Article
Macromolecules, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2010 115
-
1
9
13 cm . Anal. Calcd for C
scopic): C, 68.15, H, 9.44, N, 9.93. Found: C, 68.18, H, 9.51, N,
.96.
Synthesis of M6. M6 was prepared by the reaction of metha-
8
H
13NO 0.1H
2
O (140.996, hygro-
presence of LiCl in THF in an all-glass apparatus equipped
with break-seals and several ampules under high-vacuum con-
ditions. After a THF solution of M4 was added to the initiator
solution at -78 °C, the mixture was immediately divided into
several ampules and sealed off at -78 °C. Then, the sealed
ampules were placed in an acetone bath thermostated at a
desirable temperature between -20 and -40 °C. After the
given time, the polymerization was terminated with methanol
at -78 °C. The total content of each ampule was diluted to an
appropriate volume, and the concentration of the residual
3
9
cryloyl chloride (15.31 g, 146 mmol) and piperidine (13.08 g, 154
mmol) in the presence of triethylamine (15.34 g, 146 mmol) in
diethyl ether. Repeating vacuum distillations of the crude
product gave colorless liquid of M6 (14.8 g, 96.7 mmol, 66%,
): δ =
1
bp 61-63 °C/0.7 mmHg). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
1
.56 (br, 4H, N-CH -CH ), 1.65 (m, 2H, N-CH -
2
2
2
CH -CH ), 1.95 (s, 3H, CH ), 3.47 and 3.56 (br, 4H, N-CH ),
monomer [M] was measured by GLC with undecane as an
t
external standard. The observed experimental error of [M] was
t
5% in the range 0.04-0.50 M.
2
2
3
2
1
3
5.01 (s, 1H, cis CH
MHz, CDCl
2
=), 5.13 (s, 1H, trans CH
): δ = 20.6 (CH
2
=). C NMR (75
-CH
3
3
), 24.7 (N-CH
2
2
-
CH ), 25.6 and 26.8 (N-CH -CH ), 42.3 and 47.9 (N-CH ),
Radical Polymerization. Radical polymerization of M4 (0.74
g, 5.92 mmol) was carried out with AIBN (0.14 g, 0.80 mmol) in
toluene (20 mL) at 70 °C for 72 h under nitrogen. The reaction
mixture was poured into a mixture of hexane and diethyl ether to
precipitate a poly(M4) (0.30 g, 40% yield, Mn < 500). The
polymerization of A4 (0.67 g, 6.08 mmol) was similarly per-
formed with AIBN (0.11 g, 0.65 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) at
70 °C for 4 h under nitrogen. The poly(A4) (0.67 g, conversion
∼ 100%, M = 4900, M /M = 1.42) was quantitatively
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
(
6
14.6 (CH =), 141.1 (=C-), 171.1 (CdO). IR (ATR): 2935,
2
854, 1644 (CdC), 1618 (CdO), 1469, 1432, 1371, 1294, 1245,
-
1
9 2
204, 1134, 1016, 908, 853 cm . Anal. for C H15NO 0.2H O
3
156.825, hygroscopic): C, 68.93, H, 9.90, N, 8.93. Found: C,
8.83, H, 10.02, N, 9.01.
Purification of Monomers. After careful fractional distilla-
tions, the liquid monomers (M4, A4, M5, M6, and DMMA)
were degassed and sealed off in an apparatus equipped with a
break-seal in the presence of CaH under high-vacuum condi-
tions and diluted with dry THF. The monomer solution in THF
was distilled from CaH on a vacuum line into an ampule fitted
2
with a break-seal and further diluted with dry THF. The
resulting monomer solutions (0.75-0.82 M) in THF were stored
at -30 °C until ready to use for the anionic polymerization.
Anionic Polymerization. All anionic polymerizations were
carried out in THF at -78 to 0 °C in an all-glass apparatus
equipped with break-seals with vigorous shaking under high-
vacuum conditions (10 mmHg). Polymerization was termi-
nated with methanol. The residue was precipitated in diethyl
ether at room temperature. When Et Zn was used as an additive,
the reaction mixture was immediately concentrated in vacuo to
remove THF and excess amount of methanol and again diluted
with THF to precipitate the zinc compounds overnight. After
filtration of the system to remove the precipitated zinc com-
pounds, the filtrate was concentrated by evaporation and pre-
cipitated in diethyl ether. The resulting polymers were further
purified by freeze-drying from benzene and characterized by
NMR and IR spectroscopies and elemental analysis. The fol-
n
w
n
2
obtained after the precipitation in diethyl ether. The resulting
polymer collected by filtration was purified by freeze-drying
from benzene.
1
13
Measurements. H and C NMR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker DPX300 spectrometer (300 MHz for H and 75 MHz for
1
1
3
C) in CDCl
3 6
or d -DMSO. The chemical shifts were reported
in ppm downfield relative to tetramethylsilane (δ 0.00) in CDCl
3
1
for H NMR and CDCl
13
3
(δ 77.1) or DMSO (δ 39.5) for
NMR as standard. Tacticity of poly(M4) was determined by the
C
-
6
29
13
C NMR integral ratio of three split R-methyl carbon signals
appearing at 18.0-21.7 ppm in d -DMSO at 75 °C. Three signals
were assigned as rr (18.0-18.7 ppm), mr (19.2-19.8 ppm), and
mm (21.1-21.7 ppm) triads. Tacticity of poly(A4) was deter-
mined by the H NMR integral ratio of three split methylene
6
2
1
proton signals appearing at 1.1-1.8 ppm in CDCl at 50 °C.
