C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
donors to a common acceptor in dilute aqueous solution. With
dimethylamine as the acceptor, trimethylsulfonium ion was found
4
to be ∼10 -fold more reactive than the tetramethylammonium ion
at ambient temperature (Table 1). When the second-order rate
-
8
-1 -1
constant for this trimethylsulfonium reaction (1.5 × 10
M
s )
is compared with the second-order rate constant (kcat/K ) for reaction
m
of histamine with the SAM complex of guinea pig histamine
5
-1 -1 12
N-methyl transferase (∼7 × 10 M
s ), this enzyme is seen to
enhance the rate of reaction with a nitrogen nucleophile by a factor
13 13
of 5 × 10 . Catechol O-methyltransferase has been shown to
enhance the rate of methyl transfer from SAM to an oxygen
1
7 5
nucleophile by an even greater factor, approximately 10 . Thus,
enzymes reinforce the inherently superior reactivity of sulfonium
compounds, making large contributions to the reactivity of SAM
as judged by the rate enhancements that they produce.
Acknowledgment. We thank Mark G. Snider for carrying out
preliminary experiments on methyl transfer between amines. This
work was supported by Grant GM-18325 from the National
Institutes of Health.
References
(
(
1) Snider, M. J.; Wolfenden, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11507.
2) Under driving conditions, in the absence of water, Raney nickel catalyzes
alkyl transfer between primary amines at temperatures between 130 and
200 °C (Winans, C. F.; Adkins, H. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 306),
and the anion of benzylamine displaces ammonia from neat benzylamine
at 88 °C (Baltzly, R.; Blackman, S. W. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2405).
3) The horizontal coordinate of Figure 1, b and c, shows pH values
determined at room temperature with a glass electrode. The theoretical
lines in Figure 1 are based on the fraction of titratable amine that was
present in protonated form at the outset of the experiment. In no case did
the pH value of the reaction mixture, measured at room temperature before
and after the reaction, change by more than 0.4 units during the interval
over which the initial rate of reaction was determined.
(
(
(
(
4) Swain, C. G.; Kuh, D. A.; Schowen, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
1553.
5) Mihel, I.; Knipe, R. G.; Coward, J. K.; Schowen, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 4349.
6) For a discussion of methyl transfer in larger ring systems, see King, J. F.;
McGarrity, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 175.
Figure 1. (a) Initial rate of conversion of half-titrated dimethylamine to
methylamine and trimethylamine at 226 °C, plotted as a logarithmic function
of changing initial concentration of dimethylamine. The line (slope ) 2) is
calculated for a reaction that is of the second order with respect to the total
concentration of amine (Scheme 1a). (b) Initial rate of the same reaction at
(7) Wolfenden, R.; Snider, M. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 938.
(8) Tang, K.-C.; Pegg, A. E.; Coward, J. K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
1980, 96, 1371.
(
9) Craig, S. L.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6690. In the
biosynthesis of methionine, the methyl donor may be either betaine
2
26 °C, at a fixed total concentration of dimethylamine (0.5 M), plotted as
5
(
Garrow, T. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 41) or, more commonly, N -
3
a function of changing pH. The line represents the behavior expected for
the reaction shown in Scheme 1a. (c) Initial rate of reaction of dimethylamine
tetrahydrofolate (for a recent review, see Matthews, R. G. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2001 34, 681).
(
0.6 M) with tetramethylammonium chloride (0.25 M) at 171 °C, plotted
(10) Cantoni, G. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1975, 44, 435.
(11) For reactions of the trimethylsulfonium ion with trimethylamine see
Hughes, E. D.; Wittingham, D. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 806; with oxygen
nucleophiles see: Swain, C. G.; Taylor, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962,
4, 2456; Coward, J. K.; Sweet, W. D. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 2337;
Knipe, J. A.; Coward, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4339).
12) This estimate is based on the specific activity and K value of histamine
3
as a function of effective pH. The line represents the behavior expected
for the reaction shown in Scheme 1c.
8
place the reactants in a position conducive to reaction. There are
probably limits to the rate enhancements that can be achieved by
these “physical” effects, so that the inherent reactivity of the
substrate is of special importance.
(
m
reported for guinea pig histamine N-methyltransferase (Brown, D. D.;
Tomchick, R.; Axelrod, J. J. Biol. Chem. 1959, 234, 2948) and a molecular
mass of 29 000 reported for the monomeric enzyme (Matuzewska, B.;
Borchardt, R. T. J. Neurochem. 1983, 271, 37, 22831), assuming that the
monomer contains a single active site.
If ammonium ions are capable of methyl transfer in water, then
why are reactions that involve methyl transfer from ammonium
ions9 less common than reactions using S-adenosylmethionine
(13) It may be worth noting that the rate enhancement produced by histamine
N-methyltransferase is similar, both numerically and in its detailed
thermodynamic origins, to the rate enhancement produced by yeast
hexokinase, whose action is probably based on similar principles (Sigmon,
K. A.; Wolfenden, R., unpublished observations).
10
(SAM) as a methyl donor? To make a direct comparison of the
inherent reactivities, we determined the rates of reaction of the
trimethylsulfonium ion11 with the tetramethylammonium ion as
JA021212U
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 125, NO. 2, 2003 311