8090 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 33, 2001
Chiang et al.
M for the alcohol and ca.. 4 × 10-5 M for the ammonium iodide. The
temperature of all reacting solutions was controlled at 25.0 ( 0.05 °C.
Reactions were monitored by following the decay of quinone methide
absorbance at λ ) 400 nm, and observed first-order rate constants were
obtained by least-squares fitting of an exponential function.
lammonium iodide, 4 OX ) (CH3)3N+I-,6 eq 1. Flash photolysis
Results
of these substrates in aqueous solution produced a transient
species with the strong absorbance at λ ) 400 nm that is
characteristic of o-quinone methide.7 Neither the lifetime of this
transient species nor the amount produced was affected by the
presence or absence of dissolved oxygen, which again is as
expected for this transient being o-quinone methide.7
Product Analysis. Analysis of spent reaction mixtures
showed that only o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol was produced from
o-quinone methide generated by flash photolysis of o-hydroxy-
benzyl alcohol in perchloric acid solution, as expected for clean
hydration of the quinone methide back to starting material. When
o-hydroxybenzyl p-cyanophenyl ether was the photolysis sub-
strate, on the other hand, a minor amount (ca. 10%) of an
additional unidentified substance was formed. In acetic acid
buffers, these products were accompanied by formation of
o-hydroxybenzyl acetate.
Because of the unknown additional product formation from
o-hydroxybenzyl p-cyanophenyl ether, this substrate was not
used for rate measurements. It was, however, employed for
quantitative product analysis, where a substrate other than
o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol was needed in order to distinguish the
hydration product from unphotolyzed starting material.
Quantitative product analyses were carried out in acetic acid
buffers using a series of solutions of fixed buffer ratio ([HOAc]/
[OAc-] ) 0.10) and constant ionic strength (0.10 M). The data
so obtained are summarized in Table S1.13
Kinetics, Perchloric Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, and Buffer
Solutions. Rates of decay of o-quinone methide were measured
in dilute perchloric acid solution over the concentration range
[HClO4] 0.001-0.1 M and also in acetic acid and biphosphate
ion buffers, using both H2O and D2O as the solvent. The ionic
strength of these solutions was kept constant at 0.10 M by
supplying sodium perchlorate as required. These results are
summarized in Tables S2 and S3.13
The rate measurements in buffers were made in series of
solutions of fixed buffer ratio, and therefore fixed hydrogen ion
concentration, but varying buffer concentration. Extrapolation
of these data to zero buffer concentration using the buffer
dilution expression of eq 2
Experimental Section
Materials. o-hydroxybenzyl acetate was prepared by treating
o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol with acetic anhydride in the presence of boron
trifluoride etherate,8 and (o-hydroxybenzyl)trimethylethylammonium
iodide was synthesized by methyl iodide methylation of (o-hydroxy-
benzyl)dimethylamine,6 itself obtained by the reaction of potassium
phenolate with N,N-dimethylmethyleneammonium iodide.9
o-Hydroxybenzyl p-cyanophenyl ether was prepared in a one-pot
process by first converting o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol to o-hydroxybenzyl
bromide, using the mild conditions of the Ph3P/CBr4 reagent,10 and
then immediately adding sodium p-cyanophenoxide. A flask containing
an argon atmosphere was charged with 1.00 g o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol,
2.33 g triphenylphosphine, 2.95 g carbon tetrabromide, and 10 mL
DMSO. This mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min, and
1.25 g sodium p-cyanophenoxide was then added, and that mixture
was stirred overnight. The following day, 30 mL of water was added,
the resulting mixture was extracted with two 75-mL portions of ethyl
ether, and the ether extracts were washed with saturated brine and were
dried over sodium sulfate. The residue remaining after removal of the
ether was purified by column chromatography (silical gel with hexane
eluent) to give 0.50 g (28%) of colorless crystals: mp 135-136 °C;
1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ/ppm ) 7.59 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 2H),
7.32-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.99-6.86 (m, 2H),
5.81 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ/ppm )
162.02, 154.80, 134.49, 130.52, 129.72, 122.06, 121.43, 119.44, 116.73,
116.22, 105.17, 67.84; HRMS: m/e ) 225.0790 (calc), 225.0794 (obs).
All other materials were best-available commercial grades.
Product Analysis. Product analyses were conducted by HPLC using
a Varian Vista 5500 instrument with a NovoPak C18 reverse-phase
column and methanol-water (60/40 ) v/v) as the eluent. Reaction
solutions, containing ca.. 2 × 10-5 M substrate and ca.. 4 × 10-5
M
kobs ) kint + kcat [Buffer]
(2)
anisole, which served as an internal standard, were subjected to a single
pulse from our microsecond flash photolysis system.11 Products were
identified by comparing retention times and UV spectra with authentic
samples. The temperature of all reactions was controlled at 25.0 ( 0.1
°C, and parallel analyses of unphotolyzed reaction mixtures showed
that no thermal transformations occurred during the time of the
photolysis experiments.
gave intercepts, kint, which, together with the dilute perchloric
acid solution data, were used to construct the rate profiles shown
in Figure 1. Hydrogen-ion concentrations of the buffer solutions
needed for this purpose were obtained by calculation, using
thermodynamic acidity constants from the literature and activity
coefficients recommended by Bates.14
Kinetics. Rate measurements were made using microsecond11 and
nanosecond12 (λexc ) 248 nm) flash photolysis systems that have already
been described.11,12 o-Hydroxybenzyl alcohol was the photolysis
substrate for all rate measurements except those made in sodium
hydroxide solution, where (o-hydroxybenzyl)trimethylammonium iodide
was used instead. Initial substrate concentrations were ca.. 2 × 10-4
Figure 1 shows that o-quinone methide undergoes both acid-
catalyzed and uncatalyzed reactions. The data were therefore
analyzed using the rate law of eq 3. Least-squares fitting
provided the results kH ) (8.41 ( 0.12) × 105 M-1 s-1, kH
/
,
+
+
+
kD ) 0.418 ( 0.017, (kUC H O
)
) (2.60 ( 0.06) × 102 s-1
2
(k
)
/(k )
UC D2O
) 1.42 ( 0.06.
(6) Modica, E.; Zanaletti, R.; Freccero, M.; Mella, M. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 41-52.
UC H2O
(7) Barker, B.; Diao, L.; Wan, P. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1997, 104,
91-96.
kobs ) kUC + kL+ [L+]
(3)
(8) Cottet, F.; Cottier, L.; Descote, G. Can. J. Chem. 1990, 68, 1251-
1257.
6
These results are consistent with kH ) 1.4 × 10 M-1 s-1 and
+
(9) Pochini, A.; Puglia, G.; Ungaro, R. Synthesis 1983, 906-907.
(10) Wagner, A.; Heitz, M.-P.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989,
30, 557-558. Appel, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 801-811.
(11) Chiang, Y.; Hojatti, M.; Keeffe, J. R.; Kresge, A. J.; Schepp, N.P.;
Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4000-4009.
(12) Andraos, J.; Chiang, Y.; Huang, C. G.; Kresge, A. J.; Scaiano, J.
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10605-10610.
kUC ) 3.2 × 102 s-1 recently reported for these reactions.6
(13) Supporting Information; see paragraph at the end of this paper
regarding availability.
(14) Bates, R. G. Determination of pH Theory and Practice; Wiley: New
York, 1973; p 49.