lactones (e.g., 2) from lactones (1) via an intermediate enolate
(Scheme 1). In a later study, the R-phosphono lactones were
condensed with propionaldehyde under different standard HWE
protocols, and conditions were reported that favored formation
of either the E- or the Z-alkylidene product (3 or 4).8 While
conditions then reported as Z-selective have been applied in
other systems,9 a recent report also found predominance of the
Z-olefin isomer under what appeared to be the conditions
originally reported to favor the E-isomer.10 In the recent case,
treatment of the R-phosphono lactone 2 with potassium hex-
amethyldisilazane (KHMDS), 18-crown-6, and butyraldehyde
gave predominant formation of the Z-isomer (1:18, E/Z),10 while
reaction of phosphonate 2 with propionaldehyde had been
reported to afford almost exclusively the E-isomer 3.8 This has
prompted us to reexamine the HWE condensations of phos-
phonate 2 and some closely related compounds in more detail.
The results of these studies suggest that it is possible to obtain
either olefin isomer 3 or 4 from this condensation with only
small changes in the reaction conditions.
Temperature Effects on Stereocontrol in the
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons Condensation of
r-Phosphono Lactones
Jose S. Yu and David F. Wiemer*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1294
ReceiVed April 6, 2007
SCHEME 1. Prior Syntheses and HWE Condensations of
Phosphonate 26-8
The Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons condensation of some
R-phosphono lactones has been examined for conditions that
impact product stereochemistry. The temperature employed
to quench the reaction was found to be a major factor. For
example, after the diethyl phosphonate derivative of γ-butyro-
lactone was treated with potassium hexamethyldisilazane, 18-
crown-6, and propionaldehyde at -78 °C in THF, an aliquot
transferred to a flask at ∼30 °C gave almost exclusively the
Z-olefin product, while one allowed to warm to room
temperature over several hours greatly favored the E-olefin.
The Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) condensation has
become an important method for preparation of R,â-unsaturated
esters.1 In its earliest descriptions,2 this reaction of an R-phos-
phono ester with an aldehyde or ketone was used to obtain the
E-olefin isomer, but several more recent studies have revealed
strategies that can be employed to favor the Z-olefin. The
Z-selective reactions generally have used carefully chosen
phosphonate esters, including trifluoroethyl3 or substituted
phenyl esters,4,5 but the reaction also is known to be sensitive
to the presence of additives that complex with the cation3,5
among other factors.1
1
Because the H NMR spectra of compounds 3 and 4 show
significant differences in the resonance of the vinylic hydrogen11
(δ 6.74 for compound 3 and δ 6.22 for compound 4), at the
outset of these studies it was assumed that in each report the
observed products were due to a minor difference in the
conditions rather than any incorrect assignment. Because
commercial sources of KHMDS provide both toluene and THF
solutions, we first examined whether a difference in solvent
composition might explain the observed results. As shown in
Table 1, in the first trial the R-phosphono lactone 2 in THF at
-78 °C was treated with a room-temperature solution of
KHMDS in toluene, propionaldehyde was added, and the
reaction mixture was forced to warm rather quickly to room
temperature (<1 h). These conditions provided almost exclu-
sively the Z-isomer 4, as determined by analysis of the 1H NMR
Some years ago, we reported the use of electrophilic
phosphorus reagents such as diethyl chlorophosphate6 or diethyl
chlorophosphite followed by oxidation7 to obtain R-phosphono
(1) Maryanoff, B. E.; Reitz, A. B. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 863-927.
(2) (a) Horner, L.; Hoffmann, H.; Wippel, H. G. Chem. Ber. 1958, 91,
61-63. (b) Horner, L.; Hoffmann, H.; Wippel, H. G.; Klahre, G. Chem.
Ber. 1959, 92, 2499-2505. (c) Wadsworth, W. S., Jr.; Emmons, W. D. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 1733-1738.
(3) Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405-4408.
(4) (a) Ando, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4105-4108. (b) Ando, K.
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1934-1939. (c) Ando, K. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 6815-6821.
(5) (a) Touchard, F. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5519-5523. (b)
Touchard, F. P.; Capelle, N.; Mercier, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347,
707-711. (c) Touchard, F. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1790-1794.
(6) (a) Jackson, J. A.; Hammond, G. B.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 4750-4754. (b) Calogeropoulou, T.; Hammond, G. B.; Wiemer,
D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4185-4190.
(8) Lee, K.; Jackson, J. A.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5967-
5971.
(9) Sudau, A.; Mu¨nch, W.; Bats, J.-W.; Nubbemeyer, U. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 3315-3325.
(10) Jung, M. E.; Murakami, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 461-463.
(11) Minami, T.; Niki, I.; Agawa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3236-
3238.
(7) Lee, K.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5556-5560.
10.1021/jo070722+ CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/13/2007
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6263-6265
6263