incubation time period since the products of the enzymatic
reaction are detected directly in proximity to the target.10 In
addition, the biorecognition reactions can be localized in very small
areas by micropattering techniques,11,12 which not only decrease
reagent consumption but also provide the basis for multianalyte
assays.
The characterization studies described above are preliminary
and essential steps in the design of biosensors based on (redox)
enzymes. In this sense, the goal of this work was to carry out a
comprehensive characterization of a general bioanalytical platform
for biosensor applications using xanthine oxidase (xanthine
oxygen oxidoreductase; XnOx) as a case of study with the purpose
of developing approaches of broad applicability.
phenazine and phenothiazine derivatives, quinones/hydroquino-
nes and related materials are often used. Recently, some redox-
mediated XnOx-based sensors have been developed.23-25 In these
previous studies, ferrocene and its derivatives as well as prussian
blue have been employed as redox mediators either in solution23,24
or incorporated in the carbon paste electrodes.25 Detection limits
in the micromolar regime were reported for both theophylline
and hypoxanthine employing well-known immobilization schemes,
such as enzyme retention behind a dialysis membrane, enzyme
cross-linked with glutaraldhehyde on a porous Nylon membrane,
or incorporation into electropolymerized pyrrole films. However,
the drawbacks of the use of such enzyme immobilization schemes
are well known and documented.
In the present work, we have focused our attention on XnOx-
based biosensor applications using artificial redox mediators.
Specifically, phenothiazine dyes thionin and methylene blue as
well as hydroxymethylferrocene have been employed as electron-
transfer mediators in solution.
XnOx is a complex metalloprotein involved in purine catabo-
lism, oxidizing hypoxanthine to xanthine and xanthine to uric acid,
with the concomitant reduction of oxygen.13-15 In addition, the
enzyme catalyzes the hydroxylation of a large number of nitrogen-
containing heterocyclic compounds and the oxidation of many
aldehydes.
XnOx-modified electrodes have been frequently used for the
determination of biological purines, in particular, hypoxanthine,16-18
a major metabolite in the degradation of adenine nucleotide, which
is found to accumulate in fish and beef. As a result, the level of
hypoxanthine is generally used in the food industry as an index
of freshness. Most of these reported sensors are generally based
on the determination of either consumed oxygen or enzymatic
reaction products, i.e., peroxide19,20 or uric acid.21
Electrical communication/connection between redox proteins
and the electrode surfaces provides a general means of enhancing
the activity of the redox-active biocatalyst.22 Direct contact between
the protein’s redox center and the electrode interface is, however,
generally ineffective due to the insulation of the active site by the
protein matrix. Various methodologies have been employed to
enhance the interaction between redox proteins and electrodes.
One of the more common approaches involves the use of redox
mediators in solution. In addition, mediated oxidase-based bio-
sensors frequently operate at much lower potentials than those
based on the determination of an enzymatic reaction product, i.e.,
peroxide. In solution, electron-transfer mediators operate by a
diffusional route facilitating electrical contact between the en-
zyme’s redox center and the electrode surface. In the case of
oxidoreductases, it has been shown that both, one- and two-
electron, mediators can be employed. Typical of the first would
be ferrocenyl derivatives and hexacyanoferrates. In the latter case,
As we have previously mentioned, the aim of this work is to
describe bioanalytical sensor platforms based on oxidoreductase
enzymes. In this sense, the work involves (1) the study of different
artificial redox mediators that can be used as electron acceptors
for XnOx and evaluation of their equilibrium constants and kinetics
parameters, (2) the immobilization of XnOx by covalent binding
to gold electrodes modified with dithiobis-N-succinimidyl propi-
onate (DTSP) as a general reagent for a covalent enzyme
immobilization, (3) the characterization of the resulting enzyme
layer by QCM and AFM, (4) the assessment of the enzymatic
activity of immobilized XnOx by SECM, and (5) the study of the
enzyme electrode response to xanthine using thionin and meth-
ylene blue as solution redox mediators.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials. XnOx (EC1.1.3.22) from buttermilk was com-
mercially available from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and
used without further purification. Stock solutions were prepared
by dilution and stored at 4 °C. Under these conditions, the
enzymatic activity remains stable for several weeks. Xanthine,
thionin, methylene blue, hydroxymethylferrocene, 3,3′-dithiodipro-
pionic acid di(N-succinimidyl ester) (DTSP), and dimethyl sul-
foxide were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI)
and were used as received. All other chemicals were of at least
reagent grade quality and were used as received. Sodium
phosphate (Merck) was employed for the preparation of buffer
solutions (0.1 M, pH 6.5). Water was purified with a Millipore
Milli-Q-System. All solutions were prepared just prior to use.
Apparatus and Procedures. Spectrophotometric Mea-
surements. Changes in the absorbance were measured for 0.1
mM solutions of the oxidized form of thionin or methylene blue
after addition of xanthine to a 0.1 M pH 6.5 phosphate buffer
solution containing 0.2 unit of XnOx. Absorbance measurements
were carried out at 25 °C using a Shimadzu UV-1700 spectropho-
tometer and a quartz cell having a light path length of 1 cm. Before
adding the xanthine solution, the phosphate buffer solution was
deoxygenated by bubbling nitrogen for 20 min.
(10) Shiku, H.; Matsue, T.; Uchida, I. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1276-1278.
(11) Turyan, I.; Matsue, T.; Mandler, Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 3431-3435.
(12) Wilhelm, T.; Wittstock, G. Langmuir 2002, 18, 9485-9493.
(13) Harris, C. M.; Massey, V. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 28335-28341.
(14) Krenitsky, T. A.; Neil, S. M.; Elion, G. B.; Hitchings, G. H. Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 1972, 150, 585-599.
(15) Rosemeyer, H.; Seela, F. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983, 134, 513-515.
(16) Lanqun, M.; Fang, X.; Qi, X.; Litong, J. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 292, 94-101.
(17) Cayuela, G.; Pen˜a, N.; Reviejo, A. J.; Pingarro´n, J. M. Analyst 1998, 123,
371-377.
(18) McKenna, K.; Brajter-Toth, A. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 954-958.
(19) Hu, S.; Xu, C.; Luo, J.; Cui, D. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 412, 55-61.
(20) Rehak, M.; Snejdarkova, M.; Otto, M. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1994, 9, 337-
341.
(21) Gonzalez, E.; Pariente, F.; Lorenzo, E.; Herna´ndez, L. Anal. Chim. Acta
1991, 242, 267-273.
(22) Barlett, P. N.; Tebbut, P.; Whitaker, R. G. Prog. React. Kinet. 1991, 16,
55-60.
(23) Liu, Y.; Nie, L.; Tao, W.; Yao, S. Electroanalysis 2004, 16, 1271-1277.
(24) Luong, J. H. T.; Thatipamala, R. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 319, 325-333.
(25) Stredansky, M.; Pizzariello, A.; Miertus, S.; Svorc, J. Anal. Biochem. 2000,
285, 225-229.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 78, No. 2, January 15, 2006 531