.; Azimahtol, H. P.; Meenakshii, N. J. Ethno-
pharmacol. 2004, 95, 205.