ChemComm
Communication
resulting in significantly reduced tumour growth in the case of
4b and even disease stabilisation in the case of the maleimide-
containing 3b. Thus, 3b had a significantly higher anticancer
activity (p o 0.01 at day 15) against CT-26 tumours than 4b
resulting in a distinctly lower mean tumour burden (0.38 g vs.
0.18 g for 4b and 3b, respectively, at day 15). Together, this
suggests that the albumin binding of 3b leads either to pro-
longed plasma half-life of the drug and/or a more selective
accumulation in the malignant tissue due to the EPR effect.
Although the exact nature of the involved bio-reductants and
the (sub)cellular localisation of drug activation is speculative so
far, our data prove that maleimide-mediated binding to serum
albumin is a feasible strategy to enhance anticancer activity of
platinum(IV) drugs in vivo.
Fig. 4 Free SH content of HSA at various platinum complex–HSA ratios after 4 h
incubation, 3a (J), 3b (m), 4b (&) [cHSA = 99.2 mM; pH = 7.40, 20 mM phosphate
puffer + 0.10 M NaCl, 2% (m/m) DMSO].
This work was supported by the ‘‘Fonds der Stadt Wien fu¨r
¨
innovative interdisziplinare Krebsforschung’’ (to P.H. and
´
C.R.K.), the OTKA project 103905 (to E.A.E.), the Austrian
´
Science Fund FWF (project L568 to W.B.) and E.A. Enyedy
gratefully acknowledges the financial support of J. Bolyai
research fellowship. We are thankful to V. Arion for collecting
X-ray diffraction data and G. Zeitler for animal care.
Notes and references
§ Crystallographic details: 3a: C16H22Cl2N6O8Pt, Mr = 692.39, 0.12 ꢀ
0.10 ꢀ 0.02 mm, monoclinic, C2/c, a = 26.9636(16) Å, b = 7.7770(4) Å, c =
11.3395(6) Å, b = 106.782(2)1, V = 2276.6(2) Å3, Z = 4, rcalcd = 2.020 g cmꢁ3
,
T = 150(2) K, l = 0.71073 Å, m = 6.454 mmꢁ1, R1 = 0.0181, wR2 = 0.0438,
GOF = 1.007; for description of data collection and refinement see ESI.
Fig. 5 Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)-ICP-MS determination of 3b (50 mM)
in fetal calf serum after 2 h of incubation.
1 M. Galanski, M. A. Jakupec and B. K. Keppler, Curr. Med. Chem.,
2005, 12, 2075–2094.
2 N. J. Wheate, S. Walker, G. E. Craig and R. Oun, Dalton Trans., 2010,
39, 8113–8127.
3 P. Heffeter, U. Jungwirth, M. Jakupec, C. Hartinger, M. Galanski,
L. Elbling, M. Micksche, B. Keppler and W. Berger, Drug
Resist. Updates, 2008, 11, 1–16.
4 H. Choy, C. Park and M. Yao, Clin. Cancer Res., 2008, 14, 1633–1638.
5 K. R. Barnes, A. Kutikov and S. J. Lippard, Chem. Biol., 2004, 11,
557–564.
6 W. H. Ang, I. Khalaila, C. S. Allardyce, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret and
P. J. Dyson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 1382–1383.
7 S. Dhar, Z. Liu, J. Thomale, H. Dai and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 11467–11476.
8 R. P. Feazell, N. Nakayama-Ratchford, H. Dai and S. J. Lippard,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 8438–8439.
9 S. Dhar, W. L. Daniel, D. A. Giljohann, C. A. Mirkin and S. J. Lippard,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 14652–14653.
10 C. L. Grek and K. D. Tew, Curr. Opin. Pharmacol., 2010, 10, 362–368.
11 E. Wexselblatt and D. Gibson, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2012, 117, 220–229.
12 U. Jungwirth, D. N. Xanthos, J. Gojo, A. K. Bytzek, W. Korner,
P. Heffeter, S. A. Abramkin, M. A. Jakupec, C. G. Hartinger,
U. Windberger, M. Galanski, B. K. Keppler and W. Berger, Mol.
Pharmacol., 2012, 81, 719–728.
13 J. L. Carr, M. D. Tingle and M. J. McKeage, Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol., 2002, 50, 9–15.
14 J. L. Carr, M. D. Tingle and M. J. McKeage, Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol., 2006, 57, 483–490.
Fig. 6 In vivo anticancer activity. CT-26 cells were injected subcutaneously into
the right flank of BALB/c mice. Mice were treated on day 5, 8, and 12 (indicated by
.) i.v. with 18 mg kgꢁ1 3b or 4b. Tumour volumes were calculated as described in
the ESI.† Each experimental group contained four animals. Data are means ꢂ SEM.
Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-
test (* p o 0.05; ** p o 0.01; *** p o 0.001 compared to control mice).
15 D. F. Baban and L. W. Seymour, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 1998, 34,
109–119.
To test the impact of albumin binding on the anticancer
activity of the new compounds in vivo the murine CT-26 colon 16 F. Kratz, J. Controlled Release, 2008, 132, 171–183.
17 E. Frei, Diabetol. Metab. Syndr., 2011, 3, 11.
18 F. Kratz, Curr. Bioact. Compd., 2011, 7, 33–38.
19 E. Miele, G. P. Spinelli, F. Tomao and S. Tomao, Int. J. Nanomed.,
cancer model was used. The use of this syngeneic murine
tumour model was necessary due to the recently reported
importance of the immune system for the anticancer activity
of oxaliplatin.12 Both platinum complexes are well tolerated
with no significant loss of body weight (data not shown). As
depicted in Fig. 6, both drugs had potent anticancer potential
2009, 4, 99.
20 M. R. Reithofer, S. M. Valiahdi, M. A. Jakupec, V. B. Arion, A. Egger,
M. Galanski and B. K. Keppler, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 6692–6699.
21 V. Pichler, S. M. Valiahdi, M. A. Jakupec, V. B. Arion, M. Galanski
and B. K. Keppler, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 8187–8192.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2249--2251 2251