9120 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 37, 2001
Wu and Dong
vacuum line. Potassium hydrogen [17O4]dibenzoate was prepared as
these techniques are difficult to apply to organic compounds
for various reasons. To our knowledge, there has been only one
preliminary 17O DAS NMR study where an organic compound
was examined.21 In 1995, Frydman and co-workers22,23 intro-
duced a new approach known as the multiple-quantum magic-
angle spinning (MQMAS) method for completely averaging
second-order quadrupole interactions. This new technique
immediately attracted considerable attention because it can be
readily implemented on most commercial NMR spectrometers.
Over the past several years, the MQMAS method has been
applied to a large number of chemical systems containing
common half-integer quadrupolar nuclei. The first 17O MQMAS
study was demonstrated by Wu et al.24 Subsequently, several
research groups have reported 17O MQMAS studies for many
inorganic systems where 17O quadrupole coupling constants are
reasonably small.25-32 However, 17O MQMAS NMR for organic
compounds is still an unexplored area. In this contribution, we
report for the first time 17O MQMAS NMR results for four 17O-
enriched organic compounds, [17O2]-D-alanine (1), potassium
hydrogen [17O4]dibenzoate (2), [17O4]-D,L-glutamic acid‚HCl (3),
and [2,4-17O2]uracil (4). The primary objective of the present
study is to evaluate the feasibility of 17O MQMAS NMR for
studying organic compounds at a moderate field strength (11.75
T) and with a reasonable 17O enrichment level (ca. 40%). In
addition, this study will attempt to address the question as to
whether the sensitivity of the 17O MQMAS experiment is
suitable for studying biological systems.
1
described previously.12 All products were confirmed by H and 13C
NMR. The exact level of 17O enrichment in compounds 1-4 was not
determined in this study; however, previous studies12,34,35 have yielded
estimates for the 17O enrichment level in these systems: 1 (40%), 2
(50.8%), 3 (40%), and 4 (14% at O2 and 24% at O4).
Solution 17O NMR. All solution 17O NMR experiments were
performed on Bruker Avance-400 and Avance-500 NMR spectrometers
with 5-mm broadband probes. Chemical shifts were referenced to an
external sample of H2O. The solution 17O NMR spectrum of [17O2]-
D-alanine exhibits a single peak at 257 ppm at acidic pH values. KH
[17O4]dibenzoate in aqueous solution shows a single peak at 253 ppm.
The solution 17O NMR spectrum of [17O4]-D,L-glutamic acid‚HCl
exhibits two peaks at 251.0 and 263.5 ppm which can be assigned to
the R-COOH and γ-COOH groups, respectively. These values are in
agreement with previous solution 17O NMR studies.33 The 17O NMR
spectrum of [2,4-17O]uracil in DMSO exhibits two peaks at 329 and
247 ppm with a relative intensity ratio of 1 (O4) to 0.61 (O2). This is
in good agreement with the literature values reported by Fiat and co-
workers.35
Solid-State 17O NMR. All solid-state 17O NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker Avance-500 spectrometer operating at 500.13
1
and 67.78 MHz for H and 17O nuclei, respectively. Polycrystalline
samples were packed into zirconium oxide rotors (4 mm o.d.). A Bruker
4-mm MAS probe was used for 17O MAS and MQMAS experiments.
The sample spinning frequency was controlled to be 14 500 ( 4 Hz.
The z-filter pulse sequence proposed by Amoureux et al.36 was used:
P1(φ1)-t1-P2(φ2)-τ-P3(φ3)-ACQ(t2,φ4) where φ1 ) (0°), φ2 )
(0, 0, 60, 60, 120, 120, 180, 180, 240, 240, 300, 300°), φ3 ) (0, 180°),
φ4 ) (0, 180, 180, 0°), and τ ) 20 µs. The optimized excitation (P1)
and conversion (P2) pulse widths were 5.5 and 2.0 µs, respectively.
The radio frequency field strength at the 17O frequency was ap-
proximately 80-90 kHz. The pulse width of the selective 17O 90° pulse
(P3) was 27 µs. The hypercomplex data method37 was used for obtaining
pure-phase 2D spectra. An external sample of H2O (20% 17O atom)
was used for RF calibration and chemical shift referencing. Other
experimental details are given in the figure captions.
