153120-3
Qian et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 153120 ͑2007͒
hancement from the rough ligament surfaces is analogous to
that of the ultrafine nanoporous gold with smooth ligament
surfaces ͑Fig. 3͒. Thus, our observations of the SERS en-
hancements of nanoporous gold confirm that the high SERS
enhancements result from smaller microstructure features,
either smaller pore sizes or the rough gold ligament surfaces,
which are believed to promote electromagnetic filed en-
adsorption.
Because the formation and coarsening of nanoporous
gold are controlled by surface diffusion, the smaller pore
sizes formed by a short dealloying time at low temperatures
generally contain more or less residual silver. It is known
FIG. 3. ͑Color online͒ SERS spectra of nanoporous gold with different
ligament surface roughness for 10− mol/l R6G aqueous solution. The spec-
8
that the SERS effect of silver exceeds that of gold. Thus,
tra collected from
comparison.
5 and 700 nm nanoporous gold are plotted for
the stronger Raman scattering from the ultrafine nanoporous
gold may also include the extra contribution from the re-
sidual silver. However, the fact that the annealed nanoporous
gold ͑without detectable residual silver͒ containing a high
density of surface irregularities exhibits the analogous en-
hancement as the ultrafine nanoporous gold indicates that the
ultrafine structures, both small pore sizes and fine surface
pimple-type irregularities, play the major role in the strong
SERS enhancement of the nanoporous gold.
similar to the observations of Kucheyev et al. However, care-
ful microstructure characterization reveals that the anoma-
lous enhancements from the samples with large pore sizes
are associated with the rough surfaces of gold ligaments.
Figure 3 illustrates the representative SERS spectra of
−
8
10
mol/l R6G solution from the annealed nanoporous gold
and 1͑g͒. The Raman intensity of the porous sample with a
smooth gold surface is almost 15 times weaker than that of
Research was sponsored by the Grant-in-Aid for Explor-
atory Research, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology ͑MEXT͒, Japan, and by Mitsubishi
Science Foundation.
500 nm nonporous gold with a large number of surface ir-
regularities. Apparently, this huge difference in the SERS
enhancements cannot be attributed to the minor discrepancy
in pore sizes, and most likely results from the difference in
the gold surface roughness. Scanning electron microscopy
1
M. Moskovits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 783 ͑1985͒.
2
A. Campion and P. Kambhampati, Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 241 ͑1998͒.
3
S. Link and M. A. El-sayed, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19, 409 ͑2000͒.
͑SEM͒ characterization reveals that the diameter of the
4
Y. C. Liu, C. C. Yu, and S. F. Sheu, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 3546 ͑2006͒.
pimples on the rough surfaces is of ϳ5–20 nm. Interest-
ingly, the SERS enhancement from the regions with a high
density of surface pimple is comparable with that from the
ultrafine nanoporous gold that possesses an equivalent size in
the nanopore diameter as that of the surface irregularities.
To further investigate the optimized SERS enhancements
of nanoporous gold, in addition to R6G CV, 10 B in metha-
nol was also used as the test molecules. Figure 2͑b͒ repre-
5
P. Hildebrandt and M. Stockburger, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 5935 ͑1984͒.
6
U. Kreibig and L. Genzel, Surf. Sci. 156, 678 ͑1985͒.
7
S. M. Nie and S. R. Emery, Science 275, 1102 ͑1997͒.
8
K. Kneipp, Y. Wang, H. Kneipp, L. T. Perelman, I. Itzkan, R. R. Dasari,
and M. S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667 ͑1997͒.
H. Xu, E. J. Bjerneld, M. Kall, and L. Borjesson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83,
9
104
357 ͑1999͒.
X. Y. Zhang, A. V. Whitney, J. Zhao, and R. P. Van Duyne, J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol. 6, 1 ͑2006͒.
−
5
11
sents SERS spectra of 10 mol/l CV on nanoporous gold
with various pore sizes. Characteristic CV SERS bands can
be identified and their intensities gradually increase with the
reduction of nanopore sizes. Quantitative intensity measure-
P. M. Tessier, O. D. Velev, A. T. Kalambur, J. F. Rabolt, A. M. Lenhoff,
and E. W. Kaler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9554 ͑2000͒.
L. H. Lu, R. Capek, A. Kornowski, N. Gaponik, and A. Eychmuller,
Angew. Chem. 117, 6151 ͑2005͒.
1
2
13
Y. Ding, A. Mathur, M. W. Chen, and J. Erlebacher, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 44, 4002 ͑2005͒.
−
1
ments of Raman bands at 1175 cm ͓Fig. 2͑c͔͒ show the
same size effect as that of R6G, i.e., smaller pore sizes have
stronger SERS enhancements. The anomalous enhancement
from coarsened nanopores with an ϳ350 nm pore size but a
gold system, as shown in Figs. 2͑b͒ and 2͑c͒. This anomalous
enhancement was found to quickly degrade with the smooth-
ening of gold ligament surfaces.
1
1
4
Y. Ding, Y. J. Kim, and J. Erlebacher, Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 16,
1
897 ͑2004͒.
5
T. Fujita, L. H. Qian, K. Inoke, J. Erlebacher, and M. W. Chen, Phys. Rev.
Lett. ͑in press͒.
16
K. Kneipp, A. S. Haka, H. Kneipp, K. Badizadegan, N. Yoshizawa, C.
Boone, K. E. Shafer-peltier, J. T. Motz, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld,
Appl. Spectrosc. 56, 150 ͑2002͒.
1
1
7
8
M. C. Dixon, Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 2005.
S. O. Kucheyev, J. R. Hayes, J. Biener, T. Huser, C. E. Talley, and A. V.
Hamza, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 53102 ͑2006͒.
SERS enhancements of nanoporous gold for both R6G
and CV molecules prove that ultrafine nanopores possess the
strongest SERS enhancement. Although high enhancements
can be obtained in the annealed samples with a large pore
size of ϳ350 nm, similar to the observations of Kucheyev
et al., this anomalous enhancement originates from the ul-
trafine pimple-type irregularities on the rough gold surfaces.
SEM characterization reveals that the diameter of the surface
irregularities is of ϳ5–20 nm. Interestingly, the SERS en-
19
L. H. Qian, X. Q. Yan, T. Fujita, and M. W. Chen ͑unpublished͒.
X. Q. Yan, W. J. Li, T. Goto, and M. W. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88,
131905 ͑2006͒.
2
0
2
2
2
1
2
3
J. Erlebacher, ͑private communication͒.
J. Gersten and A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 3023 ͑1980͒.
T. Jensen, L. Kelly, A. Lazarides, and G. C. Schatz, J. Cluster Sci. 10, 295
4͑
1999͒.
2
K. Kneipp, M. Moskovits, and H. Kneipp, Surface-Enhanced Raman Scat-
tering: Physics and Applications ͑Springer, Berlin, 2006͒, 103, p. 261
Downloaded 03 Apr 2013 to 131.211.208.19. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions