Please do not adjust margins
Journal of MaPtleeraiaselsdCohneomtiastdrjyuBst margins
Page 7 of 9
DOI: 10.1039/C7TB02862H
Journal Name
ARTICLE
s.p. injection of 5.0 equiv. of ClOꢀ in the same region. The worthwhile tool for investigating the roles of ClOꢀ in biological
mouse was imaged by using an IVIS Spectrum small animal in and pathological processes.
vivo imaging system with a 530 nm excitation laser and a 600
nm emission filter. Fig. 9 shows representative fluorescence
images of a mouse at different times after the injection of ClOꢀ.
It was demonstrated that the fluorescence intensity was
enhanced gradually within 20 min, proving that RO610 can
detect ClOꢀ in vivo without the interference of background
signals.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Scientific
Foundation of China (No. 21472148 and 21072158), Overseas
Students Science and Technology Activities Project Merit
Funding of Shaanxi Province (No. 20151190) and Academic
Backbone of Northwest University Outstanding Youth Support
Program.
Notes and references
1
(a) B.C. Dickinson and C.J. Chang, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2011,
7
, 504ꢀ511. (b) T. Finkel and N.J. Holbrook, Nature., 2000,
40, 239ꢀ247. (c) D. Oushiki, H. Kojima and T. Terai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2795ꢀ2801.
Fig.10 (Left) Representative fluorescence images of a nude mouse. a,
The mouse was given an intraperitoneal injection of saline (1 mL) for
5 h, finally a intraperitoneal injection of RO610 (0.2 mL, 1 mM). b,
The mouse was given an intraperitoneal injection of zymosan (1 mL,
1 mg/mL) for 5 h, subsequent an intraperitoneal injection of RO610
(0.2 mL, 1 mM). Images were taken after incubation for 0, 5, 10, 30,
60 and 90 min, respectively. (Right) Fluorescence intensities of nude
mouse in panels a, b. Images were taken using an excitation laser of
535 nm and an emission filter of 570 nm.
2
3
(a) M.A. Shannon, P.W. Bohn and M. Elimelech, Nature.,
2008, 452, 301ꢀ310. (b) X. Jin, Y. Jia and W. Chen, Sens.
Actuators B., 2016, 232, 300ꢀ305.
(a) Y.W Yap, M. Whiteman and N.S. Cheung, Cell. Signal.,
2006, 19, 219ꢀ228. (b) M. Whiteman, P. Rose and L.S. Jia,
Free Radic. Biol. Med., 2005, 38, 1571ꢀ1584. (c) F.C. Fang,
Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2004, 2, 820ꢀ832.
4
(a) A. Daugherty, J.L. Dunn and D.L. Rateri, J. Clin. Invest.,
1994, 94, 437ꢀ444. (b) D.I. Pattison and M.J. Davies,
Biochemistry., 2006, 45, 8152ꢀ8162. (c) V. Rudolph, R.P.
Andrié and T.K. Rudolph, Nat. Med., 2010, 16, 470ꢀ474. (d)
F.H Greig, L. Hutchison and C.M Spickett, Clin. Sci., 2015,
128, 579ꢀ592. (e) Y.D. Zheng, H.G. Lu, Z. Jiang, Y. Guan,
J.L. Zou, X. Wang, R.Y. Cheng and H. Gao, J. Mater. Chem.
Subsequently, we explored the feasibility of detecting
endogenous ClOꢀ in vivo. According to the literature,13
zymosan can stimulate cells to produce ClOꢀ. As shown in Fig.
10, The fluorescence measured at the abdomen increased
markedly after zymosan injection, and strong fluorescence was
observed at 90 min. Interestingly, control, unstimulated mice
that were intraperitoneally injected with the probe RO610
followed by saline only (no zymosan) showed a slight
fluorescence enhancement, indicating that RO610 was sensitive
enough to detect native ClOꢀ levels in nude mice without
external stimulation. The result established that RO610 was a
desirable imaging agent for visualizing endogenous ClOꢀ in
vivo.
B
, 2017, 5, 6277ꢀ6281.
5
(a) H.N. Kim, M.H. Lee and H.J. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2008, 37, 1465ꢀ1472. (b) J. Du, M. Hu, J. Fan and X.J. Peng,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 4511ꢀ4535. (c) X.Q. Chen, T.H.
Pradhan and F. Wang, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1910ꢀ1956. (d)
F.A. Mauguière, P. Collins and Z.C Kramer, Chem. Lett
.
2015, , 4123ꢀ4128. (e) X.J. Cao, L.N. Chen, X. Zhang, J.T.
6
Liu, M.Y. Chen, Q.R. Wu, J.Y. Miao and B.X. Zhao, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 2016, 920, 86ꢀ93. (f) H. Li, C. Wang, M. She, Y.
Zhu, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, P. Liu, Y. Wang and J. Li, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 2015, 900, 97ꢀ102. (g) Q. Chen, C.M. Jia, Y.F.
Zhang, W. Du, Y.L. Wang, Y. Huang, Q.Y. Yang and Q.
Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2017,
(a) J. Chan, S.C. Dodani and C.J. Chang, 2012,
(b) M, Beija, C.A.M. Afonso and J.M.G., Chem. Soc. Rev
2009, 38, 2410ꢀ2433. (c) S. Liu, J. Zhao and K. Zhang,
Analyst., 2016, 141, 2296ꢀ2302. (d) C.X. Chen, D. Zhao and
J. Sun, Analyst., 2016, 141, 2581ꢀ2587. (e) L.J. Hou, J. Feng
and Y.B. Wang, Sens. Actuators B., 2017, 247, 451ꢀ460. (f)
5, 7736ꢀ7742.
Conclusions
6
4, 973ꢀ984.
.
In summary, a new rhodol dye ROA with an aldehyde group
has been successfully developed, which exhibits high extinction
coefficients, quantum yield, and good photostability. Based on
the model platform, RO610 was synthesized and it displayed a
high sensitivity, selectivity and short response time for ClOꢀ over
other related species. A549 cells and living mice imaging
studies showed that RO610 could be used as an effective
fluorescent probe for detecting ClOꢀ in biological systems.
Furthermore, RO610 successfully achieved in vivo detection of
endogenous ClOꢀ directly by using living mice without external
stimulation. We believe the probe RO610 can be regarded as a
C.G. Dai, X.L. Liu and X.J. Du, ACS Sens., 2016,
(g) Z.H. Li, R. Liu and Z.L. Tan, ACS Sens. 2017,
1
, 888ꢀ895.
2
, 501ꢀ505.
7
8
(a) L.G. Lee, G.M. Berry and C.H. Chen, Cytometry, 1989,
10, 151ꢀ164. (b) J.E. Whitaker, R.P. Haugland and D. Ryan,
Anal. Biochem., 1992, 207, 267ꢀ279 (c) T. Peng and D. Yang,
Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 4932ꢀ4935.
(a) B.C. Dickinson, C. Huynh and C.J. Chang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 5906ꢀ5915. (b) K. Kawai, N. Ieda and K.A
Aizawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12690ꢀ12696. (c) H.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1ꢀ3 | 7