138
M. LAJUNEN, R. YLI-MANNILA AND O. SALMINEN
solvent deuterium isotope effects in 6.4 M LCIO4(L2O)
(Table 2), however, show that the level of the AAL
hydrolysis cannot be large. Another reason may be some
exceptional behavior of the acetyl group (enolization?),
as was recently observed in the hydration of 3-
Mr Jaakko Hellman for recording the GC–FTIR and
NMR spectra, respectively, and to Mr Ville Nieminen for
his assistance with kinetic measurements.
1
acetylnortricyclane [preliminary values: m*1 = 0.87 Æ
REFERENCES
0.04, m≠2 = 1.04 Æ 0.03 and pKSH
=
1.55 Æ 0.08] (M.
Lajunen and V. Mikkola, unpublished results). The
1. Euranto EK. In The Chemistry of Carboxylic Acids and Esters,
Patai S (ed). Wiley: Chichester, 1969; Chapt. 11.
2. Jones RAY. Physical and Mechanistic Organic Chemistry. Cam-
bridge University Press: Cambridge, 1979; Chapt. 12.
3. Lajunen M. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A 1974; 28: 919–926, 939–
946.
4. DePuy CH. Top. Curr. Chem. 1973; 40: 73–101.
5. Lajunen M. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1986; 1551–1555.
6. Lajunen M. Ph D, Thesis, University of Turku, 1973.
7. Nickon A, Frank JJ, Covey DF, Lin Y-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974;
96: 7574–7576.
8. Nickon A, Lambert JL, Williams RO, Werstiuk NH. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1966; 88: 3354–3358.
9. Cox RA. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987; 20: 27–31.
10. Cox RA, Yates K. Can. J. Chem. 1982; 60: 3061–3070.
11. Lajunen M, Jantunen J, Koiranen P. Acta Chem. Scand. 1999; 52:
728–732.
12. Cox RA. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. in press.
13. Cox RA, Yates K. Can. J. Chem. 1981; 59: 2116–2124.
14. Cox RA, Smith CR, Yates K. Can. J. Chem. 1979; 57: 2952–2959.
15. Cox RA, Goldman MF, Yates K. Can. J. Chem. 1979; 57: 2960–
2966.
16. Cox RA, Yates K. Can. J. Chem. 1984; 62: 2155–2160.
17. Lee DG, Sadar MH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 2862–2867.
18. Lajunen M, Luukkonen K. Acta Chem. Scand. 1999; 53: 209–212.
19. Kresge AJ, Yin Y. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1989; 2: 43–50.
20. Lajunen M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1991; 45: 377–382.
21. Lajunen M, Hirvonen P. Finn. Chem. Lett. 1974; 245–249, 1978;
38–41.
average pKSH
value, 2.4 Æ 0.2, evaluated for both 1
and 2, shows that 1- and 3-nortricyclyl acetates are as
expected more basic than isopropyl acetate (pKSH =
3.43),17 although the difference seems too great.
The parameters in Table 2 allow the estimation of the
rate constants for both significant reactions, the ester
hydrolysis and the hydration of the cyclopropane ring,
with Eqns (5) and (6) at all acid concentrations used.
These are presented in Figs 1 and 2 together with the
observed total rate constants. The curves in Figs 1 and 2
seem reasonable. It is also possible to check the
correctness of the rate constant kÉ(AdE2) for 1, because
the corresponding values have been measured for several
3-X-substituted notricyclanes in HClO4(aq.).5,11,21–25
They are presented, as extrapolated to an acid concentra-
tion of 1.00 mol dm 3 and a temperature of 298.2 K, as a
function of the substituent constant ꢀqI of X in Fig. 3.
26
This shows that the kÉ(AdE2) value evaluated for 1 is in
fair agreement with the others, although its level is only
0.2% of the total disappearance rate under these
conditions.
22. Lajunen M, Sura T. Finn. Chem. Lett. 1979; 233–235.
23. Lajunen M, Kukkonen, H. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A 1983; 37:
447–451.
Acknowledgements
24. Lajunen M, Hintsanen A. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A 1983; 37:
545–552.
25. Lajunen M. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A 1985; 39: 85–91.
26. Grob CA, Schaub B, Schlageter MG. Helv. Chim. Acta 1980; 63:
57–62.
We are grateful to Dr Robin A. Cox for supplying a copy
of Ref. 12 prior to publication, to Dr Martti Dahlqvist and
Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000; 13: 133–138