G Model
CCLET-2929; No. of Pages 5
K. Fang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
ESI-MS: Calcd. for C19H18ClN4O [M+H]+: m/z 353.83; found:
353.49.
Top2a-mediated supercoiled pBR322 relaxation assay: Relaxa-
tion assays were performed using Topoisomerase II Drug Screening
Kits (TopoGEN, Inc.) [8]. The reaction buffer contained 50 mmol/L
Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L
Synthesis of 2-bromoacetamidoevodiamine (10): To a stirring
solution of 9a (0.1 g, 0.3 mmol) and Et3N (0.04 mL, 0.3 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (20 mL), 2-bromoacetyl bromide (0.04 mL, 0.47 mmol) was
added and stirred for 1 h at 0 8C. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column
chromatography (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:1, v/v) to afford 10 (0.11 g,
dithiothreitol, 30
ATP, 0.25 g pBR322 plasmid DNA, and 0.75 unit of Top2
(TopoGEN, Inc.) in a total volume of 20 L. After incubation at 37 8C
for 30 min, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 2
mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), 2 mmol/L
m
a
m
m
L
yield 84%) as yellow solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
2.69 (s,
10Â gel loading buffer (0.25% bromophenol blue, 50% glycerol).
The reaction products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel at 8 V/cm
for 1 h with TAE (Tris–acetate–EDTA) as the running buffer. Gels
3H), 2.85 (m, 2H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 4.01 (s, 2H), 4.62 (m, 1H), 6.07 (s,
1H), 7.00 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.08–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.35 (d, 1H,
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.73 (dd, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz, 2.4 Hz),
8.03 (d, 1H, J = 2.7 Hz), 10.41 (s, 1H), 11.16 (s, 1H). ESI-MS: Calcd.
for C21H19BrN4O2 [M+H]+: m/z 439.07; found: 439.75.
were stained with ethidium bromide (0.5
mg/mL) for 60 min. The
DNA band was visualized over UV light and photographed with Gel
Doc Ez imager software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd.).
Synthesis of 2-mercaptoacetamidoevodiamine (11): A solu-
tion of 10 (0.05 g, 0.11 mmol) and Na2SÁ9H2O (0.27 g, 1.1 mmol) in
DMF (5 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent
was removed in vacuo and the residue was diluted with water and
filtered from insolubles. The filtrate was acidified to pH 1.2 with
3 mol/L HCl. The precipitate was collected and purified by silica
gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2–MeOH, gradient 100:1–
100:3) to give compound 11 (0.03 g, yield 70%) as a yellow solid.
In vitro cytotoxicity assay: Cells were seeded in 96-well
microtiter plates at a density of 5 Â 103/well and treated in
triplicate with gradient concentrations of compounds in
a
humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 8C for 72 h. 20
mL of
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bro-
mide) solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and the plate
was incubated for an additional 4 h. The formazan was dissolved in
100
mL of DMSO. The absorbance (OD) was read on a WellscanMK-
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
1.30 (s, 1 H), 2.66 (s, 3H), 2.86
2 microplate reader (Labsystems) at 570 nm. The concentration
causing 50% inhibition of cell growth (IC50) was determined by the
Logit method [9,10]. All experiments were performed three times.
(m, 2H), 3.20 (m, 1H), 3.48 (s, 2H), 4.64 (m, 1H), 6.06 (s, 1H), 7.01
(t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.10–7.15 (m, 2H), 7.36 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.50
(d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 8.07 (s, 1H), 10.19 (s, 1H),
11.19 (s, 1H). ESI-MS: Calcd. for C21H20N4O2S [M + H]+: m/z
393.14; found: 393.84.
2.3. Molecular docking
Synthesis of 3-(2-(piperazin-1-yl)pyridin-4-yl)evodiamine
(12): Under an nitrogen atomosphere, 8c (0.1 g, 0.23 mmol), 2-
(1-piperazinyl)pyridine-4-boronic acid pinacol ester (0.1 g,
0.35 mmol) and tetrakistriphenylphosphine palladium (40 mg)
were dissolved in DMF (5 mL). An aqueous sodium carbonate
solution (2 mol/L, 1 mL) was added and the mixture was heated
under reflux for 3.5 h. After cooled to room temperature, the
reaction mixture was diluted with water (50 mL) and then
extracted with EtOAc (3 Â 50 mL). The combined organic layers
were washed with saturated sodium chloride solution (3 Â 50 mL),
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chroma-
tography (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:1, v/v) to givecompound 12 (0.056 g,
In silico docking was performed using GOLD 5.1 [11] on a Linux
PC as described before [8]. The X-ray crystallographic structures of
CPT-DNA-Top1 ternary complex (PDB code: 1T8I [12]) and ATPase
domain of humanTop2a(PDBcode:1ZXM[13]) were obtained from
the Protein Data Bank. They were prepared for molecular docking
analysisinDiscoveryStudio3.0[14]byremovingtheligandfromthe
binding pocket, merging nonpolar hydrogens, adding polar hydro-
gens, and rendering Gasteiger charges to each atom.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. In vitro antitumor activity
yield 51%) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 2.15
The growth inhibitory activities of the target compounds toward
human cancer cell lines A549 (lung cancer), MDA-MB-435 (breast
cancer), and HCT116 (colon cancer) were determined using MTT
assay. Evodiamine was used as the reference drug. When the 2-
(s, 3H), 2.82 (m, 1H), 3.01 (m, 1H), 3.16 (m, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.81
(s, 3H), 4.64 (m, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H), 6.85 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.92 (s, 1H),
6.99 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.05–7.11 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz),
7.44 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.85 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz, 2.1 Hz), 8.04 (d, 1H,
J = 2.1 Hz), 8.09 (d, 1H, J = 5.1 Hz), 10.99 (s, 1H). ESI-MS: Calcd.
for C28H28N6O [M+H]+: m/z 465.24; found: 465.84.
bromoacetamide group was attached on the position
evodiamine E-ring, compound 10 showed moderate in vitro
antitumor activity against MDA-MB-435 (IC50 = 22.69 mol/L),
A549 (IC50 = 153.97 mol/L) and HCT 116 (IC50 = 28 mol/L) cell
3 of
m
m
m
2.2. Biological assay
lines (Table 1). However, the loss of the antitumor activity was
observed for the corresponding thio-derivative 11. 2-Chloro-3-nitro
evodiamine (8b) also showed moderate antitumor activity against
all three of the tested cancer cell lines. When its nitro group was
reduced to the amino group, compound 9b showed significantly
Top1-mediated supercoiled pBR322 relaxation assay: Relaxa-
tion assays were carried out as previously described [7,8]. The
reaction buffer contained 35 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 72 mmol/L
KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 5 mmol/L spermi-
dine, 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.25
DNA, and 1 unit of Top1 (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian) in
a total volume of 20 L. After incubation at 37 8C for 15 min, the
reaction was stopped by the addition of 2
(0.9% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.05% bromophenol blue, and
50% glycerol). Then, the DNA samples were subjected to
electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gel in TAE (Tris–acetate–EDTA)
at 8 V/cm for 1 h. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide
mg pBR322 plasmid
Table 1
In vitro antitumor activity of evodiamine derivatives (IC50, mmol/L).
m
Compounds
Structure
IC50 (mmol/L)
m
L of 10Â loading buffer
MDA-MB-435
A549
204.15
HCT116
8b
31.37
1.35
35.97
75.19
28.00
>250
9b
>250
153.97
>250
6.80
100.00
10
22.69
>250
2.78
11
(0.5
mg/mL) for 60 min. The DNA band was visualized over UV light
12
5.94
and photographed with Gel Doc Ez imager software (Bio-Rad
Laboratories Ltd.).
Evodiamine
20.20
100.00
Please cite this article in press as: K. Fang, et al., Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of E-ring modified evodiamine derivatives as