Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 5463–5469
Evaluation of Ligand-Selector Interaction from
Effective Diffusion Coefficient
Anna Bielejewska,*,† Andrzej Bylina,† Kazimiera Duszczyk,† Marcin Fiałkowski,† and
Robert Hołyst*,†,‡
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland, and
WMP-College of Science, UKSW, Dewajtis 5, Warsaw, Poland
We present an analytical technique for determination of
ligand-selector equilibrium binding constants. The method
is based on the measurements of effective molecular
diffusion coefficient of the ligand during Poiseuille flow
through a long (approximately 25 m), thin (0.254 mm (
0.05 mm ID) capillary with and without the selector. The
data are analyzed using the Taylor dispersion theory.
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and cyclodextrin (CD) were
taken as model selectors. We have tested our method on
the following selector-ligand complexes: BSA with war-
farin, propranolol, noscapine, salicylic acid, and ribofla-
vin, and cyclodextrin with 4-nitrophenol. The results are
in good agreement with data from the literature and with
our own results obtained within classical chromatography.
This method works equally well for uncharged and charged
compounds.
in the protein due to immobilization may cause of erroneous
results when using SPR or affinity chromatography. Capillary
electrophoresis suffers from protein adsorption to the capillary
and at least one of the reagents in electrophoresis must carry a
charge. Each technique has its own limitations and only a judicious
choice of various technique can lead to reliable results. We present
a new technique for determination of ligand-selector binding
constants and additionally use the classical chromatography to
test the method.
The Poiseulle flow, characterized by a parabolic velocity profile
across the capillary, leads to the flow-induced widening of the
initially narrow injection zone of the analyte. The shape of the
zone is mapped on the concentration distribution of the analyte
by the UV adsorption intensity of the analyte. The distribution, at
the capillary end, is predicted by the Taylor theory to be
Gaussian.17,18 According to the Taylor theory the width of the
concentration distribution is proportional to the square of the
velocity and inversely proportional to the effective diffusion
coefficient of the studied ligand (in a capillary filled with a
selector). The ligand-selector binding constant influence the
effective diffusion coefficient of the ligand and change the width
of the concentration distribution. Therefore the latter quantity can
The formation of a macromolecule-ligand complex in a solution
is an important process in chemistry, pharmacy, and molecular
biology.1,2 Drugs-protein binding properties1-14 have been exam-
ined using equilibrium dialysis, ultracentrifugation and ultrafil-
tration. These traditional methods involve the physical separation
of the free and bound analyte (drug, ligand), followed by an
analysis step. Equilibrium dialysis is often considered as a
reference method in drug-protein binding studies.3 Ultrafiltration
has been used as a routine method in clinical laboratories due to
its simplicity.2 Spectroscopic methods such as circular dichroism,5
fluorescence,6-8 UV/vis absorption6 and also NMR9,10 have been
added to the list of applied techniques. NMR studies and one color
FCS (fluorescence correlation spectroscopy) are suitable for
studies of drug complexes characterized by weak interactions and
fast exchange between free and complexed drug. Other recent
techniques developed for characterization of ligand-receptor
(protein) binding are based on chromatographic and electro-
phoretic methods.11-15 Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosen-
sor technology, such as BIACORE16 can give high sensitivity and
high throughput information. However conformational changes
(3) Lindup, W. E. In Progressin Drug Metabolism, Chapter 4; Bridges, J. W.;
Chesseud, L. F.; Gibson, G. G., Eds.; Taylor and Francies: New York, 1987;
Vol. 10.
(4) Hage, D. S.; Tweed, S. A. J. Chromatogr., B 1997, 699, 499–525
(5) Cooper, C. L.; Dubin, P. L.; Kayitmazer, A. B.; Turksen, S. Curr. Opin.
Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 10, 52–78
(6) Seedher, N.; Bhatia, S. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 39, 257–262
(7) Seedher, N.; Agarwal, P. Ind. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 68, 327
(8) Xie, M.; Long, M.; Liu, Y.; Qin, C.; Wang, Y. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006,
1760 (8), 1184–1191
(9) Danel, C.; Azaroual, N.; Brunel, A.; Lannoy, D.; Vermeersch, G.; Odou, P.;
Vaccher, C. J. Chromatogr., A 2008, 1215, 185–193
(10) Zhu-Sheng, J.; Cong-Gang, L.; Xi-An, M.; Mai-Li, L.; Ji-Ming, H. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50 (8), 1017–1021
(11) Joseph, K. S.; Moser, A. C.; Basiaga, S. B. G.; Schiel, J. E.; Hage, D. S.
J. Chromatogr., A 2009, 1216, 3492–3500
(12) Mallik, R.; Yoo, M. J.; Chen, S.; Hage, D. S. J. Chromatogr., B 2008, 876,
69–75
(13) Sun, Y.; Cressman, S.; Fang, N.; Cullis, P. R.; Chen, D. D. Y. Anal. Chem.
2008, 80, 3105–3111
(14) Zhao, P.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Anal Bioanal
Chem 2009, 393, 257–261
(15) Kwaterczak, A.; Duszczyk, K.; Bielejewska, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 645,
98–104
(16) Rich, R. L.; Day, Y.S. N.; Morton, T. A.; Myszka, D. G. Anal. Biochem. 2001,
296, 197–207
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
* Address correspondence to either author. E-mail: annab@ichf.edu.pl (A. B.);
holyst@ptys.ichf.edu.pl (R. H.).
.
† Polish Academy of Sciences.
‡ WMP-College of Science.
.
(1) Bisswange, H. Enzyme Kinetics Principle and Methods, Chapter 3.1 “Methods
for investigation of multiple equilibtia”, 2nd ed.; Wiley VCH: New York,
2008.
(2) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants The Measurements of Molecular Complex
Stability; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
.
(17) Taylor, G. I. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1953, 279, 186-203. Aris, R.
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1954, 252, 538-551.
(18) Aris, R. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1956, 235, 67–77
.
10.1021/ac1008207 2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/10/2010
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 82, No. 13, July 1, 2010 5463