Table 6 Comparison of some properties of the complexes
CH NCÉ É ÉAr, CH CNÉ É ÉAr and CH CCHÉ É ÉAr
2
3
4
5
A. C. Legon, D. G. Lister and H. E. Warner, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 202.
3
3
3
A. C. Legon, D. J. Millen and H. M. North, J. Phys. Chem., 1987,
91, 5210.
parameter
CH NCÉ É ÉAr CH CNÉ É ÉAra CH CCHÉ É ÉArb
3
3
3
A. C. Legon, D. G. Lister and H. E. Warner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 8177.
N. W. Howard and A. C. Legon, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans. 2,
1987, 83, 991.
A. C. Legon and J. C. Thorn, J. Mol. Struct., 1992, 270, 449.
N. W. Howard and A. C. Legon, J. Chem. Phys., 1986, 85, 6898.
A. C. Legon, D. G. Lister and C. A. Rego, Chem. Phys. L ett.,
R/A
h/degrees
R(NÉ É ÉAr)/A
or R(CÉ É ÉAr)/A
3.643
83.3 or 96.7
3.63 or 3.67
3.651
85.5 or 94.5
3.64 or 3.67
3.733
97.4
3.76
6
7
8
R(HÉ É ÉAr)/A
3.27 or 2.83
1.96
3.24 or 2.95
1.92
2.92
1.63
k /N m~1
p
1
992, 189, 221.
a Ref. 9. b Ref. 17.
9
0
1
R. S. Ford, R. D. Suenram, G. T. Fraser, F. J. Lovas and K. R.
Leopold, J. Chem. Phys., 1991, 94, 5306.
J. Casanova, R. E. Shuster and N. D. Werner, J. Chem. Soc.,
1963, 4280.
1
1
have similar T-shaped geometries (Table 6). Only for
A. C. Legon, in Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods, ed. G.
Scoles, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992, vol. 2, ch. 9.
T. J. Balle and W. H. Flygare, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1981, 52, 33.
J. K. G. Watson, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 45, 4517.
H. M. Pickett, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1991, 148, 371.
CH CCHÉ É ÉAr, where the spectra of three isotopomers have
3
been observed, has it been possible to determine h unam-
1
1
1
2
3
4
biguously as 97¡. The obtuse values of h of 97¡ for
CH NCÉ É ÉAr and 95¡ for CH CNÉ É ÉAr are very similar to
3
3
that for CH CCHÉ É ÉAr. There are, however, signiÐcant di†er-
15 W. Gordy and R. L. Cook, Microwave Molecular Spectra, Inter-
3
ences between CH CCHÉ É ÉAr on one hand and CH NCÉ É ÉAr
and CH CNÉ É ÉAr on the other. In CH CCHÉ É ÉAr, R is longer
by ca. 0.1 A
science Publishers, New York, 1970, ch. 13.
3
3
1
6 G. T. Fraser, R. D. Suenram and F. J. Lovas, J. Chem. Phys.,
3
3
1
987, 86, 3107.
and k is smaller by ca. 0.3 N m~1, while R and k
p
p
17 T. A. Blake, D. F. Eggers, S-H. Tseng, M. Lewerenz, R. P. Swift,
are very similar in CH NCÉ É ÉAr and CH CNÉ É ÉAr. Graphs of
3
3
R. D. Beck, R. O. Watts and F. J. Lovas, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98,
R vs. h and k vs. h are nearly linear for the three complexes if
6
031.
p
the acute values of h are taken for CH NCÉ É ÉAr and
18 J. Kraitchman, Am. J. Phys., 1953, 21, 17.
3
CH CNÉ É ÉAr. While the choice between the acute and obtuse
3
19 S. G. Kukolich, J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 57, 869.
2
0
A. Bauer and M. Bogey, C.R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. B, 1970,
values of h for CH NCÉ É ÉAr and CH CNÉ É ÉAr cannot be
3
3
2
17, 892.
considered to be settled, it can be concluded that the complex-
es have very similar geometries and binding.
2
2
1
2
L. Halonen and I. M. Mills, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1978, 73, 494.
M. Le Guennec, G. Wlodarczak, J. Burie and J. Demaison, J.
Mol. Spectrosc., 1992, 154, 305.
We thank the EPSRC for a research grant. A grant in support
of S.B. from the EC Human Capital and Mobility Network
SCAMP (Contract CHRX CT93-0157) is gratefully acknow-
ledged. We thank a referee for some helpful suggestions.
23 J. Demaison, A. Dubrulle, D. Boucher, J. Burie and V. Typke, J.
Mol. Spectrosc., 1979, 76, 1.
2
4
W. G. Read, E. J. Campbell and G. Henderson, J. Chem. Phys.,
1
983, 78, 3501.
R. P. A. Bettens, R. M. Spycher and A. Bauder, Mol. Phys., 1995,
6, 487.
2
5
8
References
1
P. Cope, D. J. Millen and A. C. Legon, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
T rans. 2, 1986, 82, 1197.
Paper 6/06816B; Received 4th October, 1996
1290
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1997, V ol. 93