correlation) NMR spectrum. As shown in Scheme 1, both
regioisomers 1b and 1c have three bond distances to the
aforementioned atoms. Thus, 1b and 1c would be expected
to exhibit cross-peaks.
Scheme 1. Step-by-Step Preparation of Tris-TBs 1a
As the number of TB units in one molecule increases, there
is a need for an easy description of the relative configuration
of oligo-TB diastereoisomers that is not dependent on the
nature of substituents as in (R,S)-systems. In addition, the
chirality on nitrogen of a TB unit is controlled by the chirality
of the second nitrogen of the unit; thus, only a one-letter
assignment should be sufficient. We propose a description
consistent with traditional labeling of the TB shape as the
V-shape using letters V and A. By this notification, bis-TB
in chair (anti-) “conformation” can be assigned as VA-bis-
TB (or AV-bis-TB for the enantiomer) and the boat (syn-)
“conformation” as VV-bis-TB (or AA-bis-TB for the enan-
tiomer). The possible diastereoisomers of linear tris-TBs are
shown in Figure 1. Note that symmetrically substituted linear
tris-TBs can be found, due to symmetry, as only three
diastereoisomers.
Theoretically, in the final step, three regioisomers 1a, 1b,
and 1c can be formed (each as a mixture of four racemic
diastereoisomers in the case of 1b (VVV-, VVA-, VAA-, and
VAV-) or three in the cases of 1a and 1c, in which the VAA-
is, due to symmetry, an enantiomer of VVA-, vide infra).
We isolated two tris-TBs (1a-a and 1a-b) in an overall
preparative yield of 11%. In addition, we found that all tris-
TBs 1a can be converted into the two other respective tris-
TB diastereoisomers (LC-MS). This phenomenon is associ-
ated with the well-known racemization6a,8 of TB units. This
proves that only one of three possible regioisomers, 1a, 1b,
and 1c, was formed as a mixture of diastereoisomers 1a-a
and 1a-b. This strong selectivity in the preparation might
be surprising; however, it is consistent with current knowl-
edge in this area. It has been recently found that 1,2,3,4-
substituted benzene derivatives are formed exclusively. No
1,2,4,5-derivatives have been observed to date.6,7 The
above mentioned facts lead to the speculation that regioiso-
mer 1a is the isolated product. In addition, we studied the
diastereoisomers of 1a by NMR and assigned the structure
on the basis of a missing cross-peak between the CH carbon
atoms of the central benzene ring and the CH2 proton atoms
of TB units (see Scheme 1). In addition, there was a missing
cross-peak between the CH proton atoms of the central
benzene ring and the CH2 carbon atoms of TB units in the
gHMBC (gradient-enhanced heteronuclear multiple-bond
Figure 1. Graphic representation of Tris-TB diastereoisomers.
Thus, we have prepared, via a step-by-step method, the
symmetric tris-TB 1a-a (configuration VVV or VAV) as a
major diastereoisomer of 1a as well as the asymmetric tris-
TB 1a-b with the configuration VAA. The second symmetric
isomer 1a-c was prepared by racemization of 1a-a or 1a-b.
It was detected by LC-MS. The three diastereoisomers of
1a were also characterized by NMR.9
It is clear that the preparation of tris-TBs different from
1a, or the preparation of tetra-TBs or higher oligo-TBs,
would be tedious. A step-by-step synthesis would be time-
consuming and expensive. Moreover, our overall preparative
yield (11%) is low and makes the oligo-TB scaffolds labor-
(9) Tris-TB 1a-a, isomer VVV or VAV: 1H NMR (in CDCl3) δ 7.06
(2H, d, 8.8), 6.99 (2H, d, 8.8), 6.95 (2H, d, 8.8), 6.75 (2H, dd, 8.8, 3.0),
6.43 (2H, d, 3.0), 4.62 (2H, d, 16.7), 4.38 (2H, d, 16.8), 4.18 (2H, d, 16.7),
4.13 (2H, dd, 13.1, 2.6), 4.11 (2H, d, 17.2), 4.06 (2H, s), 3.83 (2H, d, 16.6),
3.78 (2H, dd, 16.9, 1.5), 3.71 (6H, s); overall preparative yield 7%. Tris-
TB 1a-b, isomer VVA: 1H NMR (in CDCl3) δ 7.04 (1H, d, 8.5), 7.02 (1H,
d, 8.8), 6.99 (1H, d, 8.8), 6.96 (1H, d, 8.8), 6.86 (2H, s), 6.74 (1H, dd, 8.7,
2.9), 6.70 (1H, dd, 8.7, 2.9), 6.42 (1H, d, 2.5), 6.41 (1H, d, 2.5), 4.64 (1H,
d, 16.8), 4.60 (1H, d, 16.8), 4.35 (1H, d, 17.1), 4.33 (1H, d, 17.1, 1H), 4.27
(2H, d, 17.3), 4.02-4.26 (8H, m), 3.81 (1H, d, 16.8), 3.79 (1H, d, 17.1),
3.78 (2H, d, 16.8), 3.70 (3H, s), 3.68 (3H, s); overall preparative yield 4%.
Tris-TB 1a-c, isomer VVV or VAV: 1H NMR (in CDCl3; only noncovered
characteristic signals in the mixture after racemization) δ 6.65 (2H, dd,
8.8, 2.8), 6.34 (2H, d, 2.7), 3.63 (6H, s).
(8) (a) Prelog, V.; Wieland, P. HelV. Chim. Acta 1944, 27, 1127-1134.
(b) Greenberg, A.; Molinaro, N.; Lang, M. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1127-
1130.
68
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 1, 2005