Communication
RSC Advances
of Parr reactor. The reactor is then pressurized by carbon
ꢁ
dioxide up to 25 bar and heated at 160 C for 3 h. Aer being
cooled the reaction mixture at room temperature, the CO is
2
vented out and the mixture was concentrated under reduced
pressure. The resulting residue was diluted with methanol and
the solid material which was settled down was separated by
ltration. The methanol layer was concentrated under reduced
pressure to recover the ionic liquid. The recovered ionic liquid
was reused for subsequent runs. The solid thus obtained was
mixed with water to dissolve the reducing sugars. The yield of
total reducing sugars (TRS) was found to be 72% and the
selectivity towards glucose was found to be 26%. Yield and
selectivity is calculated with the help of calibration curves
generated with commercially available standards using HPLC.
Detailed information on the analytical method used to quantify
glucose and TRS has been given in the ESI† le.
Fig. 6 Effect of time on TRS and glucose yield.
Acknowledgements
We kindly acknowledge Director IIP for his kind permission to
publish these results. Analytical Science Division of the Institute
is acknowledged for providing NMR and TGA analyses. SK is
thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for his research fellowship.
Notes and references
1
F. Guo, Z. Fang, C. C. Xu and R. L. Smith Jr, Prog. Energy
Combust. Sci., 2012, 38, 672–690.
2
3
Y. B. Huang and Y. Fu, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 1095.
S. Suganuma, K. Nakajima, M. Kitano, D. Yamaguchi,
H. Kato, S. Hayashi and M. Hara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 12787–12793.
4
Fig. 7 Recyclability of TMG$HSO ionic liquid.
4
5
6
7
8
9
G. Feng and Z. Fang, Series: Green Energy and Technology,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 339–366.
X. Zhao, J. Wang, C. Chen, Y. Huang, A. Wang and T. Zhang,
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 3439–3442.
(
third run), 24.5% and 69% (fourth run) respectively. These
results suggested that the recovered catalyst exhibited almost
similar activity and can be reused at least for four runs without
signicant loss in catalytic activity.
D. Verma, R. Tiwari and A. K. Sinha, RSC Adv., 2013, 3,
13265–13272.
In summary, we have demonstrated the signicance
R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear, J. D. Holbrey and R. D. Rogers, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 4974–4975.
R. C. Remsing, R. P. Swatloski, R. D. Rogers and G. Moyna,
Chem. Commun., 2006, 1271–1273.
enhancement in reaction rates by using CO
TMG$HSO ionic liquid catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose in water.
The addition of CO2 exhibited remarkable enhancement in
product yield and afforded maximum TRS yields 72% with 26%
glucose. In addition, the amount of catalyst used had great effect
2
as additive in
4
C. Li, Q. Wang and Z. K. Zhao, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 177–
182.
4
on the hydrolysis products. When the dosage of TMG$HSO was
1
1
0 C. Li and Z. K. Zhao, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1847–1850.
1 R. Rinaldi, R. Palkovits and F. Schuth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
higher, the dehydration rate of monosaccharide increased, which
led to less accumulation of TRS and the increase of further
dehydration products. The developed ionic liquid was found to
be easily recoverable and recyclable for subsequent four runs
without any signicant loss in efficiency.
2008, 47, 8047–8050.
1
1
2 H. Watanable, Carbohydr. Polym., 2010, 80, 1168–1171.
3 R. Rinaldi, N. Niklas, J. Vom Stein, R. Palkovits and
F. Schueth, ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 266–276.
14 F. Liu, R. K. Kamat, I. Noshadi, D. Peck, R. S. Parnas,
A. Zheng, C. Qi and Y. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49,
Typical experimental procedure for the
hydrolysis of cellulose
8
456–8458.
1
5 W. B. Mellvaine, M. P. Foley, W. M. Reichert, J. J. Mandia,
L. M. Haverhals, D. W. O. Sullivan, H. C. De Long and
P. C. Trulove, ECS Trans., 2010, 33, 109–116.
Cellulose (0.25 g) and ionic liquid (2.0 g) was mixed in 5 mL of
water. The resulting mixture was then transferred to the 15 mL
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 58238–58242 | 58241