Table 3 Results obtained in the MPV reduction of cyclohexanone with alkan-2-ols using catalyst HT-500
Catalytic activity
(mmol alcohol/h)
Entry
Alcohol
T /ЊC
t/h
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Hexan-2-ol
Pentan-2-ol
Butan-2-ol
Propan-2-ol
Hexan-3-ol
Pentan-3-ol
136
118
98
82
135
115
7
8
8.5
10
7
8
97.9
98.0
96.1
95.0
96.2
96.8
3.240
2.249
1.559
0.719
2.744
2.030
scheme, the isopropoxide formed from propan-2-ol transfers a
hydride ion that attacks the carbon atom in the carbonyl group.
The synchronous process illustrated in Scheme 2 yields a new
alcohol and a new ketone as the result of the hydrogen transfer.
This mechanism is quite consistent with the results obtained
in the reduction of cyclic ketones (Table 1). In fact, increasing
the ring size in the ketone from five to seven atoms should result
in no significant changes in the complex that is adsorbed on the
catalyst other than steric hindrance; based on the results, the
effect must be insubstantial as it only caused a slight decrease in
catalytic activity and the yield at 10 h was close to 95% in the
three cases. On the other hand, the substituted cyclohexanones
exhibit marked differences as regards the adsorbed complex
that result in substantial differences in both catalytic activity
and yield (Table 2). In addition, the process produces stereo-
isomers. However, as shown below, the proposed model also
accounts for these results.
The most immediate inference from the data in Table 2 is that
introducing a methyl group onto position 4 in cyclohexanone
(entry 3) seemingly has no decisive influence on the final reac-
tion yield relative to unsubstituted cyclohexanone; in fact, the
yield at 10 h was ca. 95% in both cases. When the substituent at
position 4 is much bulkier (e.g. tert-butyl, entry 2), the catalytic
activity decreases by more than 50% with respect to cyclo-
hexanone. The reaction yield is also strongly affected; in fact,
the reaction must be extended to 24 h to obtain results similar
to those provided by cyclohexanone after 10 h. This suggests
the presence of strong steric hindrance in the adsorbed
complex, the effect obviously being much greater with 4-tert-
butylcyclohexanone than with 4-methylcyclohexanone. In
order to examine further the effect of steric hindrance, we
conducted MPV reductions of 3- and 2-methylcyclohexanone
(entries 4 and 5 in Table 2). A comparison of the results for the
three methyl-substituted cyclohexanones reveals decreased
yield and catalytic activity for the 4-substituted ketone in rela-
tion to the 2-substituted compound; this is consistent with the
proposed mechanism since the presence of a substituent at
position 2 must severely hinder the formation of the adsorbed
complex (so much so that the yield at 24 h was only 42.6%).
As noted earlier, the MPV reduction of substituted cyclo-
hexanones produces stereoisomers of the reaction product.
Accordingly, the next step in this work was to check whether
the proposed mechanism would account for the experimental
stereoselectivity results. Based on the data of Table 2, the 4-
substituted cyclohexanones exhibited the best stereoselectivity
results (particularly that with the bulky tert-butyl group). Based
on the proposed mechanism, 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone can be
adsorbed in the two ways shown in Scheme 3, which lead to
a major isomer (cis) and a minor isomer (trans), respectively.
The adsorbed complex that yields the trans isomer exhibits a
stronger interaction between the methyl groups in propan-2-ol
and the tert-butyl substituent than does the adsorbed complex
leading to the cis isomer. As a result, 4-tert-butylcyclohexanol
is obtained in a high cis : trans ratio. This ratio decreases on
replacing the bulky tert-butyl group with a methyl group, which
substantially decreases steric hindrance (and the cis : trans ratio
for 4-methylcyclohexanol as a result). The cis : trans ratio for
the 3- and 2-substituted methylcyclohexanones is even lower, so
much so that 2-methylcyclohexanol is obtained as a virtually
Scheme 3 Transition states in the formation of cis-4-tert-butyl-
cyclohexanol and trans-4-tert-butylcyclohexanol.
equimolar mixture of both stereoisomers. This is consistent
with the proposed model since the two adsorbed complexes
for 2-methylcyclohexanone are similar and lead to both
stereoisomers.
These results can also be explained from stereochemical
considerations such as the fact that the preference for the
equatorial attack, leading to the axial cis-alcohol, is favoured to
reduce the interaction of the axial hydrogens in positions 3 and
5 with the incoming alcohol, a type of 1,3-diaxial interaction.
The nature (tert-butyl or methyl) and the position (3 or 4) of the
substituent modify the geometry and induce changes in the
selectivity (the percentage of equatorial alcohol changes from 7
to 19%). When the substituent is in position 2 the situation is
completely different, in this case, in the equatorial approach
there is a steric interaction between the incoming alcohol and
the methyl group in the equatorial position, so that both
approaches have similar interactions and the stereoselectivity is
very small. The presence of strong steric requirements in both
axial and equatorial approaches accounts for the low yield
obtained in this case.
As can be seen from Table 3, which shows the results
obtained in the reduction of cyclohexanone with different sec-
ondary alcohols, all provided excellent results as regards both
yield and catalytic activity. In the alkan-2-ol series, conversion
decreased in the following sequence: hexan-2-ol > pentan-2-ol
> butan-2-ol > propan-2-ol. Accordingly, hexan-2-ol would be
the best choice; however, because the reaction temperature
would be nearly 60 ЊC higher than that with propan-2-ol,
additional thermal energy would have to be expended, not only
during the process but also afterwards to remove the excess
alcohol, and the hexan-2-one produced. Similar considerations
apply to alkan-3-ols (hexan-3-ol and pentan-3-ol). As can be
seen, there was no significant difference between the results
provided by secondary alcohols with the OH group at position
2 or 3.
Finally, the reuse tests performed revealed that the catalyst
can be recycled at least four times without losing more than
10% catalytic activity. Fig. 1 shows the conversion and catalytic
1124
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 1122–1125