3
Three signals were assigned as m (1.1-1.3 ppm), r (1.3-1.6
ppm), and m (1.6-1.8 ppm) diads. IR spectra were recorded on a
JASCO FT/IR-4100 instrument using either an attenuated total
reflectance (ATR) attachment or KBr disk method. SEC chro-
matograms for determination of MWD were obtained in DMF
-
1
containing 0.01 M LiBr at 40 °C at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min
lowing is the complete list.
1
Poly(M4). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
1.7-2.5 (CH
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl
45.5-47 (main chain quaternary), 49.3 (N-CH , cis to
carbonyl), 52.0 (main chain CH
with a TOSOH HLC8120 instrument equipped with three
polystyrene gel columns (TSK-GEL GMHXL ꢀ 2 þ G2000HXL)
with either ultraviolet (254 nm) absorption or refractive index
detection. The cloud point of poly(M5) in water was determined
by monitoring the transmittance using a JASCO UVITEC-660
spectrometer. Transmittance of 0.2 wt % aqueous solution of
polymer at 500 nm was monitored in a PMMA cell (path length
3
3
): δ = 1.0-1.6 (CH ),
1
3
2
and main chain CH
2
), 3.7-4.7 (4H, N-CH
2
).
C
3
): δ = 15.8 (CH
2
), 18.0-21.7 (CH ),
3
2
2
), 54.1 (N-CH
2
, trans to
carbonyl), 173.0-177.5 (CdO). IR (KBr): 2946, 2882, 1594
CdO), 1417, 1300, 1212, 1039 cm- . Anal. Calcd for C
1
(
NO 0.2H O (128.783, hygroscopic): C, 65.28, H, 8.93, N, 10.88.
7 11
H -
-
1
=
1.0 cm) with stirring at a heating rate of 0.5 °C min . The Tgs
3
2
of the polymers were measured by DSC using a Seiko instrument
DSC6220 apparatus under nitrogen flow. The polymer sample
was first heated to 200 °C, cooled to 30 °C, and then scanned at a
Found: C, 65.80, H, 8.89, N, 10.10.
1
Poly(A4). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 1.1-1.8 (2H,
3
main chain CH ), 1.9-2.1 (1H, main chain CH), 2.11 (2H, CH ),
2
2
-1
1
). C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl
3
rate of 10 °C min . A Seiko Instruments TG/DTA6200 was
3
.8-4.6 (4H, N-CH
2
3
): δ = 15.2
used for TGA analysis at 30-600 °C under nitrogen flow with
(
CH
2
), 32-35 (main chain CH ), 35-38 (main chain CH), 47.9
2
-
1
.
heating rate of 10 °C min
and 50.5 (N-CH ), 173.5-174.5 (CdO). IR (KBr): 2956, 2886,
2
-
1
1
C
1
623(CdO), 1476, 1448, 1364, 1153, 1016 cm . Anal. Calcd for
NO H O (129.169, hygroscopic): C, 55.79, H, 8.59, N,
0.85. Found: C, 57.06, H, 6.59, N, 10.48.
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by a
Grant-in Aid (No. 18550105 and 20550108) from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan. The authors
appreciate Dr. Mamoru Kobayashi at Lintec Corp. for the NMR
measurement poly(M4) samples.
6
H
9
3
2
1
Poly(M5). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
CH ), 1.4-2.4 (6H, -N-CH -CH - and main chain CH
). C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 17-22
CH ), 22.8 and 27.5 (CH ), 46.9 (main chain quaternary), 48.1 and
3
): δ = 0.5-1.4 (3H,
3
2
2
2
),
13
3
(
.0-4.0 (4H, N-CH
2
3
3
2
References and Notes
4
9.2 (N-CH
2
), 51-56 (main chain CH ), 173-177 (CdO). IR
2
-1
(KBr): 2968, 2873, 1601 (CdO), 1456, 1409, 1342, 1182, 1161 cm
Anal. Calcd for C H NO 0.4H O (146.403, hygroscopic): C,
.
(
1) (a) Davis, T. P.; Haddleton, D. M.; Richards, S. N. J. Macromol.
Sci., Rev. Macromol. Chem. 1994, C34 (2), 243. (b) Collins, S.; Ward,
D. G.; Suddaby, K. H. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 7222. (c) Baskaran,
D.; M €u ller, A. H. E.; Kolshorn, H.; Zagala, A. P.; Hogen-Esch,
T. E. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 6695. (d) Kato, M.; Kamigaito, M.;
8
13
3
2
65.63, H, 9.50, N, 9.57. Found: C, 65.63, H, 9.50, N, 9.09.
Kinetic Study of Polymerization of M4. Anionic polymeriza-
tion of M4 was performed at -78 °C with DMPLi in the