in DMF at 100 °C for 20 min. Their catalytic efficiency was
evaluated by choosing asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-ar-
ylacrylic acids, 2-phenylacryclic acid 1 and 2-[p-(2-methylpro-
pyl)phenyl]acrylic acid 2, as the model reactions. All dendritic
Ru-BINAP complexes were tested, and complete conversions
of 1 or 2 were obtained with high enantioselectivities in 4 h. The
preliminary results are summarized in Table 1. The dendritic
catalysts showed similar enantio-selectivity to Ru-BINAP. The
high catalytic activity and enantioselectivity were probably due
to the homogeneous nature of the reaction. The number of the
alkyl end groups of the dendritic wedges slightly influenced the
reaction performance and the results depended on the solubility
of the dendrimer in hexane.
As shown in Table 1, similar enantioselectivities were
obtained by using a mixture of ethanol/hexane in a different
ratio as solvent (entries 3–5). However, when using a mixture of
ethanol/hexane/H2O (1+1+0.05) as solvent, much lower conver-
sion and enantioselectivity were obtained in the hydrogenation
of 2 (entries 13 vs 14). This profound solvent effect was mainly
due to phase separation upon the addition of a little water, which
thus resulted in mass transfer limitations.
Another unique feature of this system was the facile catalyst
recycling via liquid–liquid biphasic separation technique. It was
found that these dendrimers with an alkyl-functionalized
periphery preferred to dissolve in a non-polar solvent system. In
the case of the second-generation dendrimer ligands AB2-G2
and AB3-G2, more than 99% of their Ru complexes could be
extracted to the non-polar hexane phase in a n-hexane/ethanol
(2.5% H2O) biphasic system. For example, upon completion of
the catalytic hydrogenation of 2, a small amount of water (2.5%)
was added to the reaction mixture to induce phase separation.
The hexane layer, which contained the catalyst AB2-G2-Ru
(about 99.3% of catalyst was recovered), was separated and
reused in the next round of reaction. The recovered catalyst gave
similar conversions in 2 h reaction times under 50 or 80 atm H2
with only slight loss of enantioselectivity over at least three
cycles (entries 15–18). In order to further demonstrate the
recovery of the catalyst, the colorless ethanol layer which
contained the reduced product was further used to catalyse the
hydrogenation of 1 under the same reaction conditions, but did
not, however, give any hydrogenated product.
In conclusion, peripherally alkyl-functionalized dendritic
Ru-BINAP catalysts have been synthesized and employed for
asymmetric hydrogenation using a mixture of ethanol/hexane as
reaction medium. The combination of chiral dendritic catalyst
and organic biphasic system provided high catalytic activity and
enantioselectivity as well as efficient and easy catalyst re-
cycling. Since light alcohols (e.g. ethanol and methanol) have
been found to be the best solvents for most asymmetric
hydrogenation reactions, this system can be extended to other
chiral phosphine-containing catalysts. Thus, this strategy will
lead to a general method of separating products from homoge-
neous catalysts and recovering the chiral catalysts by simple
liquid–liquid biphasic separation. The investigation of other
hydrogenation reactions and the extension of this strategy to
other chiral diphosphine systems are in progress.
We thank National Natural Science Foundation of China
(projects 20132010 and 29904009), CMS, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University ASD
Fund for financial support of this study.
Notes and references
1 G. Q. Lin, Y. M. Li and A. S. C. Chan, Principles and Applications of
Asymmetric Synthesis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2001.
2 R. Noyori, Acc. Chem. Res., 1990, 23, 345.
3 Chiral Catalyst Immobilization and Recycling, ed.D. E. De Vos, I. F. J.
Vankelecom and P. A. Jacobs, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
4 Insoluble polymer-supported BINAP ligands, see: (a) D. J. Bayston, J.
L. Fraser, M. R. Ashton, A. D. Baxter, M. E. C. Polywka and E. Moses,
J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3137; (b) R. ter Halle, B. Colasson, E. Schulz
and M. Lemaire, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 643.
