1
116
S. Datta, D. A. Lightner
aF ni gd . (3r i gB h ot )n dB l- emn og lt eh cs u( lt eo p row) and bond angles (bottom row) from the X-ray crystal structure of 1 ꢀ TFA of the (left) A-molecule
0
Table 2 Key distances associated with H-bonding in the
crystal of 1 ꢀ TFA
2,3,7,8-Tetramethyl-2,2 -dipyrrin (1, C H N )
3 15 2
1
To 1.00 g (7.35 mmol) of 3,4-dimethyl-2-carboxy pyrrole (2)
3
was added 10cm trifluoroacetic acid, and the reaction mix-
ture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Triethyl
˚
Distances=A
A-molecule
N(1) and N(2))
B-molecule
(N(1) and N(2))
3
orthoformate (4cm , 24mmol) was added, and the solution
was stirred for 1 h. It was then added to vigorously stirred cold
(
NHꢀ ꢀ ꢀOC(O)CF
1.884
2.763
1.838
2.717
1.817
2.693
1.865
2.735
3
water (100cm ), and a brownish solid precipitated. It was
3
NH–OC(O)CF
3
collected by filtration and purified by column chromatography
using dichloromethane as eluent. Yield: 530mg (72%, or 47%
1
.230
1.234
1.262
1.214
ꢁ
when calculated for the trifluoroacetate salt); mp 138–140 C;
1
H NMR (CDCl , 500 MHz): ꢃ ¼ 2.04 (6H, s), 2.27 (6H, s),
3
Concluding comments
7.21 (1H, br s), 7.62 (2H, d, J ¼ 2 Hz), 11.82 (1H, br s),
1
1
2
2.62 (1H, br s) ppm; H ((CD ) SO, 500 MHz): ꢃ ¼ 2.06,
3
2
A similar apparent dissymmetry was found in the
crystal structure [10] of hydrobromide salt 5 (Fig. 1).
.35 (6H, s), 7.69 (1H, s), 8.08 (2H, s), 12.38 (2H, br s)
),
3
1
3
1
1
ppm; C NMR (CDCl
1
1
, 125 MHz): ꢃ ¼ 10.1 (C-2 ,8 -CH
3
1
0.5 (C¼3 ,7 -CH ), 117.4 (CF CO H), 123.6 (C-5), 126.4
The Hꢀ ꢀ ꢀBr distances were not identical (2.30(4) and
3
3
2
(
(
C-3,7), 129.0 (C-4,6), 143.1 (C-1,9), 144.3 (C-2,8), 161.5
CF CO H) ppm.
˚
2
1
.23(4) A), nor are the N–Hꢀ ꢀ ꢀBr angles (151(4) and
ꢁ
ꢁ
3
2
67(4) ) in a pigment twisted by 13 .
X-Ray structure and solution
Crystals of 1 ꢀ TFA were grown by slow diffusion of n-hexane
Experimental
into a solution of CH Cl . A crystal was placed into the tip of
2
2
All nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained
on a Varian Unity Plus spectrophotometer at 11.75 T magnetic
a 0.1 mm diameter glass capillary and mounted on a Bruker
SMART Apex system for data collection at 100(2) K. A pre-
liminary set of cell constants was calculated from reflections
harvested from 3 sets of 20 frames. These initial sets of frames
were oriented such that orthogonal wedges of reciprocal space
were surveyed (final orientation matrices determined from
global least-squares refinement of 4984 reflections. The data
1
field strength operating at a H frequency of 500 MHz, a
13
C
1
9
frequency of 125 MHz, and a F frequency of 470.228MHz
in deuteriochloroform unless otherwise indicated. Chemical
shifts were reported in ppm referenced to the residual chloro-
form proton signal at 7.26ppm and C-13 signal at 77.23 ppm
1
9
˚
unless otherwise noted. For the F NMR, the reference was
,ꢀ,ꢀ-trifluorotoluene at –63.72 ppm. Melting points were
collection was carried out using MoKꢀ radiation (0.71073 A
ꢀ
graphite monochromator) with a frame time of 20sec for 1
and a detector distance of 4.94 cm. A randomly oriented re-
gion of reciprocal space was surveyed to the extent of 2 hemi-
taken on a Mel-Temp capillary apparatus. Combustion analy-
ses were performed by Desert Analytics, Tucson, AZ. All
UV-Vis spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer l-12 spec-
trophotometer. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC)
was carried out on J.T. Baker silica gel IB-F plates (125ꢂm
layer). For purification, column chromatography was carried
out using silica gel, 60–200 mesh (M. Woelm, Eschwege). All
solvents were reagent grade obtained from Fisher or Acros.
Deuterated chloroform and dimethylsulfoxide were from
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-
pyrrole carboxylate (3) [4–6, 8], 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrolecar-
boxylic acid (2) [4], and 3,4-dimethyl-2-formyl-1H-pyrrole (4)
˚
spheres and to a resolution of 0.66 A. Four major sections of
ꢁ
frames were collected with 0.5 steps in ! at 600 different ꢄ
ꢁ
settings and a detector position of 27 in 2ꢅ for 1. The inten-
sity data were corrected for absorption and decay (SADABS)
[12]. Final cell constants were calculated from the xyz cen-
troids of strong reflections from the actual data collection after
integration (SAINT 6.45, 2003) [13]. Crystal data and refine-
ment information for 1 may be found in Table 3.
The structure was solved and refined using SHELXL-L [14].
The monoclinic space group P2(1)=c for 1 was determined
based on systematic absences and intensity statistics. A direct-
[2, 3a] were prepared as previously reported [2a, 4].