known that the activation of the C–Cl bond is much more difficult
than the C–Br and C–I bonds and in general requires harsher
conditions in a heterogeneous catalytic system. But in the present
study the reaction results are quite impressive for aryl chlorides
(Table 1). The LDH supported Pd0 catalyst is potent enough to
activate the C–Cl bond to produce biaryl compounds showing
great potential for practical applications. The possible mechanistic
pathway is depicted in Scheme 2. The reaction is believed to pass
through the oxidative addition of aryl halides to Pd0 followed by
the formation of transient organo-metallic species reaction with
boronic acid.19
reaction and the result clearly showed that Pd particles remains
homogeneously dispersed on the support, without any appreciable
change in size and morphology. It is envisaged that palladium
nanoparticles stabilized by TPED could potentially be exploited
more extensively in the field of catalysis in contrast to bulky
stabilizers such as dendrimers, polymers and alkanethiols.
In conclusion, we have shown that functionalization provides
a better control of the loading of palladium and a relatively
uniform distribution of nanoparticles in the layered material. Most
importantly, the catalyst was reusable without Pd leaching and
agglomeration which is an important step towards a simple system
with the potential for commercial exploitation of heterogeneous
catalysts in water-mediated C–C coupling reactions.
References
1 D. Zim, A. L. Monteiro and J. Dupont, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41,
8199.
2 (a) D. Astrue, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 1884; (b) H. Bonnemann and
R. M. Richards, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2001, (10), 2455.
3 J. E. Martin, J. P. Wilcoxon, J. Odinek and P. Provencio, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2002, 106(5), 971.
4 G. Schmid, M. Harms, J. O. Malm, J. O. Bovin, J. V. Ruitenbeck, H. W.
Zandbergen and W. T. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 2046.
5 M. T. Reetz and W. Helbig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 7401.
6 Y. Mizukoshi, K. Okitsu, Y. Maeda, T. A. Yamamoto, R. Oshima and
Y. N a g at a , J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101(36), 7033.
7 (a) L. N. Lewis, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2693; (b) R. S. Underhill and G.
Liu, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12, 3633.
8 S. Bhattacharjee, T. J. Dines and J. A. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2008, 112, 14124.
9 B. M. Choudary, S. Madhi, N. S. Chowdari, M. L. Kantam and B.
Sreedhar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 14127.
10 A.-Y. Park, H. Kwon, A. J. Woo and S.-J. Kim, Adv. Mater., 2005, 17,
106.
Scheme 2 Plausible mechanistic pathway for Suzuki coupling.
Generally, mineral bases are such as alkali metal carbonates or
K3PO4 are used as bases in Suzuki coupling. The use of water either
as a solvent or additive 20 help with the solvation of these organic-
insoluble materials. Also, as organoboron compounds are quite of-
ten stable to protolytic decomposition by water.21 Cammidge and
co-workers have reported heterogeneous Pd phosphine catalysts
and used these in Suzuki coupling in a DME:water (3 : 1) solvent
mixture.22 Low yields are obtained with nonpolar solvents such as
toluene and o-xylene, while polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran,
1,4-dioxane and 1,4-dioxane–water (5 : 1) gave good yields.
Notably, it was reported that the reduced Pd0 species were
more easily leached into the solution than PdII species.23 Hence
the use of heterogeneous catalyst, free from Pd leaching and
agglomeration, is highly desirable for achieving high activity and
catalyst reusability. In this context, the catalyst was removed from
the solution after approximately 50% conversion at the reaction
temperature. The isolated solution did not exhibit any further
reactivity under similar reaction conditions. These studies indicate
that the loss of the palladium active site is negligible, which could
account for the preservation of catalytic activity. The used catalyst
was examined by TEM (Fig. 1(c)) after the completion of the
11 F. Zhao, B. M. Bhanage, M. Shirai and M. Arai, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000,
6, 843.
12 M. Julia, M. Duteil, C. Grard and E. Kuntz, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1973,
2791.
13 B. M. Bhanage, M. Shirai and M. Arai, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1999,
145, 69.
14 (a) B. M. Choudary, M. R. Sarma and K. K. Rao, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1990, 31, 5781; (b) R. S. Varma, K. P. Naicker and P. J. Leisen,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2075.
15 A. Biffis, M. Zecca and M. Basato, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2001,
1131.
16 L. Djakovitch and K. Koehler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 5990.
17 Y. Zhao, F. Li, R. Zhang, D. G. Evans and X. Duan, Chem. Mater.,
2002, 14, 4286.
18 W. P. Zhou, A. Lewera, R. Larsen, R. I. Masel, P. S. Bagus and A.
Wieckowski, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 13393.
19 B. M. Choudary, S. Madhi, M. L. Kantam, B. Sreedhar and Y. Iwasawa,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 2292.
20 J. A. Anderson, A. Athawale, F. E. Imrie, F.-M. McKenna, A. McCue,
D. Molyneux, K. Power, M. Shand and R. P. K. Wells, J. Catal., 2010,
270, 9.
21 N. E. Leadbeater, Chem. Commun., 2005, 2881.
22 A. N. Cammidge, N. J. Bates and R. K. Bellingham, Chem. Commun.,
2001, 2588.
23 F. Zhao, B. M. Bhanage, M. Shirai and M. Arai, Chem. Eur. J., 2000,
6, 843.
7132 | Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 7130–7132
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©