in particular when an ortho-orienting metalation group is
present. In contrast, it has not yet been addressed to
unsymmetrical alicyclic 1,2-dihaloolefins, even though ex-
amples of generation of 1-lithio-2-bromocyclopentenes from
symmetrical dibromocyclopentenes, followed by alkylation,
are in the literature.7a,8
We focused our attention on the monolithiation of O-TBS-
protected 2-iodo-3-bromocyclopentenol 3,9 with the prospect
of achieving a faster halogen/metal exchange at C-2 than at
C-3 (Scheme 3). Our rationale was based on the higher
exchanged with complete regioselectivity. To complete our
test reactions, the bromocyclopentene 4a (Scheme 3, R )
H in formula 4) was subsequently exposed to t-BuLi (2.5
equiv) at -78 °C, followed by protonation (NH4Cl) of the
resulting anion, affording, uneventfully, the volatile debro-
minated cyclopentene 5a (Scheme 3, R ) R′ ) H in formula
5) in 72% yield.
Subsequently, with the aim to extend this new methodol-
ogy to the construction of mono- and disubstituted cyclo-
pentenes, we tested different C(sp2)- and C(sp3)-electrophiles
for quenching the vinyl anions produced from compound 3
(Scheme 3). Our results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Scheme 2
Table 1. Electrophilic Additions to 2-Monolithium Species
Generated Regioselectively from Cyclopentene 3*
strength of the C-Br bond than the C-I bond10 and the
higher reactivity of iodides than bromides in the exchange
reaction.11 Moreover, the combined electron-withdrawing
effects of the oxygen and the bromine atoms on vicinal
carbons were expected to stabilize a negative charge at C-2
better than at C-3.
To test our assumption, compound 3 was exposed to BuLi
(1.1 equiv) at -78 °C in THF, and after 10 min, the resulting
yellowish anion was quenched by the addition of saturated
aqueous NH4Cl at the same temperature. GC-MS analysis
of the reaction mixture revealed a complete conversion of 3
into one monobromo derivative, which was isolated in 88%
yield and assigned as structure 4a (Scheme 3, R ) H in
Scheme 3
* General procedure: (i) 1.6 M BuLi (1.1 equiv), THF, -78 °C, 12 min;
(ii) electrophile (1.2 equiv), from -78 °C to -30 °C over 4 h. a General
procedure, except that the reaction was quenched after 1 h at -78 °C
(warming to -30 °C was not necessary). b General procedure, except that
HMPA (6 equiv, CAUTION: toxic!) was added before adding the
electrophile. c General procedure, except that 0.25 M lithium 2-thienylcy-
anocuprate (1.1 equiv) in THF, -78 °C, 20 min, was added before adding
the electrophile. d Mixture of diastereomers.
formula 4) by NMR COSY and NOESY experiments.
This result demonstrated that, on exposure to BuLi,
dihalocyclopentenol 3 underwent a single and efficient
halogen-lithium permutation, the iodine atom at C-2 being
The expected mono- (4b-k) and dialkylated (5b-n)
products were obtained from compound 3 with complete
regioselectivity and in satisfactory overall yields. To recon-
firm the site selectivity of the first halogen-lithium ex-
change, compounds 5b-n were produced in two separate
steps, with isolation and structure determination of the
corresponding intermediates of general formula 4.
In principle, sequential replacement of halogens by elec-
trophiles could be achieved in a one-pot operation; however,
the overall efficiency was lower. Thus, treatment of 3 with
BuLi (1.1 equiv), followed by propanal, afforded 4c as a
lithium alkoxide, which, without isolation, was exposed to
t-BuLi (3.3 equiv), followed by acetaldehyde, to afford 5e
in 50% yield, as compared to 70% for the two-step procedure.
(7) (a) Schlosser, M. In Organometallics in Synthesis: A Manual;
Schlosser, M., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2002; pp 101-137. (b) Liu, Y.;
Gribble, G. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7135-7137.
(8) (a) Foubelo, F.; Yus, M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 459-490. (b)
Dastan, A.; Uzundumlu, E.; Balci, M.; Fabris, F.; De Lucchi, O. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 183-192. (c) Tranmer, G. K.; Yip, C.; Handerson, S.;
Jordan, R. W.; Tam, W. Can. J. Chem. 2000, 78, 527-535. (d) Paquette,
L. A.; Doyon, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6799-6800. (e) Gassman,
P. G.; Gennick, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6863-6864.
(9) Easily available in four steps from commercial 1,3-cyclopentanedione,
as depicted in Scheme 2.
(10) Vedeneyev, V. I.; Gurvich, L. V.; Kondrat’yev, V. N.; Medvedev,
V. A.; Fraukevich, Y. L. Bond Energies, Ionization Potentials and Electron
Affinities; E. Arnold: London, 1966.
(11) Gilman, H.; Langham, W.; Moore, F. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940,
62, 2327-2335.
2148
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 10, 2006