C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
pyrrole π orbitals on the other Pc unit contribute to the stabilization
of the LUMO energy, although the interaction between the π
orbitals on the nearest carbons is slightly antibonding. In contrast,
since the relative size of the π orbitals on the cyclophane moiety
of the LUMO+1 is considerably small, the through-space π-π
interactions between the benzene and pyrrole units are weak, which
results in moderate stabilization of the LUMO+1.17 The small
Q-band splitting observed for 2Zn can also be rationalized by
considering the relative size of the π orbitals in the cyclophane
moiety (see Supporting Information).
In summary, we have demonstrated the design and synthesis of
a novel bisphthalocyanine system (1Zn and 1Cu) that exhibited
significantly split and red-shifted absorption in the near-IR region.
It was found that 1Zn maintained the fluorescence properties of
Pcs. The MO model analysis provides a clear-cut picture for the
nature of the electronic communication between the two Pc
chromophores, which could offer a new approach for understanding
transannular interactions of cyclophanes. In addition, since the
phthalocyaninophanes can mimic the slipped-stack arrangement
with significant interchromophore coupling, the present system has
potential application as a novel model of the special pair and
subunits in photosynthetic systems.
Figure 2. (a) Frontier MOs of the B3LYP-optimized 1Zn. (b) Energy
correlation diagram of zinc dimethyl Pc (left) and 1Zn (right). (c) Schematic
representation of the origin of the π-π interaction. The relative π orbital
size is based on the CI calculations. Bonding and antibonding interactions
are indicated by solid and dotted arrows, respectively.
Acknowledgment. This research was partially supported by a
Grant-in-Aid (17350063) for Scientific Research and the COE
project, Giant Molecules and Complex Systems, 2006, from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. A.M.
is indebted to the ERYS (Tohoku University) for a research grant.
Most calculations were performed by using of RIKEN Super
Combined Cluster (RSCC). The authors thank these computational
facilities for generous allotment of computer time.
coplanar Pc dimers.12 The Stokes shift of 1Zn was fairly small
(ca. 190 cm-1), thus indicative of a rigid structure of the molecule.
According to the B3LYP/6-31G* optimized structures, the
average distance between the facing benzene planes is 2.98 Å. The
geometrical parameters of the cyclophane moiety of 1Zn and 2Zn
are close to those of [2.2]paracyclophane calculated using the
B3LYP functional,13 suggesting that a considerable electron
exchange within the π units should be taken into account.14 The
calculated spectral features (ZINDO/S) are in good agreement with
the experimental spectra. It is clearly seen from Figure 2a that the
MOs of 1Zn consist of linear combinations of the monomeric MOs.
The lowest and second lowest energy absorption bands of both 1Zn
and 2Zn can be attributed to long- and short-axis polarized Q
transitions, respectively, since these transitions were formed
predominantly through combinations of MOs derived from Gout-
erman’s orbitals.15 These results agree with the observed coupled
Faraday B terms since transitions of different polarizations generally
have differently signed MCD signals.8 In view of the assignment
of the polarization of the Q-bands, the MO calculation is consistent
with Kasha’s exciton coupling theory.16
The origin of the spectral features of 1Zn was rationalized as
shown in Figure 2b. The HOMO and LUMO are destabilized and
stabilized, respectively, compared with a corresponding Pc monomer
due to the significant orbital interactions, which leads to the spectral
red shift (Qx). Since the stabilization of the LUMO+1 is modest,
the energy difference between the LUMO and LUMO+1 becomes
large, which results in the marked Qx-Qy splitting. The orbital
interaction energies of 1Zn are calculated to lie midway between
those of the corresponding Pc dimer with and without π-conjugation
(see Supporting Information). Figure 2c illustrates a schematic
representation of the π orbitals of the cyclophane moiety in the
LUMO and LUMO+1. In the case of the LUMO, bonding
interactions between the benzene π orbitals on one Pc unit and the
Supporting Information Available: Experimental and computa-
tional details. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Phthalocyanines: Properties and Applications; Leznoff, C. C., Lever,
A. B. P., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1989, 1993, 1996; Vols. 1-4.
(b) McKeown, N. B. Phthalocyanine Materials: Synthesis, Structure and
Function; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
(2) Kobayashi, N. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 227, 129.
(3) (a) Scholes, G. D.; Fleming, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 1854. (b)
Jordanides, X. J.; Scholes, G. D.; Fleming, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001,
105, 1652.
(4) Wheeler, B. L.; Nagasubramanian, G.; Bard, A. J.; Schechtman, L. A.;
Dininny, D. R.; Kenney, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7404.
(5) Kobayashi, N. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K.
M., Guilard. R., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2003; p 161.
(6) Kameyama, K.; Morisue, M.; Satake, A.; Kobuke, Y. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 4763.
(7) Kobayashi, N.; Fukuda, T.; Lelie`vre, D. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3632.
(8) (a) Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 6812. (b) Mack, J.; Stillman,
M. J. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2001, 219-221, 993.
(9) Escosura, A.; Mart´ınez-D´ıaz, M. V.; Thordarson, P.; Rowan, A. E.; Nolte,
R. J. M.; Torres, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12300.
(10) Jelley, E. E. Nature 1936, 128, 1009; 1937, 139, 631.
(11) Lawrence, D. S.; Whitten, D. G. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 64, 923.
(12) (a) Kobayashi, N.; Lam, H.; Nevin, W. A.; Janda, P.; Leznoff, C. C.;
Koyama, T.; Monden, A.; Shirai, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 879.
(b) Makarov, S.; Litwinski, C.; Ermilov, E. A.; Suvorova, O.; Ro¨der, B.;
Wo¨hrle, D. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 1468.
(13) Grimme, S. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 3423.
(14) Modern Cyclophane Chemistry; Gleiter, R., Hopf, H., Eds.; VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
(15) Gouterman, M. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1961, 6, 138.
(16) Kasha, M.; Rawls, H. R.; El-Bayoumi, M. A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1965,
11, 371.
(17) These interactions are anticipated to alter sensitively by the subtle change
of interchromophore separations (see Supporting Information).
JA068528C
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 15, 2007 4517