A R T I C L E S
Ha¨ggman et al.
Syntheses of Alkyl-N-iminodiacetic Acids. Chemicals. 2-Propanol
(IPA) (analytical grade, Merck), ethanol (Primalco, 99.7%), n-hexyl-
amine (Fluka, 99%), n-dodecylamine (Fluka, >98%), n-octadecylamine
(Aldrich, 99%), and sodium monochloroacetate (SMCA) (Skoghall,
>97%) were used as purchased.
This study shows clearly that the hydrogen bonding plays a
very important role in the structure and the physical-chemical
behavior of alkyl-N-iminodiacetic acids, as it also does in many
other chemical systems. Hydrogen bonding is the key factor in
explaining many chemical and biological structures and pro-
cesses such as, for example, the unique properties of water,1
enzyme conformation,2 the behavior of lipid membranes,3
catalysis,4 and the double-helical structure of DNA.2 It is
therefore not surprising that the hydrogen bond energy can vary
over a very wide range, ca. 5-150 kJ mol-1.5 In recent years,
much attention has been put on the upper energy range, often
referred as short strong hydrogen bonds (SSHBs) or low-barrier
hydrogen bonds (LBHBs). The basic demands for being an
SSHB/LBHB include (a) a short distance between hydrogen
bond acceptor and donor, in the range 2.36-2.65 Å in oxygen-
containing systems,6 and (b) that the energy of the hydrogen
bond is at least 40 kJ mol-1.7 It has also been proposed that
high polarity and entropic disorder of the surroundings weaken
a hydrogen bond,8 while equal pKa values of the hydrogen bond
acceptor and donor should strengthen it.9 There has been strong
controversy over the existence of strong hydrogen bonds in
aqueous solution. Cleland and Kreevoy have stated “formation
of a short (less than 2.5 Å), very strong low barrier hydrogen
bond in the transition state or in an enzyme-intermediate
complex can be an important contribution to enzymatic cataly-
sis.”10 Guthrie has argued against this view and pointed out that
so far no short strong hydrogen bond has been proven to exist
in aqueous solution.7 Theoretical calculations support Guthries
view that short and strong hydrogen bonds do not exist in media
with permittivities larger than 10, such as, for example, in
water.11 This paper will discuss the possibility of forming SSHBs
in surface-active systems in aqueous systems using results from
acidic constant determinations of alkyl-N-iminodiacetic acid
systems in water.
n-Hexyl-N-iminodiacetic Acid. n-Hexylamine (102.14 g, 1.009 mol)
was dissolved in 2-propanol (250 cm3) and charged to a double jacket
1000 cm3 glass-reactor with a cooler, a Teflon-covered mechanical
stirrer (RW 20 DZM, Janke&Kunkel, IKA Labotechnique), a pH-stat
(Titrino 719S, Metrohm), and a digital thermometer (Ebro TFX 392).
Next 270.66 g (2.30 mol) of SMCA, dissolved in 300 cm3 of deionized
water, was added to the reaction mixture at 350-355 K during a period
of 1.5 h at a constant pH of 8.5, adjusted by addition of 30% sodium
hydroxide from a Dosimat (Titrino 719 from Metrohm Instruments).
The postreaction continued for 7 h at 350 K and pH 8.5. Thereafter,
the product was purified and concentrated. Excess SMCA was
hydrolyzed at 350 K and pH 12 for 2.5 h. The product was poured in
an E-flask and concentrated, and thereafter 4 mol dm-3 of hydrochloric
acid was added until pH 1.80 was reached. The solvent was partly
evaporated off, which caused precipitation of sodium chloride and the
product; the filter-cake contained 14.5% sodium chloride. The product/
salt filter-cake was dried and dissolved in ethanol (99.7%). In hot
ethanol, sodium chloride precipitated and was filtered off. The filtrate
was allowed to cool slowly overnight. By the following day, the product
had precipitated to a hard solid. The solid was divided into small pieces,
which were dried with diethyl ether. The compound was recrystallized
from aqueous solution at pH 1.9 to get single crystals suitable for X-ray
diffraction studies.
Analyses. Elemental analysis of n-hexyl-N-iminodiacetic acid: C,
calc. 55.28%, exp. 54.0, 54.3%; H, calc. 8.81%, exp. 8.6, 8.7%; N,
calc. 6.44%, exp. 6.3, 6.3%.
Mass spectroscopy: Calc. 217.265 g mol-1; exp. 217.131 g mol-1
.
