ARTICLE IN PRESS
P. Born et al. / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 71 (2010) 95–99
99
fluid–fluid transition disappear. Thus the shape of the particle
potential determines whether the phase separation leads to an
ordered solid phase or an unordered liquid phase of the particles.
Treating the suspension as
a van der Waals-gas quite
accurately accounts for the agglomeration behavior, but it does
not fully explain the temperature-dependence of the ordering. To
describe this behavior, it may be necessary to take into account
parameters such as particle kinetic energy or particle mobility.
Consequently it may be possible to assign regions in a phase
diagram, where particles form ordered structures and to make
predictions for other particle systems.
5. Conclusions
Agglomeration of gold nanoparticles has been studied as a
function of the temperature. Phase behavior similar to that
of a van der Waals-gas was observed, explaining the general
conditions which are necessary for the formation of ordered
particle superstructures. To obtain a well-aligned close-packed
mesoscopic material, the binodal decomposition line of the source
suspension must be determined. The temperature must then be
adjusted to start nucleation and growth but still keeps the
suspension from spinodal decomposition.
Fig. 7. Schematic phase diagram of
a hard sphere system interacting via a
Lennard–Jones potential (adapted from [21]).
formed by spinodal decomposition. Ordering only occurs for
particle assembly at high temperatures, despite of the slow
assembly process at low temperatures.
However, the process of structure formation is not yet fully
understood and can probably not be described by a temperature–
concentration phase diagram. Although quantative predictions of
the phase behavior for different systems cannot yet be made, the
qualitative result should be transferrable to similar colloids with
strong van der Waals interaction, e.g. metals such as aluminum or
iron and other materials with interesting energetic applications.
According to the model of Edwards and Dolan [20], the
interparticle potential of two sterically stabilized particles can
be described by the formula
1
6 r6
V ¼ ꢀ 9
NkbT
2
ꢀð3d =2lLÞ
A
Ham
þ
2e
;
d6
A
where r is the particle radius, d the surface separation of the
particles, AHam the Hamaker-coefficient, N the number of inter-
b
acting polymers, A the interacting surface, k T the thermal energy,
l the linker length, and L the length of the ligand.
References
This interaction potential consists of an attractive van der
Waals-potential and a steep repulsive potential that is due to the
steric interaction of the ligand shells of the particles. It resembles
the Lennard–Jones potential; an analogy that we exploit for the
interpretation of our results. Fig. 7 shows a schematic phase
diagram for spheres interacting via a Lennard–Jones potential
[1] C.B. Murray, C.R. Kagan, M.G. Bawendi, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30 (2000)
510–545.
[
[
2] Y. Xia, B. Gates, Y. Yin, Y. Lu, Adv. Mater. 12 (2000) 693–713.
3] S.C. Glotzer, M.J. Solomon, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 557–562.
[4] S.H. Park, Y. Xia, Langmuir 15 (1999) 266–273.
[5] L. Malaquin, T. Kraus, H. Schmid, E. Delamarche, H. Wolf, Langmuir 23 (2007)
11513–11521.
[
21]. Characteristic features are the Kirkwood–Alder transition
[
[
6] J. Tien, A. Terfort, G. Whitesides, Langmuir 13 (1997) 5349–5355.
7] M. Giersig, P. Mulvaney, Langmuir 9 (1993) 3408–3413.
from fluid to solid at 50% of the volume occupied by the spheres,
the existence of a critical temperature below which a fluid–fluid
phase transition from gas to liquid occurs, and the separation of
the phases either by binodal or spinodal decomposition. Our
suspensions had a low nanoparticle volume fraction occupied by
gold particles, close to 0.05%, far left of the critical temperature in
the phase diagram.
[8] E.V. Shevchenko, D.V. Talapin, C.B. Murray, S. O’Brien, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128
2006) 3620–3637.
9] E.V. Shevchenko, D.V. Talapin, N.A. Kotov, S. O’Brien, C. Murray, Nature 439
2006) 55–59.
[10] T. Still, W. Cheng, M. Retsch, U. Jonas, G. FytasJ. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20
2008) 1–9.
(
[
(
(
[
11] M.E. Leunissen, C.G. Christova, A.-P. Hynninen, C.P. Royall, A.I. Campbell, A.
Imhof, M. Dijkstra, R. van Roij, A. van Blaaderen, Nature 437 (2005) 235–240.
Interpreting the gold particles in the suspension as molecules
of a van der Waals-gas can qualitatively explain our observations.
Cooling the suspension will lead to a metastable regime, where a
phase separation occurs by nucleation and growth (i.e. by binodal
decomposition). Cooling further leads to the unstable regime,
where spinodal decomposition takes place and results in the
observed large particle networks. Increasing the concentration
shifts the decompositions to higher transition temperatures.
Quantitative predictions require knowledge of the exact shape
of the interparticle potential. There has been extensive study to
theoretically determine the phase diagram for particles interact-
ing via different potentials (a review is given in [22]). Importantly,
Zaccarelli et al. [23] have shown that with decreasing range of the
attractive part of the potential, the critical temperature and the
[12] Y. Huang, G.A. Risha, V. Yang, R.A. Yetter, Combust. Flame 156 (2009) 5–13.
[
[
13] A.P. Gast, W.B. Russel, Phys. Today 51 (1998) 24–30.
14] A.O. Lundgren, F. Bj o¨ refors, L.G.M. Olofsson, H. Elwing, Nano Lett. 8 (2008)
3989–3992.
[15] M.Y. Lin, H.M. Lindsay, D.A. Weitz, R.C. Ball, R. Klein, P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. A 41
(1990) 2005–2020.
[16] B.A. Korgel, S. Fullam, S. Connolly, D. Fitzmaurice, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998)
8379–8388.
[17] M.G. Constantinides, H.M. Jaeger, X. Li, J. Wang, X.-M. Lin, Z. Kristallogr. 222
(2007) 595–600.
[
18] S.E. Phan, W.B. Russel, J. Zhu, P.M. Chaikin, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998) 9789–
795.
19] N. Zheng, J. Fan, G.D. Stucky, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 6550–6551.
9
[
[20] A. Dolan, S. Edwards, Proc. R. Soc. A 337 (1974) 509–516.
[
[
[
21] R.A.L. Jones, in: Soft Condensed Matter, Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 67.
22] G. Malescio, J. Phys., Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 1–23.
23] E. Zaccarelli, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, G. Foffi, G. McCullagh, A. Lawlor,
K. Dawson, Phys. A 314 (2002) 539–547.