L. Kathawate et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1048 (2013) 223–229
225
Table 1
3. Result and discussion
Crystal structure data and structure refinement for 1.
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
Wavelength
Crystal system
Space group
C22H18O8Zn
475.73
296(2) K
0.71073 Å
Monoclinic
P21/n
a = 5.015(1) Å, a = 90°
b = 12.447(3) Å, b = 98.280(3)°
c = 15.785(4) Å,
975.1(2) Å3
2
Coordination of hydroxy naphthoquinone ligands to metal ions
will take place by deprotonation of hydroxyl group and it needs
basic conditions, this can be achieved by addition of pyridine
[29], sodium acetate [30], ammonia [31], 4,40-bipyridine [32],
triethylamine [33], etc. Based on the synthetic conditions the coor-
dination of hydroxynaphthoquinone ligands to metal ions may be
either ‘cis, cis’ or ‘trans, trans’ for example, the coordination of
2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (lawsone) to Zn2+ is ‘cis, cis’ when
1 mmol of triethylamine is used while, ‘trans, trans’ coordination
is achieved with 2 mmol of triethylamine [29]. Coordination of
hydroxynaphthoquinone with metal ions is always ‘anti, anti’,
when acetate ions are used in reaction mixture [30,12b]. Reaction
of zinc acetate with phthiocol at room temperature forms red
precipitate of 1: [Zn(phthiocol)2(H2O)2].
Various analytical tools are used to determine the oxidation
states of redox active ligands viz. frequency of mC@O by FT-IR spec-
troscopy [1b,e] and CAO bond length by single crystal X-ray dif-
fraction studies, etc., however sometimes they may lead to
misleading results, for antiferromagnetic interaction between the
semiquinone radicals [34]. Oxidation states of hydroxy naphtho-
quinone ligands could also be determined by thermogravimetric
analysis [19]. To reveal the oxidation states of phthiocol ligands
in 1 characterization is performed by FT-IR, thermogravimetric
analysis, single crystal X-ray diffraction and electrochemical stud-
ies. The molecular and electronic structures of the one- and two-
electron reduced forms are evaluated by DFT studies.
Unit cell dimensions
c = 90°
Volume
Z
q
1.620 g/cc
1.310 mmꢃ1
488
Absorption coefficient
F(000)
Crystal size
Theta range for data collection 2.09–24.99°
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to theta = 24.99° 99.9%
Absorption correction
0.17 ꢂ 0.05 ꢂ 0.02 mm3
ꢃ5 <= h <= 5, ꢃ14 <= k <= 14, ꢃ18 <= l <= 12
4803
1698 [R(int) = 0.0335]
Semi-empirical from equivalents
Max. and min. transmission
Refinement method
0.9806 and 0.8052
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
1698/0/151
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit on F2
1.168
Final R indices [I > 2sigma(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest diff. peak and hole
R1 = 0.0510, wR2 = 0.1038
R1 = 0.0686, wR2 = 0.1092
0.508 and ꢃ0.249 eÅꢃ3
10 mL methanol and chilled on an ice bath. A solution of 0.2 g of
anhydrous Na2CO3 and 1 mL of 30% H2O2 in 5 mL of water was then
added and the reaction mixture maintained at 0 °C. Addition of
100 mL of chilled water led to the precipitation of 2-methyl-1,4-
naphthoquinoneoxide as colorless crystals which were collected
by filtration and dried in air. The solid was treated with 5 mL con-
centrated H2SO4 and allowed to stand for 10 min. The addition of
20 mL water afforded a yellow precipitate which was recrystallized
from methanol containing a few drops of concentrated H2SO4. The
crude product was column chromatographed using 5% methanol in
toluene.
3.1. Characterization of 1
The FT-IR spectra of phthiocol and complex 1 are overlaid in
Fig. 1. The peak at ꢄ3290 cmꢃ1 in the spectrum of 1 is characteris-
tic of coordinated water as opposed to water trapped in the KBr
matrix that manifests as
a considerably sharper peak at
3400 cmꢃ1 in the spectrum of phthiocol. The considerable width
of this peak obscures the mCAH stretches of the aromatic protons
>3000 cmꢃ1 in 1. These are clearly visible in the spectrum of free
phthiocol together with the corresponding vibrations of the
C(3)ACH3 substituent ꢄ2900 cmꢃ1
.
