2
Tetrahedron
1. Further support for the proposed structure was derived from
small equatorial – equatorial and axial - equatorial couplings
3
3
3
3
like: J2-H//3-H = 4.7, J2-H/3-H = 2.5, J2-H/3-H = 2.5, J3-H/4-H
=
2.5, 3J3-H/4-H = 4.0, 3J3-H/4-H = 4.0 and 3J4-H/5-H = 4.0 Hz. Finally
the characteristic NOE correlations, 1-H/2-H, 1-H/4-H, 2-
H/4-H, 3-H/5-H, provide emphatic support for the structure,
with the six-membered ring taking 5CC2C chair conformations.
3
The coupling constant J6-H/7-H = 15.6 Hz and NOE
Scheme 2. Selective formation of 2,3-disubstituted
tetrahydropyran (4a)
correlations, 4-H/6-H and 5-H/7-H, imply trans double bond
between 6-H and 7-H protons. The energy minimized
structure adequately supports the proposed structure of 4aꞌ
(Figure 2).
The effect of other acid catalysts such as BF3.OEt2 and
TMSOTf was studied for this conversion (entries b, c, Table
1). Though, the reaction proceeded at 0 C in the presence of
1 equiv of BF3.OEt2, the product 4a was obtained relatively in
lower yield than HBF4.OEt2 (entry b, Table 1). To our
surprise, TMSOTf also afforded the product 4a comparatively
in lower yield than HBF4.OEt2 (entry c, Table 1). The
reaction was also carried out using different amounts of the
reagent ranging from
a
catalytic (10 mol%) to
stoichiometric. However, the best conversions were
achieved using a stoichiometric amount of Lewis acid. We
further examined the effect of solvent for this reaction (entries
d-g, Table 1). However, the reaction was sluggish either in
THF or CH3CN affording the desired product 4a in trace
amount. To our delight, DCM gave the best results (entries a-
c, Table 1).
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions
Figure 2. Energy minimized structure and characteristic
NOEs of 4aꞌ
Encouraged by these initial findings, we extended this method
to a diverse range of aldehydes and the results are
summarized in Table 2. Interestingly, aryl aldehydes such as
4-chloro-, 4-bromo-, 4-fluoro-, 4-nitro-, 3,4-dimethoxy-, 4-
isopropyl-,
3,5-dimethyl-,
4-methoxy-,
4-cyano-
benzaldehydes participated well in this transformation (Table
2). This method was also successful with aliphatic aldehydes
such as cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde, n-hexanal, and
isobutyraldehyde under similar conditions. Acid sensitive α,β-
unsaturated aldehyde (cinnamaldehyde) was also compatible
under the reaction conditions. In all cases, the reactions
proceeded well at ambient temperature with high selectivity.
Only a single diastereomer was obtained in each reaction, the
1
structure of which was established by H and 13C NMR and
To confirm the terminal hydroxyl group, 4a was converted
into its acetate derivative 4aꞌ using acetic anhydride and
DMAP in dichloromethane. The structure and relative
stereochemistry of 4aꞌ were established by 1D and 2D NMR
experiments (Supporting information). The structures of 4aꞌ
were derived by extensive NMR experiments including 2-D
Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY) and
Double Quantum Filtered Correlation Spectroscopy
(DQFCOSY), Hetero-nuclear Single Quantum Correlations
(HSQC) and Hetero-nuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
(HMBC) experiments. The distinctive doublet at 3.94 ppm in
4aꞌ due to 1-H was used to initiate the assignments with the
help of DQF-COSY and NOESY experiments. From the one
mass spectrometry. This method is highly diastereoselective
affording high yields of products in a short reaction time
(Table 2).
1
dimensional H NMR experiments, large coupling constants
3
like : 3J1-H/5-H = 10.0, 3J2-H/3-H = 13.5, 3J3-H/4-H = 12.0, J4-H/5-
= 13.0 Hz imply the di-axial disposition of the participating
H
protons, which are consistent with the structure having six-
membered ring in chair conformation as shown in the Figure