Assuming that qmax (Fig. 3b) is associated with the distance
between aggregates ~ 97 Å we can estimate the diameter of the
rods using a hexagonal lattice. This gives a width of 22 Å. Using a
cubic lattice does not significantly change the estimated value.
Applying the Onsager10 relation F* = 4d/L for the critical I–N
concentration for polydisperse rods, the length of the aggregates is
estimated to be about 8700 Å. Here we take the critical
concentration F*, to be about 0.01. The contour length for an
average sulfo-Invert PPTA chain is only 700 Å with a diameter of
5.4 Å. Consequently this would imply that there are over 2000
polymer molecules in the supramolecular rod-like aggregates
Since the polymer prepared here is a lyotropic system, it is of
interest to examine the effect of shear flow on the liquid crystalline
texture. Nematic solutions are well known to give rise to a variety
of interesting flow phenomena, such as flow-alignment, various
tumbling regimes and band texture formation. As a first result it is
worth noting that upon cessation of simple shear flow,11–12 applied
manually to the sample, a clear band-texture is formed as displayed
in Fig. 4.
Our results indicate the existence of a supramolecular nematic
phase in sulfo-invert-PPTA in water, probably containing a
microstructure of self-organized rod-like aggregates. Initial charac-
terisation of the nematic phase was performed using optical
polarization microscopy and X-ray scattering. Cessation of shear
flow reveals band-texture formation. These results indicate that we
have found a novel self-assembled liquid crystal polyelectrolyte.
Systematic variation of the solution parameters, like concentration,
thermal history, salt concentration etc. may provide additional
information for understanding this result. This will be developed
further in a forthcoming publication.
The authors thank Dr Anton Schotman and Bernard H. Schel,
Teijin Twaron Research Laboratory, Arnhem, The Netherlands, for
the size exclusion chromatography measurements. This work forms
part of the research program of the Dutch Polymers Polymer
Institute (DPI).
Notes and references
†
2-Sulfoterephthalic acid (2). In a 1 L reactor vessel equipped with a
mechanical stirrer and a cooler, 20.84 g (0.111 mol) of 2,5 dimethylbenze-
nesulfonic acid were dissolved in 500 ml of water, and then 82.36 g (0.52
mol) of KMnO4 were added stepwise during 5 hours. The reaction mixture
was heated at reflux during 48 hours, and then filtered to remove MnO2. HCl
was added to the filtrate and immediate precipitation of 2 occurred. The
yield was 15 g (54.5%). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) d 8.33 (s, 1H), 8 (dd, 1H, J
= 1.8 Hz, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) d
169, 167 (COOH), 145, 136.1, 132.62, 130.67, 130.34, 128.656.
Polymerization. In a 500 ml 3 necked flask, 10 g (40 mmol) of 2, 27.5 g
(88.7 mmol) of TPP, 20 g of LiCl and 50 ml of pyridine were dissolved in
200 ml of NMP. The solution was heated 40 °C for 15 min and then 4.35 mg
(40 mmol) of 3 added. The reaction mixture was then heated at 115 °C for
3 hours. The yellow viscous solution was precipitated in 1 L of methanol. A
yellow precipitate was obtained, filtrated and washed with methanol (500
ml) and diethyl ether (500 ml) The goldish powder was dried under vacuum
at 80 °C overnight, yielding 2.3 g (77%).Mw = 10,000 g mol21, PDI =
2.1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) d 11.32ppm (1H, s, NHCO), 10.5ppm (1H, s,
NHCO), 8.85ppm (1H, s), 8.48ppm (s, 1H), 7.5ppm (q, 4H), 7.34 ppm
(1H,s) 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 165.26 ppm, 164.37 ppm CNO, d 144.44,
143.62, 130.69, 129.36, 128.33, 126.54, 125.89, 125.76, 120.9, 120.74,
120.03, 119.89.
‡
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been performed by dissolv-
ing the sample in concentrated sulfuric acid (1 mg ml21) and separating it
using a modified Zorbax column (250 3 6.2 mm), and concentrated sulfuric
acid as the mobile phase (0.1 ml min21). A UV detector operating at 340 nm
was used for detection. From the chromatograms, the Mw values were
calculated using Cirrus version 1.1 GPC software (Polymer Labs). As
references in the SEC analysis, a Twaron (PpPTA) yarn, type 1010 and an
aramid trimer were used.
§
Optical polarization microscopy. The polymer samples were dissolved
in hot water and ultrasonic mixing at 60 °C for 2 hours and cooled down at
room temperature before further observation. A Jenapol microscope (3003
magnification) has been used to study the solutions between crossed
polarizer’s.
¶
X-ray scattering. Bruker-Nonius D8-Discover set-up with a 2D detector
has been used to perform the experiment. The sample was at 60 °C and the
sample to detector distance set at 29cm, and the incident beam wavelength
is 1.54 Å. In order to enhance the alignment of the liquid crystalline
solution, the sample was subjected to a magnetic field of approximately 4T
in the horizontal direction.
1 H. C. Yun, Y. Chu-Evan, Y. K. Han, J. L. Lee, T. K. Kwei and Y.
Okamoto, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 2185.
2 S. Viale, W. F. Jager and S. J. Picken, Polymer, 2003, 44, 7843.
3 Y. Chu-Evan, Z. S. Xu, C. M. Lee, C. K. F. Sek, Y. Okamoto, E. M.
Pearce and T. K. Kwei, J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys., 1995, 33(1),
71–75.
Fig. 3 (a) XRD of a 6wt% solution at 60 °C and subjected to a magnetic field
along the horizontal direction, (b) 2-theta scan and (c) azimuthal scan along
the peak.
4 E. Mendes, S. Viale, O. Santin, M. Heinrich and S. J. Picken, J. Appl.
Crystallogr., 2003, 36, 1000.
5 P. Cavalleri, A. Ciferri, C. Dell’Erba, M. Novi and B. Purevsuren,
Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 3513.
6 N. Yamazaki, N. Natsumoto and F. Higashi, J. Polym. Sci. Polym.
Chem. Ed., 1975, 13, 1373.
7 F. S. Higashi, I. Ogata and Y. Aoki, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed.,
1982, 20, 2081.
8 W. R. Krigbaum, R. Kotek, Y. Mihara and J. Preston, J. Polym. Sci.
Polym. Chem. Ed., 1984, 22, 4045.
9 S. Russo, A. Mariani and S. L. E. Mazzani, Macromol. Symp., 1997,
118, 73.
10 L. Onsager, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1949, 51, 627.
11 J. T. Gleeson, R. G. Larson, D. W. Mead, G. Kiss and P. E. Cladis, Liq.
Cryst., 1992, 11, 341.
Fig. 4 Band-texture formed after cessation of simple shear flow on a 6wt%
“sulfo-invert-PPTA” solution in water.
12 R. G. Larson and D. W. Mead, Liq. Cryst., 1992, 12, 751.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 5 9 6 – 1 5 9 7
1597