478
P.K. Sen et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 224 (2016) 472–479
nS
+
MB
S MB
n
The k
ence of surfactant (i.e., constant value of rate constant at higher surfac-
tant concentration but less than its CMC value) in the plot of k versus
log [SDS] (Fig. 6). The linear plots of log{(k − k ) / (k − k )} versus
log [S] (Fig. 7) with positive slope and intercept at three different tem-
peratures (298, 303 and 308 K) are shown in Fig. 7. The values of co-
m
was taken as the limiting or minimum rate constant in the pres-
K
S
Ψ
w
Ψ
Ψ
m
k
m
S MB
n
Product
S
operativity index (n) and K (the dissociation constant of the pre-mi-
celle, S MB) at three different temperatures have been evaluated from
n
k
w
the slopes and intercepts of these plots (Fig. 7) and are shown in Table 3.
The small values of n (1.45 to 1.76) are in agreement with earlier ob-
servations [14–16,30]. Such values are much less than the aggregation
number of the normal micelles. Moreover, these pre-micelles are aggre-
gates between the substrate molecule and a small number of surfactant
monomers while the normal micelles are aggregates among a large
MB
Product
Scheme 6. Reaction steps according to Piszkiewicz's model.
In the presence of surfactants, partitioning of the reactants often occur
between the bulk aqueous phase and the micellar pseudo-phase
which may either increase or decrease the local concentration of the re-
actants, thereby resulting in an enhancement or diminution of the reac-
tion rate [36]. A change in the reaction rate in the presence of
surfactants may sometimes be accounted for by a change in the dielec-
tric constant or the pH of the medium at the micellar surface [37,38].
This is to be noted that the present oxidation reaction was per-
formed at SDS concentrations (0.24–10) × 10 M, which is sufficiently
lower than its normal CMC. Hence the formation of micelles is not pos-
sible at this low concentration and so the inhibition of reaction rate is
definitely not due to the effect of micellar aggregates. Moreover, the in-
hibition effect of SDS monomers (in the pre-micellar region) on the re-
action rate cannot be explained as an effect of increase of ionic strength,
because the change in ionic strength is small and the effect is opposite to
that obtained by addition of halides. Therefore, one plausible explana-
tion may be that a few anionic SDS monomers (having negatively
charged head groups) bind with the positively charged methylene
blue species (both protonated and unprotonated forms) through elec-
trostatic as well as hydrophobic interactions in a co-operative manner
thus making the approach of the ascorbic acid molecule more difficult
number of surfactant monomers only. The dissociation constant (K
of the pre-micelle is very small (Table 3). The small values of K were
also reported in a number of investigations [14–16]. The small K
S
)
S
S
value indicates that the dissociation of the pre-micellar complex back
to its free components (Scheme 6) is negligible. It is quite plausible
that before the formation of pre-micelle, the reactant MB and the SDS
monomer are in hydrated forms. But in the pre-micellar assembly
they interact more strongly by means of electrostatic as well as hydro-
phobic interactions which are possibly stronger than the hydration in-
teractions of the individual molecules of MB and SDS. This may
−
4
account for the small value of K
value of K does not always reflect the stronger pre-micellar binding be-
tween the reactant and the surfactant monomer. Apart from the K
value, the extent of binding also depends on the co-operativity index
(n) and the SDS concentration (Scheme 6). The ratio of [S MB]/[MB]
S
. However, it must be noted that the
S
S
n
has been evaluated to be 154.8, 81.4 and 63.5 (Table 3) at the tempera-
tures of 298 K, 303 K and 308 K respectively. The ratio indicates that the
binding in the pre-micelle is reasonably strong and most of the MB mol-
ecules remain associated in the pre-micelle. The above results show that
the extent of association decreases with increase in temperature. This is
possibly due to the fact that both MB and SDS remain in hydrated forms
in the aqueous medium. When they move towards the formation of the
pre-micelles, water structures are destroyed with an absorption of ener-
gy (ΔH positive) and at the same time MB and SDS monomers unite to-
gether through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with a
(
Scheme 5). As a result the overall reaction rate rapidly decreases.
When almost all the oxidant species become bound to the SDS mono-
mers, the rate reaches a limiting low value.
4
.1. Piszkiewicz's model
There are reports of different models [16,30,39] which can explain
Table 3
the inhibition of reaction rates in presence of surfactant in the pre-mi-
cellar region. In our present investigation, the rate constant values at dif-
ferent SDS concentrations at a constant temperature have been
analyzed using earlier reported Piszkiewicz's model [30] of pre-micellar
catalyzed reactions. In this model, a small number (n) of SDS monomers
−
3
Influence of surfactant concentration on the reaction rate. [AA] = 2.0 × 10 M, [MB] =
.0 × 10 M and [H+] = 0.1 M.
−5
1
Temperature 104 [SDS] 104
k
)
Cooperativity
index (n)
108
Ψ
−
1
(K)
(M)
0.24
(s
K
S
n
[S MB]/[MB]
298
303
308
20.4
16.6
7.85
1.65
1.52
2.16
1.76
1.5
25.1
21.5
13.5
4.59
5.15
3.5
2.82
2.35
28.3
23.3
11.2
4.94
5.79
4.30
3.24
2.53
1.76
1.71
1.45
3.39 154.8
9.11 81.4
70.3 63.5
(
(
S) aggregates or associates with the reactant (MB) to form pre-micelles
MB). These pre-micellar aggregates react at a different rate along
0
0
2
.56
.96
.0
S
n
with the normal reaction occurring in the aqueous phase (Scheme 6).
Here, K is the dissociation constant of the pre-micelle (S MB) [30]
back to its free components, k is the rate constant in the aqueous
phase and k is the limiting value of the rate constant in the presence
of SDS. According to the Scheme 6, the rate law expressing the pseu-
S
n
4.0
6
8
1
.0
.0
0.0
w
m
0.24
0.56
0.96
ψ
do-first order rate constant (k ) as a function of SDS concentration be-
comes,
2.0
n
4.0
6.0
km½Sꢀ þ kwKS
kψ ¼
ð9Þ
n
KS þ ½Sꢀ
8
1
.0
0.0
0.24
Rearrangement of the above equation in a suitable form gives,
0
0
.56
.96
kw−kψ
kψ−km
log
¼ n log½Sꢀ− logKS
ð10Þ
2.0
4.0
6
8
1
.0
.0
0.0
w Ψ Ψ
The above relation demands a linear plot of log{(k − k ) / (k −
k
m
)} versus log[S] with the slope value of n (the co-operativity index).