Table 1 Dendritic Ru-BINAP catalysed asymmetric hydrogenation and
catalyst recyclinga
5 Immobilized Ru-BINAP catalysts for biphasic hydrogenation, see: (a)
K. T. Wan and M. E. Davis, Nature, 1994, 370, 449; (b) Q. H. Fan, G.
J. Deng, X. M. Chen, W. C. Xie, D. Z. Jiang, D. S. Liu and A. S. C.
Chan, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2000, 159, 37; (c) R. A. Brown, P. Pollet,
E. McKoon, C. A. Eckert, C. L. Liotta and P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 1254.
6 Soluble polymer-supported BINAP ligands, see: (a) Q. H. Fan, C. Y.
Ren, C. H. Yeung, W. H. Hu and A. S. C. Chan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 7407; (b) Q. H. Fan, G. J. Deng, C. C. Lin and A. S. C. Chan,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12, 1241; (c) H. B. Yu, Q. S. Hu and L.
Pu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 6500; (d) Q. H. Fan, G. H. Liu, G. J.
Deng, X. M. Chen and A. S. C. Chan, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42,
9047.
7 For later examples of thermomorphic catalysts, see: (a) I. Horvath and
J. Rabai, Science, 1994, 266, 72; (b) D. E. Bergbreiter, P. L. Osburn, A.
Wilson and E. M. Sink, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9058; (c) D. E.
Bergbreiter, P. L. Osburn and J. D. Frels, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
11105; (d) T. Mizugaki, M. Murata, M. Ooe, K. Ebitani and K. Kaneda,
Chem. Commun., 2002, 52.
bConv.
H2 (atm) Time (h) (%)
Entry Sub. Ligand
bE.e. (%)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(R)-BINAP
AB2-G1
AB2-G2
AB2-G2
AB2-G2
AB3-G1
AB3-G2
(R)-BINAP
AB2-G1
AB2-G2
AB3-G1
AB3-G2
AB3-G1
AB3-G1
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2.5
2.5
2
2
2
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
87
88
87
86
85
88
84
89
90
90
90
89
91
80
2
3
4c
5d
6
7
8
9
10
8 R. T. Baker and W. Tumas, Science, 1999, 284, 1477.
9 Similar strategy has been applied to hydroformylation of higher olefins,
see: A. G. Abatjoglou, R. R. Peterson and D. R. Bryant, Chem. Ind.,
1996, 68, 133.
10 For comprehensive reviews on dendritic organometallic catalysts, see:
(a) G. E. Oosterom, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer and P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1828; (b) D. Astruc and F.
Chardac, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 2991.
11 For later examples of chiral dendritic catalysts, see: (a) Q. S. Hu, V.
Pugh, M. Sabat and L. Pu, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 7528; (b) H. Seller,
C. Faber, P. B. Rheiner and D. Seebach, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5, 3692;
(c) C. Köllner, B. Pugin and A. Togni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
10274; (d) R. Breinbauer and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2000, 39, 3604; (e) Y. C. Chen, T. F. Wu, J. G. Deng, H. Liu, Y. Z. Jiang,
M. C. K. Choi and A. S. C. Chan, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1488; (f) Q.
H. Fan, Y. M. Chen, X. M. Chen, D. Z. Jiang, F. Xi and A. S. C. Chan,
Chem. Commun., 2000, 789; (g) Q. H. Fan, G. H. Liu, X. M. Chen, G.
J. Deng and A. S. C. Chan, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12, 1559.
11
12
13
14e
15
16
17
18
38
AB2-G2 (run 1)f 50 (80)
AB2-G2 (run 2)f 50 (80)
AB2-G2 (run 3)f 50 (80)
AB2-G2 (run 4)f 50 (80)
72 (94) 84 (90)
70 (93) 84 (90)
69 (93) 81 (89)
68 (91) 82 (89)
2
a Reaction conditions: sub./cat. = 100 (mol/mol); NEt3/sub. = 3+2 (mol/
mol); rt. b Based on GC analysis. The absolute configuration of product is
(R). c A mixture of hexane/ethanol = 2+3 (v/v) was used as solvent. d A
mixture of hexane/ethanol = 3+2 (v/v) was used as solvent. e Hydrogen-
ation was carried out under two-phase condition by using a mixture of
hexane/ethanol/H2O = 1+1+0.05 (v/v) as solvent. f Hydrogenation was
carried out under 50 and 80 atm H2 using recovered catalyst.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1570–1571
1571