1H NMR data in Me2SO-d6: δ 0.86 (3H), δ 1.22 (6H), δ 1.34 (2H),
δ 2.60 (2H), δ 3.38 (4H); see Table S1 for details.
n-Dodecyl-N-iminodiacetic Acid. First 100.88 g (0.544 mol) of
n-dodecylamine was dissolved in 250 cm3 of IPA and charged to the
reactor described above. Next 129.94 g (1.116 mol) of SMCA, dissolved
in 195 cm3 of deionized water, was added during a period of 1.5 h at
350-355 K and at a constant pH of 8.5, adjusted by the addition of
30% sodium hydroxide from a Dosimat. The length of the postreaction,
the purification and concentration of the product, and the hydrolysis
of excess SMCA were the same as those described for n-hexyl-N-
iminodiacetic acid above. The product was poured in an E-flask, and
ca. 150 mL of 4 mol dm-3 hydrochloric acid was added to the reaction
mixture until a pH value of 4.5 was obtained. The solvent was
evaporated off, which was complicated by formation of a lot of foam
during the evaporation. The resulting product was dissolved and refluxed
in ethanol (99.7%). The sodium chloride salt precipitated out from the
warm ethanol and was filtered off. The filtrate was slowly cooled, and
crystals were formed. The crystals were filtered off, and a second crop
of crystals was collected. The third crop of crystals was dissolved in
water/ethanol (75/25), and the pH was adjusted from 6.1 to 1.82. It
was a clear solution after 1 h of reflux. The solution was slowly cooled.
No crystals had been formed after 2 h, and the solution was left
overnight. By the next day, nice flake-shaped crystals had formed. The
crystals were filtered off and washed with cold ethanol under nitrogen
atmosphere. The crystals were dried, first under vacuum and then in a
desiccator.
Experimental Section
Chemicals. Methyl-N-iminodiacetic acid (Aldrich, 99%), perchloric
acid 70-72% (Merck, p.a.), sodium hydroxide solution (Merck,
Titrisol), pyrene (Aldrich, twice recrystallized from ethanol), and ethanol
(Kemetyl, 99.5%, spectroscopic grade) were used as purchased, and
all water used in this study has been deionized and Milli-Q-filtered.
Analyses of Methyl-N-iminodiacetic Acid. Elemental analysis of
methyl-N-iminodiacetic acid: C, calc. 40.82%, exp. 40.5, 40.6%; H,
calc. 6.15%, exp. 6.1, 6.2%; N, calc. 9.52%, exp. 9.4, 9.4%. The
elemental analyses were performed by Mikrokemi AB, Uppsala. The
Mass spectroscopy: Calc. 147.131 g mol-1; exp. 147.051 g mol-1
.
1H NMR data in Me2SO-d6: δ 2.38 (3H), δ 3.34 (4H); see Table
S1 for details.
(1) Silverstein, K. A. T.; Haymet, A. D. J.; Dill, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 8037.
(2) Bra¨nde´n, C.-I.; Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure; Garland
Publishing: New York and London, 1991.
(3) Evans, D. F.; Wennerstro¨m, H. The Colloidal Domain; Wiley-VCH: New
York, 1999.
(4) Shan, S.; Loh, S.; Herschlag, D. Science 1996, 272, 97.
(5) Kumar, G. A.; McAllister, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3159.
(6) Bertolasi, V.; Gilli, P.; Ferretti, V.; Gilli, G. Chem.-Eur. J. 1996, 2, 925
and references therein.
Analyses. Elemental analysis of n-dodecyl-N-iminodiacetic acid: C,
calc. 63.76%, exp. 63.1, 63.2%; H, calc. 10.37%, exp. 10.3, 10.3%; N,
calc. 4.64%, exp. 4.6, 4.6%.
(7) Guthrie, J. P. Chem. Biol. 1993, 3, 163.
(8) Pan, Y.; McAllister, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 166. Perrin, C.
L. Science 1994, 266, 1665. Perrin, C. L.; Thoburn, J. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 8559.
Mass spectroscopy: Calc. 301.426 g mol-1; exp. 301.222 g mol-1
.
1H NMR data in Me2SO-d6: δ 0.85 (3H), δ 1.23 (18H), δ 1.36 (2H),
δ 2.60 (2H), δ 3.39 (4H); see Table S1 for details.
(9) Gerlt, J. A.; Gassman, P. G. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 11943; J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 11532.
(10) Cleland, W. W.; Kreevoy, M. M. Science 1994, 264, 1887.
(11) Chen, J.; McAllister, M. A.; Lee, J. K.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 4611.
n-Octadecyl-N-iminodiacetic Acid. First 99.54 g (0.369 mol) of
n-octadecylamine was dissolved in 295 cm3 of IPA and charged to the
9
3632 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 12, 2003