Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
0
.71069 Å). The structure was solved with direct methods and refined
After removal of Pd−C by filtration, filtrate was evaporated. The
residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
with full-matrix least-squares (teXsan). Infrared spectra were recorded
on a JASCO FT/IR-660 M spectrometer. Steady-state UV−vis
absorption spectra were measured in anhydrous dichloromethane
and MTHF with a JASCO V-570 spectrometer. The nanosecond time-
resolved difference absorption spectra were obtained using the third
harmonic (THG) of a Nd :YAG laser (Continuum Mini-lite II, λ
3
system comprised a 150-W Xe lamp as the light source, a UNISOKU-
MD200 monochromator, and a photomultiplier.
Computational Details. All geometry optimizations and tran-
sition state calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 program.
The optimized structures of E,Z-2 and syn,anti-3 have no imaginary
frequency, and the transition structures have one imaginary frequency
at the saddle points. The single point calculations with UB3LYP/6-
(dichloromethane/hexane 70%) to give 8 as a colorless oil (0.40 g,
1
88%). R = 0.14 (dichloromethane/hexane 50%); H NMR (400 MHz,
f
CDCl ) δ 8.12 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (td, J = 6.8 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 2H),
3
7.45 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (dd, J = 8.4 Hz, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (d, J =
6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (td, J = 6.4 Hz, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 3.75 (s, 6H), 3.55−3.51
3+
=
ex
13
55 nm, 4−6 ns pulse width, 7 mJ) for the excitation. The monitoring
(m, 4H), 2.90−2.86 (m, 4H); C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl ) δ 173.50,
3
137.55, 136.23, 133.29, 131.57, 127.56 (broad, 2C), 125.95, 125.62,
125.42, 123.51, 51.74, 34.98, 28.23; IR (KBr) ν = 3068 (w), 3010 (w),
2950 (m), 2844 (w), 1737 (s), 1590 (w), 1512 (w), 1436 (s), 1364
(m), 1295 (m), 1256 (s), 1198 (s), 1170 (s), 1029 (w), 984 (w), 842
−
1
(m), 765 (s) cm ; HRMS (ESI, positive): m/z Calcd for
+
C H O Na: 449.1723 [M + Na] . Found: 449.1729.
28
26
4
3,3′-([1,1′-Binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)dipropionic Acid (9). To
3
1G**, RHF/6-31G**, and CASSCF(2,2)/6-31G** methods were
conducted with the optimized geometries calculated at UB3LYP(BS)/
-31G** level of theory by using the Gaussian 03 program. TD-
a solution of dimethyl 3,3′-([1,1′-binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)-
dipropionate 8 (0.40 g, 0.94 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL) was added
10% aqueous sodium hydroxide (15 mL), and the solution was heated
at 90 °C for 14 h. After the solution cooled to room temperature, the
reaction mixture was poured into 6 M hydrochloric acid and extracted
with ether. The organic layer was separated and washed with brine,
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtration, the filtrate was
evaporated, and then the residue was collected and washed with ether
6
UB3LYP(BS)/6-31G** and GIAO-(U)B3LYP/6-31G** calculations
were also performed with the optimized geometries obtained by a
UB3LYP(BS)/6-31G** method. Spin-flip TDDFT calculation was
performed with the GAMESS 2014 program package, employing the
BHHLYP exchange-correlation functional and the 6-311G* basis set
because the SF-DFT benchmark calculations show a better perform-
ance with hybrid functionals including a larger fraction of HF
exchange, e.g., 50% HF plus 50% Becke exchange, than that with the
to give 9 as a white powder (0.35 g, 94%). Mp 256−257 °C; R
= 0.07
) δ 8.25
6
f
1
(ethyl acetate/hexane 50%); H NMR (400 MHz, Acetone-d
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.59−7.55 (m, 4H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H),
32,33
conventional B3LYP functional.
,4′-Dibromo-1,1′-binaphthalene (6). 1,1′-Binaphthalene 5
0.79 g, 3.1 mmol) was dissolved in chloroform (30 mL) and the
7.33−7.32 (m, 4H), 3.53 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 2.87 (t, J = 8.0 Hz,
1
3
4
overlapped with a broad proton signal of carboxyl group); C NMR
(
(126 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ 173.87, 136.71, 136.57, 132.57, 131.27,
6
solution was cooled to 0 °C with an ice-bath. To the solution was
added bromine (2.6 g, 16 mmol) over 20 min. After the mixture stirred
for 2.5 h, aqueous sodium sulfite was added for quenching. The
organic layer was separated and washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtration, the filtrate was evaporated
127.31, 126.64, 126.06, 125.81, 125.31, 123.87, 34.53, 27.49; IR (KBr)
ν = 3040 (m), 2936 (m), 2688 (m), 2611 (m), 1705 (s), 1592 (w),
1513 (w), 1424 (m), 1384 (m), 1303 (m), 1211 (m), 936 (w), 836
−
1
(m), 765 (m) cm ; HRMS (ESI, positive): m/z Calcd for
+
C
H
O
Na: 421.1410 [M + Na] . Found: 421.1415.
4,4′,5,5′-Tetrahydro-6H,6′H-[1,1′-biphenalene]-6,6′-dione
10). 3,3′-([1,1′-Binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)dipropionic acid 9 (0.34 g,
.85 mmol) was dissolved in oxalyl chloride (20 mL) and heated at 60
C for 14 h. After removal of excess oxalyl chloride under reduced
26
22
4
and the residue was recrystallized from chloroform to give 6 as a white
1
(
0
°
crystal (0.82 g, 64%). Mp 217−219 °C; R = 0.48 (hexane); H NMR
f
(
400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 8.36 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
H), 7.62−7.58 (m, 2H), 7.35−7.31 (m, 6H); C NMR (126 MHz,
CDCl ) δ 137.63, 133.83, 131.93, 129.44, 128.11, 127.45, 127.39,
3
13
2
pressure, the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (30 mL) and
cooled to −78 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. To the solution was
added aluminum chloride (0.46 mg, 3.4 mmol). The reaction mixture
was stirred at −78 °C for 2 h, then warmed gradually to −30 °C. The
reaction was quenched with 1 M hydrochloric acid and extracted with
dichloromethane. The organic layer was separated and washed with
aqueous sodium carbonate, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After
filtration, the filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by
column chromatography on silica gel (dichloromethane/hexane 70%)
3
1
26.98, 126.92, 123.00.
Dimethyl 3,3′-([1,1′-Binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)(2E,2′E)-diacry-
late (7). A flask was charged with 4,4′-dibromo-1,1′-binaphthalene 6
(
0.50 g, 1.2 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (54 mg, 0.24 mmol),
triphenylphosphine (0.13 g, 0.49 mmol), potassium carbonate (0.67 g,
.9 mmol), and tetrabutylammonium bromide (2.0 g, 6.2 mmol)
4
under nitrogen atmosphere. Methyl acrylate (0.33 mL, 3.6 mmol) in
DMF (25 mL) was added, and the solution was heated at 80 °C for 11
h. After the solution cooled to room temperature, the precipitates were
filtered out, and the filtrate was poured into water. The reaction
mixture was extracted with dichloromethane, and the organic layer was
washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate.
After filtration, the filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified
by column chromatography on silica gel (dichloromethane/hexane
to give 10 as a pale yellow powder (0.27 g, 88%). Mp 216 °C
1
(decomposition); R
(400 MHz, CDCl
2H), 7.59 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6
= 0.15 (dichloromethane/hexane 70%); H NMR
f
) δ 8.22 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,
3
1
3
Hz, 2H), 3.55 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 3.08 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H); C NMR
(126 MHz, CDCl ) δ 198.47, 136.39, 133.31, 132.78, 132.57, 131.70,
3
7
0
8
2
5%) to give 7 as a white solid (0.48 g, 93%). Mp 203−204 °C; R =
129.98, 128.28, 125.87, 125.25, 125.17, 38.44, 28.62; IR (KBr) ν =
3056 (w), 3018 (w), 2979 (w), 2945 (w), 2924 (w), 1691 (s), 1599
(m), 1504 (m), 1457 (m), 1434 (m), 1407 (m), 1355 (w), 1317 (m),
1276 (s), 1234 (m), 1214 (m), 1018 (m), 849 (m), 822 (s), 777 (s),
f
1
.14 (dichloromethane/hexane 50%); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ
3
.64 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 2H), 8.30 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
H), 7.58 (td, J = 6.8 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.43
−1
(
dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (td, J = 6.8 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 6.63 (d,
725 (s) cm ; HRMS (ESI, positive): m/z Calcd for C26
H
O
18
2
Na,
13
+
J = 15.6 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (s, 6H); C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl ) δ
385.1199 [M + Na] . Found: 385.1205.
3
1
67.29, 141.80, 140.56, 132.86, 131.91, 131.46, 127.44, 127.21, 126.89,
4H,4′H-1,1′-Biphenalene (11). To a suspension of 4,4′,5,5′-
tetrahydro-6H,6′H-[1,1′-biphenalene]-6,6′-dione 10 (0.34 g, 0.94
mmol) in DCM (30 mL) and ethanol (20 mL) was added sodium
borohydride (0.14 g, 3.8 mmol) under nitrogen atmosphere. After it
stirred for 1 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with
aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic layer was separated and
washed with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After
filtration, the filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by
column chromatography on hydrous (6%) silica gel (ethyl acetate/
dichloromethane 10%) to give 5,5′,6,6′-tetrahydro-4H,4′H-[1,1′-
biphenalene]-6,6′-diol as a diastereomer mixture (0.28 g, 81%).
126.46, 124.48, 123.65, 120.75, 51.85; IR (KBr) ν = 3044 (w), 2991
(
1
w), 2947 (m), 2844 (w), 2367 (w), 1714 (s), 1630 (s), 1576 (m),
437 (s), 1381 (m), 1307 (s), 1249 (m), 1230 (m), 1194 (s), 1174
−1
+
(
s), 1114 (m), 977 (s), 844 (s), 768 (s) cm ; EI-MS m/z 422 (M );
Anal. Calcd for C H O : C, 79.60; H, 5.25. Found: C, 79.33; H, 5.21.
28
22
4
Dimethyl 3,3′-([1,1′-Binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)dipropionate
(
7
8). Dimethyl 3,3′-([1,1′-binaphthalene]-4,4′-diyl)(2E,2′E)-diacrylate
(0.45 g, 1.1 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (10 mL) and
ethyl acetate (90 mL); then 10% Pd−C (50 mg, 10 wt %) was added.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h under hydrogen atmosphere.
J
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX