Table 1 Energy transfer efficiency of 4
indicating that PBLG was in a random coil state caused by the
destruction of intramolecular hydrogen bonds.
Solvent
Structure of 4
Energy transfer
efficiency (%)
Fig. 2(a) illustrates the fluorescence spectra of 1 and 4 in both
CH2Cl2 and DMSO by selective excitation of the donor unit at
345 nm. In CH2Cl2, the donor 1 shows strong blue fluorescence
at 420 nm, but the acceptor 3 shows practically no fluorescence
around 460 nm. In the case of 4, however, fluorescence from the
donor unit at 420 nm was considerably quenched and emission
from the acceptor unit at 460 nm appeared, indicating that
efficient energy transfer took place from the donor unit to the
acceptor unit. The observed fluorescent properties of 4 were not
affected by the concentration over the range of 1025–1027 mol
dm23, excluding the possible contribution of intermolecular
energy transfer processes. The energy transfer efficiency was
calculated to be 91% from the degree of quenching of the donor
emission, which is high enough for the donor–acceptor distance
of 3 nm.13 Similarly, acceptor fluorescence and quenching of
the donor fluorescence were observed in DMF, a highly polar
solvent. However, only the donor fluorescence at 420 nm was
observed without any sign of quenching in DMSO, indicating
that energy transfer did not take place at all in DMSO. In the
CH2Cl2/DMSO mixture, increasing the DMSO content resulted
in a decrease of the energy transfer efficiency, and no energy
transfer occurred above 80 vol% of DMSO. Decreasing the
DMSO content to less than 10 vol% by dilution with CH2Cl2
induced fluorescence of the acceptor with concomitant quench-
ing of the donor fluorescence again, showing that the effect of
DMSO is reversible. The effect of DMSO on the energy transfer
is in sharp contrast to that of similarly polar DMF (Table 1). In
CH2Cl2, PBLG takes rigid a-helical conformation suitable for
energy transfer, allowing efficient energy transfer (91%) over 3
nm. It is known that DMF is not effective to induce secondary
transition of PBLG into flexible random coil but DMSO can
effectively induce this transition.14 Therefore, observed switch-
ing off of the energy transfer process by DMSO is attributed to
the helix to random coil transition of the PBLG linker (Fig.
2(b)). Since Förster length R0,15 which is the distance when
energy transfer occurs with 50 % efficiency, is estimated to be
2.53 nm in this sets, energy transfer efficiency is below 1%
when average inter-chromophore distance is over 6 nm.
Therefore, it is likely that the donor and acceptor units in 4 are
separated more than 6 nm in the random coil state.
(CH2Cl2/DMSO)
100/0
80/20
60/40
40/60
20/80
0/100
0/100 (DMF)
a-helix
91
84
55
18
0
mixture
random coil
0
82
a-helix
efficient photo-induced energy transfer system which can be
switched on and off by a helix–coil secondary transition of the
oligopeptide linker. These results offer a facile method for
developing energy transfer systems with various peptide
linkers.
We are grateful to Prof. Takashi Kato (Department of
Chemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of
Tokyo) for helping with the GPC measurement.
Notes and references
† Compounds 1 and 2 were prepared as follows: reaction of coumarin 2 and
methyl 4-(bromomethyl)benzoate following hydrolysis yielded 1 (25%),
high-resolution MS (FAB): m/z calcd: 352.1471; found: 352.1556.
Coumarin 343 was reacted with N-(3-aminopropyl) carbamic acid tert-butyl
ester, which following deprotection of the Boc group afforded 2 (64%),
high-resolution MS (FAB): m/z calcd: 342.1739; found: 342.1818.
‡ GPC analysis was performed at 25 °C with a TSKgel GMHHR-N column
(300 3 7.8 mm), DMF as eluent, and narrow-polydispersity poly(styrene)
standards as a reference. The calculated molecular weight of the 20mer of
peptide 3 is 4727, which is in agreement with the observed value (4710).
1 M. Beggren, A. Dodabalapur, R. E. Slusher and Z. Bao, Nature, 1997,
389, 466.
2 A. Nakano, A. Osuka, I. Yamazaki, T. Yamazaki and Y. Nishimura,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3023; T. Akasaka, H. Inoue, M.
Kuwabara, T. Mutai, J. Otsuki and K. Arai, Dalton Trans., 2003, 815.
3 M. D. Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1997, 26, 365.
4 D. Ng and J. E. Guillet, Macromol., 1982, 15, 724; A. Adronov, D. R.
Robello and J. M. J. Fréchet, J. Polym. Sci. A, 2001, 39, 1366.
5 A. Adronov, S. L. Gilat, J. M. J Fréchet, K. Ohta, F. V. R. Neuwahl and
G. R. Fleming, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 1175; A. Adronov, P. R.
L. Malenfant and J. M. J. Fréchet, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 1463.
6 A. I. H. Murchie, R. M. Clegg, E. von Kitzing, D. R. Duckett, S.
Diekmann and D. M. J. Lilley, Nature, 1989, 341, 763; M. P. Lillo, J. M.
Beecham, B. K. Szpikowska, M. A. Sherman and M. T. Mas,
Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 11261; D. M. J. Lilley and T. J. Wilson, Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol., 2000, 4, 507.
In summary, we developed a simple method to construct a set
of chromophores separated by a distance-controlled oligopep-
tide linker, and demonstrated that the system serves as an
7 G. Taubes, Science, 1997, 275, 1420; C. J. Murphy, M. R. Arkin, Y.
Jenkins, N. D. Ghatilia, S. H. Bossmann, N. J. Turro and J. K. Barton,
Science, 1993, 262, 1025; K. Fukui and K. Tanaka, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 1998, 37, 158.
8 L. Stryer and R. P. Haugland, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1967, 58, 720;
G. Gabor, Biopolymer, 1968, 6, 809; M. Kuragaki and M. Sisido, J.
Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 16019.
9 S. L. Gilat, A. Adronov and J. M. J. Fréchet, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1999, 38, 1422.
10 E. R. Blout and R. H. Karlson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1956, 78, 941; E. R.
Blout and A. Asadourian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1956, 78, 955; T. J.
Deming, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9, 299.
11 H. A. Klok, J. F. Langenwalter and S. Lecommandoux, Macromole-
cules, 2000, 33, 7819.
12 M. Niwa, M. Morikawa, T. Nabeta and N. Higashi, Macromolecules,
2002, 35, 2769.
13 Y. Ohya, K. Yabuki, M. Komatsu and T. Ouchi, Polym. Adv. Technol.,
2000, 11, 845.
14 H. Ushiki and I. Mita, Polym. J., 1984, 16, 751; H. Ushiki and I. Mita,
Polym. J., 1981, 13, 837.
15 W. G. McGimpsey, L. Chen, R. Carraway and W. N. Samaniego, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 6082.
Fig. 2 (a) Fluorescence spectra of 1 (— -), 3 (– – –) and 4 (—) in CH2Cl2
and DMSO, (b) schematic illustration of the secondary structure of 4 in both
CH2Cl2 and DMSO.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 742–743
743