Z.-R. Wang, et al.
PhytochemistryLetters35(2020)206–210
was revealed and was connected to C-3, which was supported by the
HMBC correlations of H3-4′/C-2′, H3-4′/C-3′, H3-4′/C-5′, H3-5′/C-2′, H3-
5′/C-3′, and H3-5′/C-4′, as well as the key HMBC correlation of H2-1′/C-
3 (Fig. 3). The strong HMBC correlation between H-1″ and C-5 was used
to place the sugar moiety at C-5 through an oxygen bridge (Fig. 3).
the MS data.
The absolute configuration of the sugar motif was determined by the
Acid hydrolysis of 1 provided D-glucose, which was identified by direct
comparison with an authentic sample (Experimental Section and Fig.
S25). Therefore, the structure of compound 1 was established accord-
ingly. Compound 1 was assigned the name pleoniol A.
Compound 2 (Fig. 2) was also isolated as a colourless powder. It had
a molecular formula of C15H20O3 according to ESI-HRMS. The 1H NMR
spectrum of 2 (Fig. S10) indicated the presence of five singlet methyl
groups (δH 1.71, 1.81, 2.16, 2.17, and 2.47), one oxygenated methylene
(δH 4.29, d, J =7.0 Hz), one olefinic/aromatic proton (δH 5.58, t, J
=7.0 Hz), and two remaining singlet protons at δH 10.3 and 12.5. The
1H NMR data with the aid of 13C NMR and HSQC spectra of 2 (Figs. S11
and S12) identified five singlet methyl groups, one methylene group
(oxygenated), and an aldehyde group (δH 10.3; δC 194.7), together with
eight aromatic/olefinic carbons including one methine (δC 119.8), and
two oxygenated quaternary carbons (δC 161.7, and 163.4). The above
data for compound 2 suggested highly similar structural features to
those of compound 1, except for the absence of one oxygenated me-
thylene and a sugar moiety. Considering the key HMBC correlations
between H-10 and C-5 and C-6 and between H3-7 and C-6, as well as the
chemical shift of C-10, the aldehyde group in 2 instead of the oxyge-
nated methylene in 1 was placed at C-6 (Fig. 3). A free hydroxyl group
was placed at C-5 through the analysis of the key HMBC correlations
between 5-OH and C-4, C-5, and C-6 (Fig. 3). Accordingly, the structure
of compound 2 was determined. Compound 2 was named pleoniol B.
Compound 3 was obtained as a colourless powder and named
pleoniol C. It was assigned the molecular formula C15H20O4, showing it
had one additional oxygen atom compared with 2. Moreover, the 1H
and 13C NMR spectra of compound 3 (Figs. S17 and S18) showed that
its structure was similar to that of 2, except for the absence of H-10 and
5-OH in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3, and the upfield shift of C-10 in the
13C NMR spectrum of 3. The analysis of the above difference indicated
that the carboxyl group in 3, instead of the aldehyde moiety in 2, was
located at C-6, which was also supported by the 2D NMR data (Fig. 3
and Figs. S19–S21). The structure of the known compound 4 was elu-
cidated as (3R,4R)-3,4-dihydro-3,4,8-trihydroxy-1(2H)-naphthalenone
based on comparison of its NMR and CD data (Fig. S27) with those
Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Bacillus
subtilis (ATCC 9372) along with the Gram-negative bacteria Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and
their antifungal activities against two plant pathogens, Colletotrichum
musae [ACCC (Agricultural Culture Collection of China) 31244] and
Colletotrichum coccodes (ACCC 36067), were determined. Furthermore,
their cytotoxic activities against the A549, MDA-MB-231, CT-26, and
MCF-7 cancer cell lines were also evaluated. Unfortunately, in contrast
to the positive controls, none of the compounds were effective at the
given concentrations against the tested microorganisms or cancer cells.
Fig. 1. HPLC-DAD profiles (210 nm) of ethyl acetate extracts of the culture of
Pleosporales sp. F46, the culture of A. pilosum F47, the co-culture of Pleosporales
sp. F46 and A. pilosum F47, the culture of Pleosporales sp. F46 by feeding
sterilized fungal material from A. pilosum F47, and the culture of A. pilosum F47
by feeding sterilized fungal material from Pleosporales sp. F46.
interaction process, the EtOAc extract of the co-culture was fractionated
by flash chromatography, gel permeation chromatography (GPC) on
Sephadex LH-20, and semi-preparative HPLC to afford compounds 1–4,
which were not detected when the endophyte was cultured alone or
cultured with autoclaved fungal materials (Fig. 1).
HRMS. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (Fig. S1) showed the presence of five
singlet methyl groups (δH 1.66, 1.75, 2.11, 2.22, and 2.22), one olefinic
proton (δH 5.52), and the remaining oxygenated methylenes or me-
thines. Its 13C NMR spectrum (Fig. S2) exhibited 21 carbon signals in-
cluding two oxygenated aromatic/olefinic carbons (δC 151.5, and
155.2). The 1D NMR data (Table 1) in combination with the HSQC
genated methylenes, and five oxygenated methines, together with eight
olefinic/aromatic carbons including one methine.
Interpretation of the 1H-1H COSY NMR spectrum (Fig. S3) identified
connections between C-1′ and C-2′, and C-1″ to C-6″, indicating the
presence of a sugar motif in the structure. The structure of compound 1
was further constructed according to the HMBC NMR data (Fig. S5).
Key HMBC correlations of H2-10 with C-1, C-5, and C-6, H3-7 with C-1,
C-2, and C-6, H3-8 with C-1, C-2, and C-3, and H3-9 with C-3, C-4, and
C-5 identified a benzene ring substituted with three methyls at C-1, C-2,
and C-4 (Fig. 3). In addition, an oxygenated methylene (C-10) was at-
tached to C-6 of the aromatic ring. An oxygenated dimethylallyl group
Fig. 2. Chemical structures of compounds 1–4.
207