1494 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 5, 2002
Malnar et al.
structures 1-TS and 2-TS, a positive charge on the
reaction center C2 is the largest.
The value of the most reliable parameter for 3, the
secondary â-deuterium KIE, is considerably smaller than
that observed for the simple π-participation of 1 but is
larger than the KIE obtained for the referent chloride 7.
Considering that the KIE is here interpreted as a
measure of the charge on the reaction center in the
transition state (methyl groups adjacent to the reaction
center have free rotation), it can be concluded that the
partial charge on the reaction center (C2) in 3-TS is
substantially lower than in 1-TS, but it is also larger than
the charge on the reaction center in the referent 7-TS.
The results obtained in the solvolysis of 3 indicate that
both double bonds take part in the rate-determining step
in the solvolysis of 3. However, the charge in 3-TS is
distributed differently than in 7-TS, i.e., the carbon C2
is more positively charged than in the referent 7-TS.
Efficient charge delocalization could occur from the
optimal preorganized structure, which cannot probably
be achieved in 3-TS because of the angle strain (between
C1, C2, C3, and C4). Similar angle strain is negligible in
7-TS in which the corresponding ring is five-membered.
Therefore, in solvolysis of the model 7, the participation
of the second double bond is more important, the positive
charge is more effectively delocalized, and 7 solvolyzes
with a smaller â-deuterium KIE than 3. The results
obtained could also be interpreted in terms of “early” and
“late” transition states. Unlike with the monounsaturated
models, the “earlier” transition state exists in the case
of 3 and the “later” in the case of 7.
In calculated carbocation intermediates 1-C and 2-C
the positive charge is mainly transferred to the tertiary
carbon atomcs C5 and C6, respectively (Figure 1).
Similarly as in the transition structures, the C2-C5 and
C2-C6 distances are shorter in 1-C than the correspond-
ing C2-C6 and C2-C7 distances in 2-C. Nevertheless,
because of the removal of the positive charge from the
reaction center, cyclized product would be expected,
which is not a case. Despite the theoretical findings, the
lack of the cyclized products is not surprising. That
discrepancy comes from the fact that the solvolyses were
carried out in highly polar solvents (80E and 97T), while
all reported calculations are for the isolated ion in the
gas phase. The solvation effect on all species is not
equally important. While the solvation of the starting
chloride is not significant, the solvation of the positively
charged intermediate is very pronounced. Consequently,
the difference between the computed carbocation struc-
ture in the gas phase and under experimental conditions
is the largest. The results obtained by theoretical calcula-
tion (SCRF)PCM model at the MP2/6-31G(d) level)
clearly support the above assumption about the impor-
tance of the solvation effect in the transition state. In
both cases solvation effects are negligible with chlorides
1 and 2 (∆Gsolv under 1 kcal/mol), while the transition
states 1-TS and 2-TS are stabilized for 27 and 19 kcal/
mol, respectively. Similar trends were recently obtained
by Sorensen et al. in solvation simulation calculations
for the camphenyl and other reference systems.21 It is
well-known that the ion pairs play an important role in
such reactions, so the large fraction of elimination
products might be rationalized if the basicity of the
chloride ion is considered. The chloride can act as a base
and eliminate the hydrogen in its vicinity, yielding the
elimination instead of the cyclized products.
Exp er im en ta l Section
1
Gen er a l. H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 300
MHz spectrometer using CDCl3 as solvent, and IR spectra were
recorded on neat compounds.
Esters 5 and 6 were prepared according to the procedures
described by le Noble et al.,11a which include J ohnson’s
introduction of trans-trisubstituted double bond(s).11b
2,5-Dim eth yl-5(E)-h ep ten -2-ol. The Grignard reagent,
prepared from Mg (1.2 g, 50 mmol) and methyl iodide (7.1 g,
50 mmol) in THF (15 mL), was cooled to 0 °C, and the solution
of ethyl 4-methyl-4(E)-hexenoate (5) (3.88 g, 25 mmol) in 20
mL of THF was added dropwise. The stirring was continued
at room temperature for 1 h. The Grignard complex was
hydrolyzed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl. The water layer
was washed with ether three times, and the combined ether
layers were washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The
crude product was distilled under reduced pressure yielding,
Exten d ed π-P a r ticip a tion . The values of activation
parameters and â-deuterium KIE of 3 show that its
solvolytic behavior is different than that of 1 (and 2),
indicating a different reaction mechanism in the solvoly-
sis of 3. Let us examine how the results obtained would
fit if it is presumed that both double bonds take part in
the rate-determining step. Extended π-electron delocal-
ization should cause further lowering of ∆Hq, which is
the case (Table 1). The presumed extended π-participa-
tion mechanism requires a certain conformation in the
transition state, which demands a considerably high
degree of order, and therefore a very negative ∆Sq. Both
values of ∆Sq obtained for 3 (∆Sq ) -152 ( 12 J mol-1
K-1, 80E; ∆Sq ) -123 ( 1 J mol-1 K-1, 97T) and for 7
(∆Sq ) -118 ( 6 J mol-1 K-1; 80E)18 are dramatically
reduced in comparison with the ∆Sq for the corresponding
chlorides 1 and 2, respectively. If the second double bond
takes part in solvolysis of 3, the largest contribution in
decreasing the value of ∆Sq compared with 1 is caused
by the loss of three internal rotations around the three
single C-C bonds located between the two double bonds
in the side chain of 3. The extended π-participation
mechanism fits excellently with the values of ∆Sq, since
it is known that the loss of one internal rotation in the
1
1.36 g (38%) of the pure product. IR 3370 cm-1 (b, O-H); H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.22 (s, 6H), 1.54-1.62 (m, 6H), 2.03-2.09 (m,
4H), 5.25-5.27 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.76, 15.57, 29.45,
34.3, 41.81, 70.93, 118.28, 135.94.
1,1,1-d 3-2,2,2-d 3-Meth yl-5-m eth yl-5(E)-h ep ten -2-ol. The
procedure is the same as described above. From Mg (0.17 g, 7
mmol), iodomethane-d3 (1 g, 7 mmol), and ethyl 4-methyl-4(E)-
hexenoate (ester 5) (0.55 g, 3.5 mmol), 0.24 g (46%) of product
was obtained. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.40-1.73 (m, 6H), 2.03-
2.09 (m, 4H), 5.20-5.26 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.05,
15.42, 34.18, 34.43, 41.65, 70.54, 118.25, 136.04.
2,5,9-Tr im et h yl-5(E),9(E)-u n d eca d ien -2-ol. The Grig-
nard reagent obtained from Mg (2.0 g, 82.3 mmol) and
iodomethane (6.0 g, 42 mmol) in ether (15 mL) was cooled to
0 °C, and ethyl 4,8-dimethyl-4(E),8(E)-decadienoate (ester 6)
(2.4 g, 10.7 mmol) in ether (20 mL) was added dropwise. The
reaction mixture was heated under reflux (1-2 h). The
Grignard complex was hydrolyzed with saturated aqueous
NH4Cl, and the product was extracted with ether. The
combined ether layers were dried over Na2SO4, the solvent was
evaporated, and the crude product was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (petroleum ether/dichloromethane
3:1 followed by petroleum ether/dichloromethane 1:1). The
transition state decreases ∆Sq by 15-20 J mol-1 K-1 1c,22
.
(21) Brunelle, P.; Sorensen, T. S.; Teaschler, C. J . Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 7294-7302.
(22) Page, M. I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1973, 295-323.