RSC Advances
Paper
leads to the formation of the cyclic carbonate and regeneration determined using NMR analysis with 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
of the catalyst. Notably, the hydroxy group in Al(koj)3 may also as the internal standard. The products were puried using
play a role in boosting the catalytic activity through possible column chromatography with ethyl acetate–petroleum ether as
hydrogen bonding interactions with the epoxide.
the eluent. The precipitated catalyst was washed with diethyl
ether ve times and dried using a pressure blowing concen-
trator ready to be used directly for the next reaction.
Conclusions
In summary, oxo-coordinated Al(koj)3 was developed as an
efficient catalyst for the synthesis of carbonates from epoxides
with CO2 under mild conditions without any solvent. A series of
terminal epoxides were converted to the corresponding
carbonates in yields of up to 99%. Moreover, this developed
catalyst system can be reused at least three times with no
signicant decrease in the propylene carbonate yield. This
developed catalyst system shows great potential for industrial-
ization due to the fact that it is easily prepared, inexpensive, has
stable catalytic activity and requires reaction conditions that are
easily realized.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
We thank Shaanxi University of Science and Technology for the
nancial support of this research (2016GBJ-20).
References
1 Mauna Loa Observatory (Hawaii), Scripps Institution of
programs/keelingcurve/, Accessed 23 Dec 2017.
2 M. Y. He, Y. H. Sun and B. X. Han, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2013, 52, 2.
3 (a) K. Sekine and T. Yamada, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 4524;
(b) C. Chauvier and T. Cantat, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 2107.
4 (a) T. Sakakura, J.-C. Choi and H. Yasuda, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 2365; (b) I. Omae, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2012, 256, 1384; (c)
Y. N. Li, R. Ma, L. N. He and Z. F. Diao, Catal. Sci. Technol.,
2014, 4, 1498; (d) B. Yu and L. N. He, ChemSusChem, 2015,
Experimental
General information
TBAI and epoxides were purchased from Alfa Aesar, Aladdin,
and J&K Chemical and were used without further treatment.
Kojic acid, Zn(OAc)2, Mn(OAc)2$2H2O, Fe(NO3)3$9H2O, and
Al(NO3)3 were from Energy Chemical. CO2 with a purity of
99.99% was commercially available. The products were char-
acterized in CDCl3 using a Varian Bruker 400 spectrometer.
´
´
8, 52; (e) F. Julia-Hernandez, T. Moragas, J. Cornella and
R. Martin, Nature, 2017, 545, 84; (f) Y. Y. Gui, W. J. Zhou,
J. H. Ye and D. G. Yu, ChemSusChem, 2017, 10, 1337.
5 (a) M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto and A. Angelini, Chem. Rev.,
2014, 114, 1709; (b) M. Aresta, Carbon Dioxide as Chemical
Feedstock, Wiley-VCH, 2010.
Synthesis and characterization of the kojic acid metal
complexes13
Zn(koj)2. IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 1622, 1568 (C]O); 1517 (C]
C); 1277, 1219 (C–O). Elemental analysis: [calcd for
C
12H10O8Zn$1/2H2O], calc.: C, 41.47; H, 2.90. Found: C, 41.2; H,
2.98.
Al(koj)3. IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 1613, 1578 (C]O); 1527 (C]C);
6 (a) M. Alves, B. Grignard, R. Mereau, C. Jerome, T. Tassaing
and C. Detrembleur, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 2651; (b)
H. Buttner, L. Longwitz, J. Steinbauer, C. Wulf and
1307, 1249 (C–O). Elemental analysis: [calcd for C18H15O10Al],
calc.: C, 48.01; H, 3.36. Found: C, 48.09; H, 3.30.
¨
T. Werner, Top. Curr. Chem., 2017, 375, 50.
Mn(koj)2. IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 3449 (O–H); 1613, 1576 (C]
O); 1528 (C]C); 1292, 1246 (C–O). Elemental analysis: [calcd for
¨
¨
¨
7 (a) B. Schaffner, F. Schaffner, S. P. Verevkin and A. Borner,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4554; (b) B. Yu, Z. F. Diao,
C. X. Guo, C. L. Zhong, L. N. He, Y. N. Zhao, Q. W. Song,
A. H. Liu and J. Q. Wang, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 2401.
8 (a) J. Steinbauer, A. Spannenberg and T. Werner, Green
Chem., 2017, 19, 3769; (b) S. Yue, P. P. Wang, X. J. Hao and
S. L. Zang, J. CO2 Util., 2017, 21, 238; (c) Q. N. Zhao,
Q. W. Song, P. Liu, Q. X. Zhang, J. H. Gao and K. Zhang,
Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 187; (d) S. Kaneko and
S. Shirakawa, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 2836; (e)
C. Maeda, J. Shimonishi, R. Miyazaki, J. Hasegawa and
T. Ema, Chem.–Eur. J., 2016, 22, 6556; (f) S. He, F. Wang,
W. L. Tong, S. M. Yiu and M. C. W. Chan, Chem. Commun.,
2016, 52, 1017; (g) H. Zhou, G. X. Wang, W. Z. Zhang and
X. B. Lu, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6773; (h) M. North,
S. C. Z. Quek, N. E. Pridmore, A. C. Whitwood and X. Wu,
ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 3398; (i) S. Sopena, G. Fiorani,
C. Martin and A. W. Kleij, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 3248; (j)
C
12H10O8Mn], calc.: C, 42.75; H, 2.99. Found: C, 42.48; H, 3.05.
Fe(koj)3. IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 3331 (O–H); 1610, 1561 (C]O);
1513 (C]C); 1276, 1249 (C–O). Elemental analysis:
[C18H15O10Fe$1/2H2O], calc.: C, 45.12; H, 3.16. Found: C, 45.19;
H, 3.12.
General procedure for the cycloaddition reaction of epoxides
with CO2
A mixture of the epoxide (5 mmol), metal catalyst, and TBAI was
placed into a glass tube, and then the tube was placed into
a 25 ml stainless steel autoclave. The reactor was charged with
CO2 to the desired pressure. Then, the autoclave was placed into
an oil-bath and heated. Aer the reaction, the reactor was
cooled in an ice-water bath, and the CO2 was carefully vented.
Diethyl ether was added to extract the carbonate products and
unreacted epoxide. The yield of cyclic carbonate was
11148 | RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 11145–11149
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018