the first time in our experience of catenanes the structural
solution was obtained using a laboratory X-ray source and
was refined to a final R value of 7.1% despite some disorder
in one of the polyether links (see Supporting Information
for details of the structural solution and refinement).
The [2]catenane structure contains only molecules in which
the naphthalene diimide unit is located inside the crown
macrocycle; the interaction of this diimide with the electron-
rich aromatic diethers is known to be rather stronger than
that with pyromellitic diimides. Such a solid-state structural
preference, presumably directed by comparative interaction
energetics during the crystallization process, has been found
in the solid-state structures of related systems. A familiar
stacked array of complementary electron-rich and electron-
deficient components is maintained (Figure 3), these units
contrast, both diimide frameworks of 13 are substantially
bowed. There are angles of around 5° between the mean
planes of the imide rings within each diimide unit; the
N-methylene bonds are bent by 5-10° away from copla-
narity.
Long axes drawn through the four stacked catenane
components show that the two naphthalene diethers sit
squarely one upon the other (twist angle 1°) while those of
the diimides define an angle of 54°. However, examination
of the relationship of each diimide to its neighboring
naphthalene diethers reveals that each of the distinct diimides,
pyromellitic and naphthalene, adopts its favored overlap
arrangement. Pyromellitic diimides, in simple cocrystals and
within interlocked systems, have been found to favor solid-
state packing arrangements that place the long axes of the
diimide close to perpendicular with those of electron-rich
14
1
,15
1
,5-dioxynaphthalene derivatives. In the case of naphtha-
16
lene diimides, a nearly parallel arrangement is observed.
The solid-state structure of [2]catenane 13 reveals the
simultaneous satisfaction of these donor-acceptor structural
preferences, which also extend to the packing of individual
[2]catenanes in the crystal. In addition to a continuation of
alternating donor and acceptor subunits within the crystal
stacks, the perpendicular orientation of pyromellitic diimide
and naphthalene diether is maintained, as is the preference
for naphthalene diimides to be essentially parallel with this
electron-rich group. The overall structural preferences are
thus maintained both inter- and intramolecularly.
The work described in this Letter indicates that it could
be misleading to expect the deployment of donor-acceptor
interactions to be a sufficient primary design criterion for
new catenane syntheses. In isolation, such interactions do
not provide a sufficient driving force for successful molecu-
lar reaction. Only when the capacity to form C-H‚‚‚O
contacts is also present are successful assembly routes
Figure 3. Solid-state structure of [2]catenane 13.
1
7
uncovered.
being essentially coplanar with only small (1-2.5°) angles
between their mean planes. The naphthalene diether com-
ponents are rigorously planar, and the first O-methylene
bonds are only twisted from these planes by around 10°. In
Acknowledgment. We thank the U.K. EPSRC (J.K.M.S.)
and the ESF SMARTON project of the European Union
J.G.H.) for financial support of this work.
(
(
12) The shortest and strongest contacts (see ref 10) are those to the
central oxygen atom of the polyether chain: H‚‚‚O distance approximately
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures
2
∠
(
.2 Å, C-H‚‚‚O ∠ 148°. All other contacts are around 2.7 Å and C-H‚‚‚O
and analytical data for 7 and 8 and macrocycles 4, 10, 12,
and [2]catenane 13; crystallographic data for [2]catenane 13.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
http://pubs.acs.org.
100-120°. An additional, pertinent, example of a contact of this kind
H‚‚‚O distance approximately 2.9 Å, C-H‚‚‚O ∠ 128°) is to be found in
the structure of a phthalimido-crown, a system that contains both a polyether
chain and an imide-CH2 grouping, see: Ashton, P. R.; Huff, J.; Menzer,
S.; Parsons, I. W.; Preece, J. A.; Stoddart, J. F.; Tolley, M. S.; White, A.
J. P.; Williams, D. J. Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 31-44.
OL991289W
(
13) We had previously attempted to prepare more soluble analogues of
[
2]catenane 3 by equipping the diimide precursor with solubilizing ethyl
groups in place of the methylene hydrogens, see: Hamilton, D. G.; Prodi,
L.; Feeder, N.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999,
(14) Hamilton, D. G.; Montalti, M.; Prodi, L.; Fontani, M.; Zanello, P.;
Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 608-617.
1
057-1065. No interlocked products were obtained from these reactions,
and the product distribution from cyclizations of this modified diimide could
not be influenced in any way with electron-rich template molecules. We
attributed this failure to an inability of the soluble diimide to achieve a
favorable donor-acceptor overlap geometry with electron-rich substrates
as a result of the inclusion of bulky alkyl substituents. In light of the current
results this failure may have as much, or rather more, to do with the absence
of acidic methylene hydrogens occasioned by the inclusion of the additional
alkyl groups.
(15) Hamilton, D. G.; Lynch, D. E.; Byriel, K. A.; Kennard, C. H. L.
Aust. J. Chem. 1997, 50, 439-445.
(16) Lokey, R. S.; Iverson, B. L. Nature 1995, 375, 303-305.
(17) The capacity to form C-H‚‚‚O contacts is partly a consequence of
having “acidic” protons available, i.e. protons attached to electron-deficient
systems. Accordingly, and rather by default, successful systems are likely
to contain electron-deficient components (to provide the “acidic” protons)
and electron-rich donor sites such as oxygen atoms.
452
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 4, 2000