result when two UPy subunits are attached to a suitable
rigid spacer. Thus, cyclic pentamers with 20 hydrogen bonds
are favored with 1,3-disubstituted adamantyl (109° angle),
whereas hexamers containing 24 hydrogen bonds arise
from m-phenylene (120°).10b Similarly, cyclic tetramers
are formed when a metalloporphyrin containing UPy’s
at two vicinal meso-positions (90°) is employed.10d
We reasoned that a 3,6-disubstituted carbazolyl spacer
with an angle of ∼90° would also favor tetrameric cyclic
arrangements, stabilized by 16 hydrogen bonds, and we were
curious to discover whether flat rosette-like or tubular belt-
like aggregates would predominate. To test this idea, we first
synthesized compounds 1 and 2 (Figure 1) from the corre-
sponding readily available nitro-derivatives, resulting in the
direct attachment of the UPy moiety to the carbazole ring.
ill-defined spectrum. Addition of a trace of trifluoroacetic
acid greatly decreased the viscosity, resulting in full solubili-
zation of the species, and a well resolved spectrum compatible
with monomer 2 emerged. It is likely that linear oligomers or
polymers 2n were favored over the desired, though rigid and
crowded, cyclic tetramer 24. CPK modeling studies12 gave a
clearer insight into the explanation for this observation. With
the UPy moieties attached directly to the carbazole ring,
flexibility would be a significant factor when considering the
formation of hydrogen bonds between the monomers. The
assembly of a flat, rosette-like structure would ultimately
result in twisting of the structure (torsional strain) and
subsequent unfavorable hydrogen-bonding angles due to
the presence of the undecyl chains at the inner region of the
rosette. This is highly unfavorable due to steric interactions,
and models show that there is clearly not sufficient space
inside a flat rosette to accommodate the long alkyl chains.
Therefore, the assembly of linear oligomers or polymers is
likely to dominate.
To increase the flexibility, a methylene group was inserted
between the UPy subunits and the carbazole spacer. Thus
compound 4 and the corresponding control 3were prepared.
In 4, the UPy subunits can adopt multiple conformations
(Figure 2) that could generate cyclic oligomers of various
sizes and shapes. Once again, model inspection clearly shows
that a flat trimer or tetramer cannot be built for torsional and
steric reasons. On the contrary, folded structures can easily
be arranged. Indeed, model optimizations12 for either cyclic
trimers or tetramers are fully compatible with propeller-like
shapes where both UPy subunits in each monomer are
pointing to opposite sides (Figure 3a and 3b). In the case
of the tetramer, a very favorable, sterically unhindered
tubular (belt-like) shape can be generated with both UPy
subunits being mirror images pointing to the same side of the
carbazole spacer (Figure 3c).
Figure 1. Mono- and disubstituted carbazoles with UPy sub-
units 1 (12 dimer shown) and 2 (monomer), and schematic
representation of linear oligomers 2n.
Although the well-defined, typical signature for a UPy
1
dimer 12 was observed in the H NMR spectrum of com-
pounds 1 in CDCl3 (sharp peaks at 13.20, 12.36, and 12.25
ppm) in the downfield region,10,11 compound 2 showed only
limited solubility (ca. 5 mM), high viscosity, and a broad,
(8) (a) Zimmerman, S. C.; Duerr, B. F. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2215. (b)
Boucher, E.; Simard, M.; Wuest, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 60, 1408. (c)
Zimmerman, S. C.; Zeng, F.; Reichert, D. E. C.; Kolotuchin, S. V. Science
1996, 271, 1095.
(9) (a) Corbin, P. S.; Lawless, L. J.; Li, Z.; Ma, Y.; Witmer, M. J.;
Zimmerman, S. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5099. (b) Todd,
E. M.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14534. (c) Todd,
E. M.; Zimmerman, S. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8558.
ꢀ
(10) (a) Gonzalez, J. J.; Prados, P.; de Mendoza, J. Angew. Chem.,
ꢀ
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 525. (b) Keizer, H. M.; Gonzalez, J. J.; Segura, M.;
Prados, P.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W.; de Mendoza, J. Chem.;Eur.
ꢀ
J. 2005, 11, 4602. (c) Hahn, U.; Gonzalez, J. J.; Huerta, E.; Segura, M.;
Eckert, J.-F.; Cardinali, F.; de Mendoza, J.; Nierengarten, J.-F.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6666. (d) Ohkawa, H.;Takayama, A.;Nakajima,
S.; Nishide, H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2225. (e) Huerta, E.; Metselaar, G. A.;
Fragoso, A.; Santos, E.; Bo, C.; de Mendoza, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 202. (f) Huerta, E.; Cequier, E.; de Mendoza, J. Chem. Commun. 2007,
5016.
(11) (a) Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F. H.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.;
Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Lange, R. F. M.; Lowe, J. K. L; Meijer, E. W.
Science 1997, 278, 1601. (b) Beijer, F. H.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.;
Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 110, 79.
(c) Folmer, B. J. B.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Meijer,
Figure 2. Mono- and disubstituted carbazoles 3 (32 dimer
shown) and 4 (monomer), and schematic representation of
conformations around the UPy subunits.
€
E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9001. (d) Sontjens, S. H. M.;
Sijbesma, R. P.; van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 7487.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 12, 2011
3187