Experimental Section
Sample Synthesis. [17O2]-D-Alanine, [17O4]-D,L-glutamic acid‚HCl,
and [2,4-17O]uracil were prepared by acid-catalyzed exchange with
H217O (40.9 atom % 17O, LOT No. IM1378-14, purchased from
ISOTEC Inc., Miamisburg, OH) following the literature procedures.33-35
For example, 150 mg of D,L-glutamic acid monohydrate was dissolved
in 0.45 mL of H217O in a 1.0 mL glass vial. The solution was saturated
with dry HCl gas, sealed, and then heated to 95-100 °C for
approximately 12 h. It was noted that heating over approximately 9
days was required to exchange both O2 and O4 of uracil. Upon
completion of a reaction, excessive H217O was recovered using a high
Results and Discussion
[17O2]-D-Alanine. Figure 1 shows the 2D 17O MQMAS
spectra of compound 1 obtained without and with rotor
synchronization for the t1 increments. Because the 2D spectrum
shown in Figure 1A was obtained without synchronizing the t1
increment with the rotor period, strong spinning sidebands are
present along the F1 dimension. The advantage of this approach
is that the F1 spectral width is not limited by the sample spinning
frequency. However, the presence of F1 spinning sidebands in
2D spectra often results in low peak intensities. In contrast, the
2D spectrum shown in Figure 2B was obtained with the t1
increment being synchronized with the rotor period, TR (i.e.,
∆t1 ) TR). Under such circumstances, the spectral width along
the F1 dimension is equal to the spinning frequency and
consequently all F1 spinning sidebands are folded onto the
central bands. As previously demonstrated by Massiot,38 the
advantage of t1 rotor synchronization is that this approach
enhances the overall sensitivity of MQMAS experiments,
especially for sites associated with large quadrupole coupling
constants. Because the origin of F1 spinning sidebands in 2D
MQMAS spectra is quite complex,39,40 it is often desirable to
obtain sideband-free MQMAS spectra. On the other hand, as
(20) (a) Samoson, A.; Lippmma, E.; Pines, A. Mol. Phys. 1988, 65, 1013.
(b) Chmelka, B. F.; Mueller, K. T.; Pines, A.; Stebbins, J.; Wu, Y.;
Zwanziger, J. W. Nature 1989, 339, 42. (c) Wu, Y.; Sun, B. Q.; Pines, A.;
Samoson, A.; Lippmaa, E. J. Magn. Reson. 1990, 89, 296.
(21) Gann, S. L.; Baltisberger, J. H.; Wooten, E. W.; Zimmermann, H.;
Pines, A. Bull. Magn. Reson. 1994, 16, 68.
(22) Frydman, L.; Harwood, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5367.
(23) Medek, A.; Harwood, J. S.; Frydman, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 12779.
(24) Wu, G.; Rovnyak, D.; Sun, B. Q.; Griffin, R. G. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1996, 249, 210.
(25) Wu, G.; Rovnyak, D.; Huang, P. C.; Griffin, R. G. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1997, 277, 79.
(26) Dirken, P. J.; Kohn, S. C.; Smith, M. E.; van Eck, E. R. H. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1997, 266, 568.
(27) Stebbins, J. F.; Xu, Z. Nature 1997, 390, 60.
(28) Xu, Z.; Maekawa, H.; Oglesby, J. V.; Stebbins, J. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 9894.
(29) Amoureux, J.-P.; Bauer, F.; Ernst, H.; Fernandez, C.; Freude, D.;
Michel, D.; Pingel, U.-T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 285, 10.
(30) Pingel, U.-T.; Amoureux, J.-P.; Anupold, T.; Bauer, F.; Ernst, H.;
Fernandez, C.; Freude, D.; Samoson, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 294, 345.
(31) Lee, S. K.; Stebbins, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 4091.
(32) Bull, L. M.; Bussemer, B.; Anupo˜ld, T.; Samoson, A.; Sauer, J.;
Cheetham, A. K.; Dupree, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4948.
(33) Gerothanassis, I. P.; Hunston, R.; Lauterwein, J. HelV. Chim. Acta
1982, 65, 1764.
(36) Amoureux, J.-P.; Fernanderz, C.; Steuernagel, S. J. Magn. Reson.
Ser. A 1996, 123, 116.
(37) States, D. J.; Haberkorn, R. A.; Ruben, D. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1982,
48, 286.
(34) (a) Steinschneider, A.; Valentine, B.; Burgar, M. I.; Fiat, D. Magn.
Reson. Chem. 1985, 23, 104. (b) Steinschneider, A.; Burgar, M. I.; Buku,
A.; Fiat, D. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1981, 18, 324.
(35) Burgar, M. I.; Dhawan, D.; Fiat, D. Org. Magn. Reson. 1982, 20,
184.
(38) Massiot, D. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1996, 122, 240.
(39) Amoureux, J.-P.; Pruski, M.; Lang, D. P.; Fernanderz, C. J. Magn.
Reson. 1998, 131, 170.
(40) Charpentier, T.; Fermon, C.; Virlet, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109,
3116.