The mC@O vibration at
2.3.1.1. Characterization of phthiocol. Yellow solid, Yield: 0.84 g
(84%). FT-IR; (KBr, cmꢃ1): 3371 s, 1660 s, 1591 s, 1392 s, 1276
s, 1211 s, 833 s, 727 s, 684 s, 634 sh. 1H NMR; (DMSO-d6,
300 MHz): d 1.956 (s, 3H, Ar), 7.969 (d, J = 6.3, 2H, Ar), 7.821 (t,
J = 6.15, 2H, Ar), 7.778 (t, J = 6.3, 2H, Ar), 7.989 (d, J = 5.4, 2H,
Ar), d 10.900 (s, ArAOH). UV–vis; (methanol, kmax, nm): 287,
330, 388, 479. LC-MS (m/z): 188.
ꢄ1635 cmꢃ1 of phthiocol bound to Zn2+ in 1 is shift ꢄ25 cmꢃ1 to
lower energy than the free entity. The mC@C vibrations
(ꢄ1587 cmꢃ1) also shift to slightly lower energy upon complexa-
tion of phthiocol. A new band observed at ꢄ1550 cmꢃ1 is of delo-
calization of charge between mC@C and mC@O after coordination of
the free phthiocol ligand [34]. The p-naphthoquinone vibration in
1 is observed ꢄ1290 cmꢃ1, an increase of ꢄ10 cmꢃ1 compared to
phthiocol ligand (ꢄ1280 cmꢃ1). Similarly the mC(2)AO vibration is
shifted 21 cmꢃ1 to higher energy.
1H NMR spectrum of phthiocol show two singlet due to AOH
and C(3)ACH3, two doublets due to C(5)H and C(8)H, and two trip-
lets due to C(6)H and C(7)H (Fig. 2). The singlet peak due to AOH
disappears upon coordination of a Zn2+ ion forming 1. There is up-
field shift of 0.11–0.23 ppm observed for the benzenoid ring pro-
tons in 1 compared to free phthiocol.
2.3.2. Synthesis of 1
A solution of zinc acetate (0.22 g; 1.0 mmol) in 10 mL of anhy-
drous methanol was added drop-wise to phthiocol (0.38 g;
2.0 mmol) dissolved in 25 mL anhydrous methanol over 30 min.
with constant stirring. The precipitate of dark red 1 was collected
by filtration, washed with methanol, then diethyl ether and dried
under vacuum.
UV–vis spectra for phthiocol and 1 were recorded between 200
and 800 nm in methanol, with both exhibiting three bands
(Fig. S1). Two excitation in the UV region at 292 nm and 329 nm
2.3.2.1. Characterization of 1. Red solid, Yield: 0.33 g (70%). FT-IR;
(KBr; cmꢃ1): 3354 br, 1635 s, 1585 s, 1381 s, 1290 s, 1232 s, 844
s, 734 s, 682 s, 665 s. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): d 1.839 (s,
Ar), 7.508 (t, J = 7.8, 2H, Ar), 7.665 (t, J = 6.6, 2H, Ar), 7.758 (d,
for 1 are assigned as p ?
pꢅ transitions of quinonoid and benze-
noid rings, respectively. The latter shows a modest hyposochromic
shift in 1 compared with free phthiocol. The single peak in the vis-
ible region at 479 nm for phthiocol and shifted to 491 nm in 1 has
been previously described as the n ? pꢅ charge transfer (CT) tran-
sition [35]. There is a bathochromic shift observed to the band
ꢄ491 nm in 1 due to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT).
J = 6.6, 2H, Ar), 7.858 (t, J = 7.2, 2H, Ar). UV–vis; (methanol, kmax
,
nm): 292, 329, 491. Anal. Data Calc. for [C22H18O8Zn] (475.76 g):
C, 55.54; H, 3.81, Zn, 13.74%. Found: C, 54.95; H, 3.71, Zn, 12.77%.